The only thing this idiot needs to do is make Teslas charge thier own batteries while driving. It's the simplest thing to do. We don't need flying cars. We need cars that can drive indefinitely. Put a small crank generator on each wheel and it will never run out of juice. So simple. Why he wont do?
He's an out of touch idiot who thinks society is headed towards the Jetsons instead of the Flintstones.
>>544550646They already do that when braking or going downhill, though it isn't infinite due to the laws of thermodynamics.
>>544550646The powers that be don't want that.
>>544550646Tesla is not a car company
>>544550646>>544550716He's also building shit far, FAR below the standards of The Jetsons.
>>544550646You are the reatd because you still believe in this DARPA Frontman is in anyway real. It‘s all fake and scripted and extremely gay.
>>544550789He’s building shit.
>>544550646I need this with a loud speaker that blasts>GAY NIGGERI can sneed thru the hood on. Tbh they'd probably like it and be down. Women would be the only mad ones.
>>544550789The Jetsons didn't have to deal with niggers.
Elonius is betting that his gay robots will be in every home and every McD and Burger King and any service job replacing niggers. Also expecting each home will have a Tesla robot to act as a servant. This will never happen.
>>544550868They did have to deal with The Nigsons thoughever
>The only thing this idiot needs to do is make Teslas charge thier own batteries while driving. They do that when braking, they recover some of that inertia and slightly recharge the battery. Have you ever even been IN a Tesla?
>>544550646Engaging generators while driving exerts force against the wheels which makes the drive motors work harder to maintain a constant speed. Not only would you not generate more electricity than you are consuming, you would probably end up at a net loss.
>>544550716>meet singh jeetson>his boy vivek
>>544550646I bet OP would have said the same thing about cars in their early days if he had lived back then>why do we need cars when we have horses
>>544551005Why doesn't the battery charge while each wheel is spinning? You literally have 4 cranck generators going. And the faster you drive, even more current is being generated.
>>544550646>>544551241Liberals...
>>544550646>We need cars that can drive indefinitelyThe absolute state of goyim cattle. Know your place you retarded animal.
>>544550646If you're so smart why don't you start your own company and make it?Answer: because you're not smart, you're actually literally fucking retarded
>>544551088You're a special kind of retard.
>>544551585My dad isn't a jewish emerald mine owner.
>>544551621Not as retarded as someone who thinks a machine can generate more energy than it consumes.
>>544551690It's totally possible to create more energy than what is being consumed with perpetual motion.
>>544550646Laws of thermodynamics prevent physical systems from generating more energy than they consume. But it would be possible to never have to recharge, if there was some kind of recharge system built into the roads themselves. Almost like a tram, but possibly using induction instead. Though, it would also generate a shitload of heat that would need to be handled somehow.
>>544550646>Teslas charge thier own batteriesI don't think you understand how this works. You can't just slap an alternator in one and adding wireless charging to interstate infrastructure would literally cost over a trillion. The only feasible way to do that would be toll roads and it would suck.
Plus you usually aren't on the road long enough to justify changing the entire infrastructure of the interstate. Just plug your shit in retard
>>544552105Those laws do not apply within the borders of the United States of America, son.
>>544550646A troll physicist has been detected.
>>544550646OP is is you who are the retard
>>544550727>due to the laws of thermodynamics.FUCK the law
>>544551241Because no one has quite cracked perpetual motion yet, you utter retard.The friction created by the generators would slow the vehicle down and the energy stored from that friction would be used to propel the wheels. Which are being slowed by the friction of the generations AND gravity.All that would get you is a vehicle that steadily slows down to a stop.You might get an extra twenty miles. But it'll take you two hours to traverse that extra distance. Just remove gravity and friction and your plan would work like a dream.
>>544550868Yes they did. That’s why they live in the sky, they escaped.
>>544552690>The friction created by the generators would slow the vehicle down and the energy stored from that friction would be used to propel the wheels. How? Explain this in detail.
>>544551241It does charge, but not at a rate that would replenish the energy cost of moving the vehicle forward. In addition, if you siphon energy (through friction, heat, or anything else) from a system, then the system has to use more energy to keep the same pace. You will always have a net loss. Always. No exceptions. Second law of thermodynamics.
>>544552957I gave you two negative forces adversely acting against one positive force. 1-2=-1Pretty fucking simple. However you're a retard, so I understand how you might not understand. So trust me...It won't work, it's never been shown to work, and you're still a retard.
>magnets, how do they work?I’m tired boss
>>544552959You're making shit up. And you sound like a kike.
