I will explain to you how to win any political debate you can think of. Immigration, feminism, any irl face to face debate. You pick can whatever traditional irl face to face debate topic you want and this method will work.The solution will always be the same. I once saw a video of a guy who was debating against 20 people at once or something.They were trying to portray him as an intelligent guy, but what does that mean? An intelligent human being would be able to solve any problems. That kind of a human would be able to survive no matter what kind of difficult situations he faces. How would you then go up against somebody who is so good at debating? It's very simple, but we first need to understand what debates are supposed to be in their delusional minds.You think about these ideas. You imagine that they actually have some kind of a meaning. Then you imagine that these little baby words can only go on these specific sentences because there are rules.Then you imagine that the studies can only be used like this and the recent news stories and names of specific countries or whatever the fuck they imagine those words are supposed to be can only do this and that. Then if your words don’t make the audience and or your debate opponent feel certain feelings, then you lose the debate in your mentally ill head. It's a game for mentally ill people.That should be clear. How could you then possibly win against somebody who debates against 20 people at once? You obviously come prepared. You come with knife or gun or whatever you want.You hide it, obviously, because you're actually clever. And then you act as if you accidentally knocked your microphone on the ground. You act as if you're going to reach for it and at the same time you pull out your gun and shoot your opponent in his head or take your knife out and cut his throat or stick it in his chest while he isn’t expecting it.
>>544681200
>>544681200your method could work temporarily, especially if you disable their ability to speak, as you suggest. But there are 2 types of debates and you will RARELY get into a real debate. A real debate occurs between 2 people who are both honest and are seeking truth and understand the philosophical fallacies of debate and avoid them. You will almost never be in this type of debate.The other type of debate, which comprises 99.99% of debates, occurs between 2 retards and has an audience of retards. And the game is different. There are no rules, you should use as many fallacies as possible, you should waste the other person's time, and you should attempt to "dunk" on them to appease the audience. This type of debate has nothing to do with truth and everything to do with emotion and entertainment. It is, in fact, for retards.
>>544681200Tl;dr. Qrd me, bud?
they know they are hypocrites and they think it is funny
>>544681601that is why concessions are so rare https://youtube.com/watch?v=SembwMzMePQ
>>544681314You know, it looks like he pauses and braces up beforehand.
>>544681200You can't win a debate if the other side isn't seeking the truth and the audience doesn't care about the truth either. Debating can only be effective when you're dependent on each other, have to solve a problem together, and both of you stand to lose money if the problem remains unsolved. Televised debates typically aren't like that. Political debates, meanwhile, are about one camp trying to seize another camp's resources, with no one bearing any real responsibility.
>>544681948that is the point of the 1900ish characters in the OP
