No nuance allowed: did the indians deserve what we did to them yes or no?
Every person deserves to be judged on their individual character and merit
>>544570302Who is we in here? If it is the Mughals, maybe.
>>544570302Civilize them? They’d all be dead from disease without western medicine.Also Indians never have a true civilization, it was always other groups of people taking care of them, from muguls to the British
they were brahmin and you killed them
>>544570302No. They deserved far worse.
>>544570402*cough*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haudenosaunee
>>544570302did you mean modern shitposting or the british occupation which occurred after the US became its own country which they are still salty over
>>544570571injuns. redskins. wagonburners.
I wish we could give them their stone age cannibalism back, they deserve none of the luxuries of the modern world.
>>544570302You mean what the Spainish did to them?
>>544570359unless you're brown, in which case NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER
>>544570302>Deserve's got nothing to do with it.It's interesting though that it isn't really necessary to specify dot vs. feather Indians, and the responses still pretty much apply across the board.
What anyone "deserves" is irrelevant. They got what they got.
>>544570302Yes cause the feather faggots got multiple opportunities to stop being cunts and cooperatethey understood their technological inferiority and knew very damn well that the European settlers were able to genocide them all and were only tolerating them because of their Christian faithEverything that happened to Redskin Niggers is all deserved and biblical
>>544570302What did we do to them? Let them in our country and take our jobs? No they didnt deserve it, and I demand reparations, 50 trillion dollars in today's money is a good start
>>544570302I will never be comfortable with the fact that I have to breathe the same air as indian men.
>>544570302You are American so I'll assume you are speaking of the Amerindians. It is not a matter of whether or not they deserved it but of nature. They failed to uphold themselves as a species thus they paid the price for that. Not only did they fail to consolidate themselves, they refused to. They instead chose to kill each other. An antithesis would be the Asiatic nomads. They are also primitive savages but unlike them they are cohesive which is why they survived even after centuries of war with the Tsarist Russia in which they were eventually subdued. Yes their culture has been Russified but they still exist as a proud people. Life is survival of the fittest. It is brutal competition. If you are too weak for this world then you don't deserve to be a part of it. The white man had to fend off hordes of shitskins for over a millennia even up until the 19th century as that is when the barbary slave trade ended and you do not see us bitching about that for we understand there is no honor in morally blackmailing people. After all almost every tribe and nation on this planet has committed some injustice; whether it be rape, slavery, genocide, plunder or just plain old imperialism. Objectively speaking we did not do the worst of it. Unlike them we made things right. We even patrolled the coast of Africa to end slavery. It is up to you to fight injustice and that's if your not fortunate enough to have others fight it for you. That is the way of the world whether you like it or not.In conclusion the answer is yes and no or neither.