>>544550646Holy shit, why didn't anybody else think of that yet?
>>544551241I refuse to believe that this isnt a moderately adept troll. People cant be this retarded... right?
>>544553109How is it 2 forces working against eachother? The wheel spinning is the source of the power. It's not working against anything.
>>544553126K, but it's true regardless.
>>544553293I knew it! You're a kike.
they already do this for braking and going down hills. Hybrids also do this sort of thing. Think how much energy it takes to accelerate a heavy car to 25 mph. If they didn't do this sort of thing they'd constantly be losing tons of energy at every stopsign.
You all are missing the point. If it's possible to have fans on a car and air jets that let it do flips and hang upside-down, there is no reason why you couldn't have a system that charges the battery while the wheels are spinning.
>>544553357Would it matter if I told I'm not? You already think thermodynamics is fake news.
>>544550825DARPAS BASED THEIR BEHIND ALL POSTWAR AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY CURRENTLY BUILDING SKYNET WHO ELSE IS GONNA DOMINATE THE WORLD AMERICA
>>544553543
>>544553727Another jew.
Although it can't generate energy as it drives (did you pass highschool physics?) It might be able to while it brakes
>>544553607He's just trolling.He probably genuinely doesn't understand how it wouldn't work, but that's beside the point. He just wants the (yous)
>>544553983I figured as much.
>>544550646Seriously though they should start making those FZero pit stop style chargers that fill you up while in motion. Pay an ez-pass style toll to get on the roaday
>>544553983I don't give a shit about yous. I want a care that can drive cross country without having to stop.
>>544550646And he doesn't want you to see this movie either.https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/musk
>>544554128Another Idea: a car that's like a little work out area but all the exercises involve spinning a wheel and charging the batter
>>544553983Kind of a weird thought. You can put the question into Google and get a more exact answer than any anon can provide here, down to the exact math. At the same time, this thread is anons who either know it won't work and why, know it won't work but don't know why and dont know it won't work.
>>544550716Imagine thinking Humans could build a huge liveable base on Mars.
>>544554329You mean the Google that is run by jews that dont want us to have nice things like batteries that charge themselves while in motion?
>>544554323Isn't that just the Flintstone's car?
>>544554462Yes but for silicon valley tech bro culture
>>544554422A self charging battery on an EV is more realistic. But then how does the jew make thier money from charging stations that require the property owner to pay for the install themselves?
>>544554451Yeah.
>>544550646>Dude just make a perpetual motion deviceYou realize gasoline car batteries are charged by the transmission which is powered by the engine and thus gasoline, right? You're asking for cars with nuclear reactors.
>>544554631No. I'm asking for an electric vehicle that generates its own charge while in motion.
>>544554706It doesn't work like that. It takes more energy to move to two tom car then it can generate.
>>544554706And the answer you’ve received is that they already do that, but only when slowing down or braking.
>>544554766The battery is providing the power to move the car. You can trickle back energy to the battery by using alternators on each wheel to send a current back to the battery. This isn't rocket science. The truth is that this is totally possible. But kikes wont allow it.
>>544554821Makes no sense. Why when braking or slowing down? I have a crank radio that charges the battery more when I spin it faster. How does that not apply to something like a car battery?
>>544554952You can recover some of the energy sure. But there is no fucking way to make a perpetual motion device without nuclear. It will take more energy than you can get back. Always.
>>544555059Thermodynamics. You can never get more energy out than you put in, and you lose a little bit (or a lot) to heat and to entropy. It’s just how it is.
>>544555136So you agree then that it's possible to have an EV that can go like 5000 miles without a recharge?
>>544555198Okay. Jew science. But okay. How about an EV that uses alternators on each wheel to send a charge back to the battery so you can drive 5000 miles without a recharge?
I came up with an idea but I'm not sure how feasible it is.Im considering testing a threaded driveshaft design to likely power a pump or to convert the screw motion into battery power with minimal drag. I figure the driveshaft spins anyway when driving and it's already perpendicular to direction of airflow. Maybe some sort of aluminum sealed sleeve around a threaded driveshaft.I haven't dwelled on it much so I'm still stuck on converting the motion into something usable.Or a diy regenerative braking system for my truck with 4.88 gearing and 35 inch tires. Like using an arduino or esp32 microcontroller to selectively connect or disconnect a generator attached to the cv axles or driveshaft when braking or going downhill
What's puzzling me is why the military aren't all over electric off-road vehicles. Obviously not tracked, but imagine a cross between the new roadster and a humvee. Insane top speed on the road, resistant to light arms fire, low Infra-red, able to jump gaps and (with proper sealing) remain submerged using a carbon scrubber for air.Stick a small diesel generator motor in it to recharge overnight, and a minigun on the roof swivel. It would have huge pulling power, and you could run all sorts of useful tech out of it, like chainsaws, water pumps and purifiers.
