[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


no they're totally not fake pics, even though its not what human eye would see
>>
Uhhmmm that doesn't prove it's fake. it just explains the process

After capturing the light of distant objects, they assign RGB values to each of the elements in the image -
Different colors for Hydrogen, helium, carbon, oxygen, silicon...etc.

Just because you can't see the oxygen and nitrogen in the atmosphere doesn't mean it doesn't exist kek
>>
>>544664722
OP is probably a pajeet. they get easily frustrated when things dont behave in simple A to B patterns.
>>
If I set long exposure on my camera and photograph a pitch black scene that turns on bright on camera is it fake? Dumb nigger.
>>
>>544663807
The human eye has a pretty limited color spectrum compared to what exists in the world. We see movement and structure more than color.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.