At the time, yes
But the GOP's strategy for the last 50 years has been to always put someone worse than the last guy in the White House, so the last guy looks good in comparison

>>544698063
he had a democrat congress because the dems dominated congress from 50's-70's so compared to today his admin was very good, but mainly because he played ball with congress.

he was the most progressive president we ever had.

>>544698063
Check out the Nixon Shocks. Every indicator of the heath of the American middle class completely departs during his tenure. He gave away the American manufacturing base to China on the order of a jew and put the final nail in the coffin of the gold standard. LBJ was the worst socially, Nixon the worst financially.

Yes
but not because of Vietnam (he handled that expertly)
or Watergate (nothing burger)

Nixon stupidly believed jews (even though he was suspicious of them) that

1. ending the gold standard
and
2. opening up trade with China

would be a good thing for the US

these two things are the genesis of the horrible state of the US today

>>544699519
Nixon and Trump have a lot in common in terms of how owned they are by The Pentagon and the CIA. I guess that goes for all of them though. Nixon lost his political protection when J Edgar Hoover died essentially and all ties to JFK had to be cut. Similar to the post-Epstein political flush we're gonna get in 2028. Epstein and JFK murder both intelligence led operations. 100% fact. The End

>>544698063
jews sabotaged his presidency. Dick was not aware the plumbers were setting up a job to intentionally get caught then inform him later. Dick's mistake was after he was told about what they did THEN he conspired to help cover it up. That was it. He should never have trusted Kissinger, that was his big mistake.

File: HVGrANHWwAAyRr-.jpg (122 KB, 968x1048)

122 KB JPG

>>544698063
only wrong about one thing

yes, but compared to Trump NOPE. not even close. Trump is the worst president.

>>544698063
He wasn't a crook.
Fucking said so himself.

>>544698909
Abraham Lincoln was the worst president but I otherwise agree with your comment. Cheers!

File: file_0000000040e081fda8f9(...).png (1.82 MB, 1448x1086)

1.82 MB PNG

>>544700837

File: freezerbox 2.jpg (1.09 MB, 2242x1672)

1.09 MB JPG

>>544698063

>>544698063
Not because of overblown Watergate, but his stance on China, maybe. Anyway, supposedly he was poking around too much into the CIA, the JFK assassination, and maybe UAPs, so they had to smear and discredit him. Then managed to replace him with someone who hadn't been elected VP or President by the public. Think about that one.

File: 61ce517769385774c14519d58(...).jpg (33 KB, 403x403)

33 KB JPG

>>544698063

File: 965ca03be6039deab795f7500(...).jpg (62 KB, 600x600)

62 KB JPG

>>544701892
>china
can't be top goyim without doing some goyim stuff
He pulled the plug on Vietnam.
good enough

>>544698063
He was insanely corrupt and destroyed the global economy for Israel, but he was still better than Reagan, Dubya and Trump.

File: 7405a13abd699a0662789f033(...).jpg (206 KB, 900x1495)

206 KB JPG

>>544702909
>destroyed the global economy for Israel
kek
so that shit took 40yrs to activate.
>retard

>>544698063
He has the highest % of popular vote as a Republican candidate ever. Beating Reagan and Trump. He was extremely popular and liked. Until he started talking about jews and sniffing around the JFK assassination. Then (((they))) decided he had to go and nuked him from orbit with Watergate.