>>544555391You’ve moved the goalposts and I’m stupid for feeding a troll anyway. Peace.
>>544555289Sure? I don't know. Has battery tech become that good? Why does it matter? EV still rely on electricity which has to be converted from something. We need more nuclear power. All there is to it. If you want EV then you need to support the mass funding of nuclear power plants
>>544555395Keep going, anon! Although... If you figure this out, you'll probably end up dead. Kikes don't like self sufficiency.
>>544554706DUE TO EVS BEING GAY BY THEIR NATURE THEY MAKE NO NOISE NO RUMBLE TO THE POINT THEY ADD ENGINE NOISE WITH SPEAKERS AND WOOFERS SO THEY ALREADY KNOW HOW GAY THEY ARE BUT THEY STILL CANT UNGAY EVS VERY UNFORTUNATE MIGHT EVEN SAY SAD!
>>544555567I personally don't want EVs. I'm just curious why Mr. Mars Musk can't figure out how to make the battery life of his stolen car design work more efficiently.
>>544555533How have I moved the goal post?
>>544555510It's 100% because of the range. Energy density in batteries is not as good as the energy density in liquid fuels. It's not even close, we're talking 30 or even 50 times the energy density, depending on what fuel.
>>544555729No you're asking why he can't perform magic... You seem set on the fact a car can just charge its own battery with motion. It isn't possible, man.
>>544553223>How is it 2 forces working against eachother? The wheel spinning is the source of the power. It's not working against anything.Bait but I'll biteA generator has to physically contact the spinning wheel axle/motor with carbon brushes or whatever to create an electric charge, and that creates drag because the generator is physically fighting the rotation of the wheel/axle to harness energyBUT, if you meant the ROLLING motion of the wheel, you could possibly lay out some sort of regenerative bumpers or shocks that build up a charge whenever a wheel rolls over it, but idk how effective that isAlso, the wheels on a car spin because the energy from gasoline being combusted in your engine powers them
>>544555973But we can fly into space and land on the moon but also not be able to check the bottom of the ocean here on earth kind stuff?
I am also puzzled, but the thing I am puzzled by is the resistance to standardized battery sizes. If there was standardized battery sizes instead of every car make insisting on their own, you could have battery stations along roads. You'd pull up to the station, hand in your depleted battery, then get a new battery in return. You would only pay for the difference in recharge costs and wear and tear. It would be cheap, efficient, and would create a strong incentive for energy and battery efficiency. Yet we put up with every EV maker LARPing that their own size and make is the gold standard for everything everywhere. Fuck, if you had standardized battery sizes, an EV could even have modular battery slots, meaning you could decide on your own how much juice you feel you need to load your car with. If you're farting around the same city, you only need a few batteries. If you want to go longer, you can just add extra batteries. It'd add weight, but not more than the stored energy needed to move it.
>>544554706No you should be asking for the road infrastructure that would be able to deliver a charge to the automobile as it's functioning. Sort of like how trolleys work, but wirelessly.
What a remarkably retarded OP. Did you presume that a battery can infinitely recharge itself? Did you really believe that there is not only no energy lost during propulsion, but that there can be energy gained such that the battery can recharge?Nigger, how fucking dumb are you?
>>544555975I understand that the wheels are being powered by energy. But you should be able to put that energy back with an EV. Not all of it. But enough to make them more efficient. They should easily be able to go 5x farther than they currently do.
>>544550727>uhh you can't have infinite energy..Because uh.. YOU JUST CAN'T, TRUST THE EXPERTS OK?!
>>544556213>nigger swaps battery for a hay baleretard
>all he needs to do is defy the laws of physicsSAAAAGE
>>544556213It's jews. They don't want us self sufficient, industrious, or happy. They suppress all technology that actually helps everyone.
>>544556239I'm not sure how dumb I am. Tell me more.
>>544556239op guzzled so much fermented horse-cum prior to making this post that he forgot about the laws of thermodynamics
>>544556367This. Kek
>>544556160You have such a fundamental mis in understanding of how the forced of the universe work. We have been to the bottom of the Mariana Trench. James Cameron a fucking movie director has been there. Do you have any idea the amount of pressure an entire ocean casts? 16000 lbs per square inch. The pressure in space? Zero. It's a vacuum.
