[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Top 1% of males are now having more sex than the bottom 99% COMBINED
This is an insane statistic
There has NEVER been more imbalance, most men are barely even treated as human, while Chads today live better than Roman Emperors
The entire study is full of blackpills, it's Norwegian, so even our woke scientists are admitting things are fucked
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility-crisis-could-require-a-further-marginalization-of-men/F26A4750B666344157278B72CFC5D223


And yes, this is political, it's about the collapse of human civilization
>>
>>544731411
Go outside
>>
Sorry we are goyim cattle

As long as there is food and porn we dont care
>>
You already posted this this week, shill fucker.
>>
>>544731557
If global internet access goes out for two weeks, entire countries would be on fire

>>544731597
No, it was over a week ago, /pol/ needs to see this
>>
>>544731411
>had sex recently
Not my problem
>>
>>544731624
No, we wouldn’t do anything
We would jerk off to the curvy part of our couch and when the internet comes back we’d post “do nothing, win” chudjaks on 4chan
>>
>>544731411
oh ffs
once again for those in the back
internet is not real life
dating apps are not representative of irl dating
your inability to distinguish a soft science write up from factual information is not political :|
>>
File: 1772787985414159m.jpg (112 KB, 1024x678)
112 KB JPG
>>544731411
Your so close to understand class consciousness it's unreal.
>>
>>544731624
I literally have project zomboid and rimworld downloaded locally, a solar panel for 400 watts and a battery bank that runs my PC for 9 hours.

I'll be fine.
>>
>>544731411
>Top 1% of males are now having more sex than the bottom 99% COMBINED
not if you count masturbation
>>
>>544731698
The porn access requires your ID after they reset the system. But you get 50 less credits for the month doing so (because SI ‘stole’ from all the banks and hence reset) You will have to do sewer work to redeem yourself because the bots can’t do it yet.
That better be a nice looking couch.
>>
>>544731701
Aren't they?
>>
>>544731411
Successful relationships last longer. People with success will have less partners overall, and more sex overall. Having sex with 200 women doesnt mean anything when you can literally pay for it except that maybe you have money for that sort of thing.
>>
Unironically it takes too much effort to date whores plus you have retards like >>544733656
>>
the harem society is rooted in the fact of achieving female numerical superiority by only keeping a few chads around and rejecting all other males. you can spot this everywhere, school groups, offices, etc.

you find the same mechanic in the smartest primates. alpha males dont actually have to fight each other in these. the women protect them because it means the women keep their positions in the hierarchy. a new male would change these.

fertility rates are still in free fall because of this. the "sexual revolution" failed in all aspects. most people can not achieve individual happiness in this group dynamic. it only benefits the people at the very top the most powerful men and women. we have a similar problem in economics where the top 5% decide what is right and wrong, in turn fucking the 95% over.
>>
>>544731411
>having more sex
More partners, not more sex.
I guarantee you 100% percent that a monogamous religious couple that married as virgins are having ten times more sex than the biggest chad.
>>
>>544733656
>>544734248
why are you talking about oranges when the topic is bananas?
yea we know people in relationships have sex. thats not up to debate. thats not the thread.
>>
>>544734324
You said "having more sex" and that is objectively false.

Chads who chase pussy and one-night-stands are objectively having very little sex. All their effort goes into peacocking and not fucking.
>>
Bump
>>
>>544734248
>married couple having more sex
You’ve obviously never been married before.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.