>>544556350>They should easily be able to go 5x farther than they currently do.Can you show your math?
>>544556535Please enlighten me on the tenants of Thermal Dynamics.
>>544556350>"We don't need flying cars. We need cars that can drive indefinitely. Put a small crank generator on each wheel and it will never run out of juice. So simple. Why he wont do?"SAAAAAGE
>>544550646> charge thier own batteries while driving.This oc is not possible because you inevitably drain the battery to accelerate and keep moving in the first place. What you could do, however, is recuperation of at least a part of the energy when decelerating by converting the kinetic force back into electricity. The problem with this remains the loss of conversion, the low degree of efficiency when trying to store this recuperated energy in the battery again. It would be much more efficient to reuse this electricity immediately for acceleration, like at the end of curves. This is how it's being used in motor sport.
>>544556350Yeah the issue with that is mostly related to efficiency and materials science. It's possible in theory but the only requirement is that the entire vehicle and passengers must weigh almost nothing And by that metric, theoretically we should've already been recycling all the losses from gas engines via exhaust and other mechanisms to drive much longer distances but every attempt makes the car unreliable as fuck
Musk and Big Oil don't want you to have this.
>>544556676>is recuperation of at least a part of the energyThis is literally what a transmission does.
>>544556557So you believe a movie man in a jewish country has been to the bottom of the ocean? You think they are not lying to you? The Abyss was shot in a navy seal training facility. That nigger has never been to the bottom of the ocean. And if you think he did manage to explore the entire ocean by himself, then why is it so hard to think we could have an EV that goes 10000 miles before needing a charge?
>>544556605there are multiple posts about it in this very thread, you thread sliding troglodyteSAAAAGE
>>544556830You said 5000 earlier kek. You havin' a giggle?
>>544551886on an entirely downhill journey with no need to brake, sure! you should take one OP! saaaaaaage
>>544556711Would making a smaller battery help in the efficiency of recharging?
Most of the energy lost in a combustion vehicle is heat, and drag from wind. Friction and such is a miniscule portion. Like 15% perhaps. If you want to be more fuel efficient, you need to capture and convert excess heat into energy, and then make drag from wind a lot less.
>>544557009stop helping Chang here develop a perpetual suicide machine. if it works, you'll never see a penny, if it results in his untimely demise your social credit score will suffer immensely
>>544556942no he's probably some third world engineering student who is creatively bankrupt and phishing for a working thesis
>>544556676>>544556789Yeah and a turbo does the same via combustion exhaust pressure, supercharger via serpentine belt, differential via transmission, axle via differential, wheel via axleShit, maybe I can just axe my axles and rig a monowheel design that encompasses the rear axle, using sticks with caster wheels to keep the truck balanced. Better yet, I can buy a motorcycle
>>544556942I was being facetious. I know a battery can't go indefinitely. But these EVs should be able to go way farther than they do. Orders of magnitude farther than what they currently do. My point was why is Musk making meme flip cars instead of making the batteries more efficient. Wouldn't a car that drives for 5000 miles without stopping be worth more to humanity than a car that does gymnastics?
>>544557009It's called an ATEG.
>>544557241"We don't need flying cars. We need cars that can drive indefinitely. Put a small crank generator on each wheel and it will never run out of juice. So simple. Why he wont do?"SAAAAGE
>>544557317I like sage in my chili. Adds a nice earthy note.
>>544554163Put a sail on it.
>>544550646>We need cars that can drive indefinitely. Put a small crank generator on each wheel and it will never run out of juice. So simple.Let me tell you about my water powered car
>>544557223You are just proving the point. You have to use a fuel to generate the energy.
>>544557241Why stop halfway, as it were? Drop everything and put all the effort into teleportation.
>>544557241>these EVs should be able to go way farther than they do. Orders of magnitude farther than what they currently doShow your math
>>544557375I thought you were in prison.
>>544553223Holy fucking American_education.meme
>>544554952What is Regenerative braking? It's an energy recovery system that slows a vehicle by turning its electric motor into a generator, converting forward motion (kinetic energy) back into electricity to recharge the battery.Stop trolling
>>544550646Wow massive izzat loss by OP. Imagine going for the exotic future tech and not the Tesla Micro Chinook. KYS
>>544557572Why just during braking?
>>544557632But why male models?
>>544550646>Musk is a retard>Put a small crank generator on each wheel and it will never run out of juiceKek. Okay bait, OP.
>>544557572Which comes with a 30% loss in energy, dipshit. That 30% has to come from somewhere.
>>544557684You gay
>>544556997>Would making a smaller battery help in the efficiency of recharging?Recharging specifically? It could I suppose, since smaller batteries allow space for bigger or different generator designs.To be honest whenever I think up plans for a car that could drive indefinitely, I eventually conclude with the equivalent of motionless, silent nothingnessThe only way really is to have solar power that is 100% efficient on a lightweight car with no batteries at all. The car would have to be powered purely by solar panel alone and to drive indefinitely you will need to go fast enough to keep up with the sun at all times due to the rotation of the earth
>>544555943I get that. But the trade off in less noise, IR detection, and torque/speed has to be worth it in a field scenario. When did you last hear of a general issue military transport expected to regularly top out the range of an EV? Most military advances/retreats are on the order of tens of miles, not hundreds.
Lets stop arguing semantics and get down to it. How can you make an electric car charge itself while in motion?
>>544557949Nuclear power. Which will never happen.
>>544557949Who is John Galt?
>>544558009Electric should be able to handle the problem. Use friction as the power. Friction gives an equal responce. Hence the wheels spinning gives the energy.
>>544557881To make it feasible they would literally need to make most of the interior layers of the vehicle armor out of compressed lithium ion flakes or however the fuck LiFePO4 or Li-on batteries fit the lithium in them.Doesn't seem that safe desu
>>544558271Shut the fuck up. It is so damn embarrassing you are this desperate for attention. What went wrong in your life?
>>544557949Let the earth's rotation move the wheels, obviously.
>>544558339>what went wrong in your life?I found /pol/. Eat a dick.
>>544558368But the erf is flat or something.
>>544558368Or something like an unfixed space elevator... a bus or train tethered to a satellite.
>>544558293Cybertruck is electric, and resistant to light arms fire.I'm not talking heavy armour plate here. Just light, fast and agile (with a fucking big gun on the roof).Imagine not having to wait for the bridge-laying tank to arrive because you can simply boost over the river.
>>544558460>Eat a dickHow can I when you already gobbled them all up you fuckin' faggot?
>>544558570I'll spit some into your mouth like youre a little baby bird.
>>544558569The Cybertruck has a higher death ratio than the fucking Pinto. I know the Pinto well. My parents would have us kids crawl in the back where there no seats.
>>544558655>a higher death ratioYou understand this is war equipment, right?War has a higher death ratio than your mom's fucking pinto, retard.
>>544558625One would assume your children would have thrown themselves from the nest long ago because they couldn't handle your delusional squaking.
>>544558815Remind me how many times it has been recalled?
>>544558819No you.
>>544550646If we could gain energy by spinning a wheel to power a crank we would be able to make infinite free energy. If you could think for a fucking second you would realize this is impossible.
>>544558906I'm talking about developing military tech for a task, not repurposing wealthy trailer trash toys.At least come up with something worth arguing about, ffs.
>>544559078>least come up with something worth arguing about, ffs.>>544558920
>>544559078>If we could gain energy by spinning a wheel to power a crank we would be able to make infinite free energy.Engineer here. Can confirm.
>>544559178If the battery starts with a charge, no reason to think you can't maintain that charge with friction. Newton's law and shit.
>>544550716
>>544559391>Newton's lawWhich one?*you go AIEEEEEEEEEE and explode*
Howzabout a ring orbiting the earth with t-bars hanging from it? An orbital ski lift of sorts.
Now I'm thinking, what if one were to replace the gas and brake pedals with a crank like bicycle pedals? The vehicles battery would obviously assist you to propel the vehicle. Or a piezoelectric foot pedal that you pump to assist in a more complete or efficient combustion of gassesCars are inefficient because they have to drag around a bunch of meat bags who don't do anything to help
>>544550646the real solution is actually remove all unneccessary weight, remove the chassis and everything down to a chair and a singular wheel, then you get 100+mpg on a single charge
>>544550646Perpetual energy isn't possible. Go back to TikTok you faggot loser.
>>544550646Idiot?dudes worth a Solid Trillion now. Yeah, You're so brite.also that flying car was used in principle to show it can be done. just a logical stunt. also possibly with adjustment to martian atmosphere be used to free rovers stuck in the soil. it was nothing more than compressed air and gasses. its to get people out of a jam if blocked in. its not a method of commute
>>544559491Equal and opposite reaction. Friction works like this. Wheel spinning requires energy to move. But it creates energy by moving.
>>544559596What about building cars completely out of aerogel and aluminum? And requiring the driver to physically crank pedals at lower speeds and acceleration while putting the energy into some type of hydraulic accumulator to be used for propulsion where it is most efficient?
>>544559761Okay...
>>544559759Sure it is. Childrens toys can do it.
>>544559830>Equal and opposite reaction.That's Newton's third law. Applies to all forces.>Friction works like thisFriction is multiply a coefficient (depending on the material type, and type of motion) by the normal force.>Wheel spinning requires energy to move.Only if you assume the zero-slip condition, which isn't always true.>But it creates energy by movingBzzt, wrong. Energy is conserved and is neither created nor destroyed, only changes forms. And every type of energy conversion is necessarily inefficient and involves losses.
>>544559869How about making every EV owner report for "power duties" once a week, where they get to spend several hours exercising in a giant hamster wheel?
I think we need some covert way of harnessing energy from the physical motions of billions of third worlders on the opposite side of the globe while we sleep. Or collecting acoustic energy from the constant honking in Mumbai and new Delhi
>>544550646>Put a small crank generator on each wheel and it will never run out of juice. So simple. Why he wont do?I think you're on to something, OP. Check this out, too. My uncle was killed by the government for showing me this. I'm probably next.
>>544550646doesn't that violate some thermodynamics thing... I forget what the engineering principle is but it is less efficient to do what you want. >>544550727I suppose going downhill without using any energy and collecting energy might work...
>>544560315>I suppose going downhill without using any energy and collecting energy might work...This is taking the gravitational potential energy you already have (due to being high up in a gravity well) and then converting it into kinetic energy, mins losses (friction, air resistance, waste heat)
>>544550646He seems to enjoy pissing off the troons and faggots of the world
>>544556350>But you should be able to put that energy back with an EV. Not all of it. But enough to make them more efficient.They already do that, but the net energy is still a significant loss. The physics of the physical interfacing being what it is will never receive back 100% of the energy it initially output. If it did you would have a perpetual motion machine a.k.a. free energy.
>>544560179That could work actually. I was thinking making every EV owner pump at least 10% of the energy required for a particular trip into an accumulator.The EV won't start until you first select a destination, after which it will calculate the energy needed and require you to crank pedals for a specific amount of time to accumulate 10% of the necessary energy requirements.With adjustable resistance of course, in the event you want to pedal harder to get energy faster so you can start driving earlier
Actually, why aren't all gyms using machines that can collect energy from people via resistance? I would be much more inclined to work out if it added fuel to my tank
>>544560315>doesn't that violate some thermodynamics thingYes. Thus far, we have found no way to produce "free" energy. All the energy we "produce" is just taking the results of existing energetic processes and harnessing them in a useful way (minus inefficiencies). Water, wind, solar, nuclear, fossil fuels, ALL of it. When we harness these powers, the energy we get out of them is less than the energy it took to get them into a useable form.The entire universe, as we know it, is a machine slowly winding down, and all useful processes are a result of siphoning off energy from preexisting processes as systems move from a state of lower entropy to a state of higher entropy. We find pockets of low entropy and build our civilization on the boundaries those low entropy pockets share with the higher-entropy universe beyond them.
>>544560568Tell me there aren't people who would make their kids do the peddling.
>>544553727Why did we change trollface with that wojak shit? Trollface sckizo was even better. Why?
>>544559410Biden is a classic American sports car guy, Jack
>>544561427>Tell me there aren't people who would make their kids do the peddling.There surely would be, but the kid would need to sit in the driver seat and pedal a grown adult's weight worth of drag, which will take substantially longer due to an adults strength and leg length advantage. Every footwell will have pedals, and every passenger will have to pedal what they're worthYOU VIL CRANK ZA PEEDALYOU VIL REIMBURSE YOUR EGZISTENCEYOU VIL BE UNHAPPYI VIL BE HAPPY
>the Tesla website revealed that the car was so empty that it didnt even have any seats in itOof
>>544550776Well, they suck at everything else even more. Batteries - chinese comoanies are way ahead? Promissed self driving 10 years ago - still in development and other companies do it better. What else is tesla?
>>544551585IRL ACT CHALLENGE HIM FAGGOT
>>544561427>>544563181You're going to have to pedal the tandem bike to Chuck-E-Cheese if you want to get pizza. Absolute child abuse?
