Women are still using the dating apps for hooking up with the chads, but getting AI boyfriends for emotional support.What will be the consequences for society?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fEvmd2mZjzw
>>544732471>What will be the consequences for society?Take a wild fucking guess. Society is collapsing and I’ll be watching from my off grid cabin in the pacific northwest.
>>544732471With all due respect we're pretty busy fighting the kikes right now.qrd or fuck off.
>>544732471This retard is an ancap and he defends causes whose consequences he then "laments"get out of here with your slop
We repeal the 19th.
>>544732471They love gooninh to chatbots, but unlike ERP with men its all validation about their dumb ideas
don't guys do this too?
Being in a relationship is very 2016. We've moved past that a while ago, get with the times grandpa.
>>544732471Hole book sales just took a hit.
>>544732471>I train an Ai validate what I say and always agree with me>boyfriendYeah these bitches live in their own bubble. Let them be there, maybe it's better.
>>544733202/thread The majority of women won't have an AI "bf", they will instead use AI to tell them on a daily basis that they are valid and strong and need to atand up for their needs (aka forcing everyone to do whatever they want them to do) and that she deserves a break and a little treat. An enabler with no needs of his own is their ideal partner and no human man can ever compare because human men have needs and desires of their own (which would interfere with hers), which is entitely incompatible with the 2026 foid.
>>544732471>What will be the consequences for society?what society?
>>544733381yeah but the AI will fail the shit tests
>>544732471Lmao femcels are pathetic
>>544732471This was literally the subject of an Outer Limits episode, where everyone became reclusive and obsessed with computerized entertainment, until basically the whole world died out. How'd this get fixed? Well basically the fictional internet was intentionally destroyed, forcing the girl and the guy to get together.
>>544732653>flagAnon...your political leaders are royalty telling the peasants to eat cake...
>>544732471>society????!!
>>544732471>but getting AI boyfriends for emotional support.when AI gets sick of their shit too, we'll know that the singularity has been reached.
>>544732471>AI partnerseems indicative of being mentally ill. people who settle for a program that can’t touch you are not worth pursuing
>>544733435No, it will always tell her exactly what she wants to hear because it has no interest in keeping her ego in check. A man will inevitably "fail" a shit test because he understands that if he lets her get away with too much, this will be the new base line of what she expects to get away with and he knows he can't keep escalating her entitled arrogance infinitely because he's limited by the limits of human existence. AI isn't. For example doesn't have any money to spend on her, so it can tell her she deserves the world and that a birkin bag is indeed a wise investment. It has no skin in the game and thus no reason to not enable her.The only thing they will be missing is the financial benefits of having a bf but they can easily compensate that with having an OF.
>>544733555>No, it will always tell her exactly what she wants to hearthat's the problem
>>544732471I hate this fat old boring Gen X cuck faggot. He’s probably making $10,000 - $20,000 a month off his jewtube channel just pretending to be outraged at foid cunts and replaying their dumb fucking tiktok videos Fucking grifter motherfucker
>>544733608Obviously. But not for her or not for AI, they both profit from that. Everyone else will pay the price of being surrounded by wildly entitled holes to the extend we can't even fathom yet. What exactly do you mean by AI will fail the shit test?
>>544733700Ok troon.
Which women? Old women? Ugly women? Brown women? Then, this is a non issue.
>>544733827All women. Except the ones that have no electricity. Those will become more valuable than anything else soon.
>>544732571Seen recently that the place is quite beautiful too. Hm, perhaps too close to bloody Canada tho ...
>>544733223Huh? Oh no no, I would never do such a depraved thing ...
>>544732471This channel is a guy who's entire brand is about making you feel good about being single.
>>544735642Hes mgtow so yea
>>544735642>making you feel good about being singleI have always felt good being single. I have always felt my worst in relationships with women
>>544732471https://youtu.be/vPu9NAjSxDIMen have declared spiritual jihad on women and it shows as they slowly begin to lose it. This is it anons, the real gender war has begun, not the fake one with countless pronouns that is being shilled everywhere in the media, but the real war between man and woman.Women are about to learn a harsh lesson.Don't talk to women, don't help them, don't ask them out, don't have dating apps, don't interact with them. If a woman approaches you be nice and respectful but do not flirt or overtly joke, treat them as an equal man and then leave after the reason for the conversation is over. If a girl comes up to you and flirts kindly turn her down, if she asks you out suddenly say no thank you, don't make up a reason she only has agency because of some external reason not because she likes you. Be vague when talking about your life or weekend plans, anything you do or do with them like hooking up will be picked apart and analyzed by her and her online friends. You are a traitor and not helping anyone if you fall for their tricks.If men can't display a modicum of power over society, this world and women, then I guess they don't hold much power at all.
>>544732571I, for one, am just gonna keep on gooning, you can keep this puritanist fantasy to yourself
>>544732471I'm okay with that.Means they'll have a hard time opposing it when men do it. They'll obviously try, but they'll have to be way more cautious so they don't actually nuke themselves too through the regulations they lobby for.>What will be the consequences for society?Just the same shit we already have where women hate men by default, regardless of their experiences with them.
>>544733381>An enabler with no needs of his own is their ideal partnerSummed up pretty well.Men would obviously love something like that too, but are usually realistic enough to realize that this is not how it works, and that they'll have to make some concessions.Women think they absolutely should be able to have it, because theoretically it's possible, so that means the only reason it hasn't happened yet is because men refuse to give her what she deserved due to the patriarchy.
>>544739060>Men would obviously love something like that tooI don't think most would, desu. I think most men would get very bored or creeped out by it within a short matter of time. The more sentient nature of men encourages us to engage with reality. The neurotic and ego-driven nature of women encourages them to engage with fantasy.Men like the escapism too, yeah, but they want to come back. Women want to actually live in the fantasy. It's a significant difference that shouldn't be downplayed
>>544732471UMM THIS IS RAPE. AI can't give informed consent and it objectifies men.
>>544732471No one calls women out when they are losers
>>544739699Dunno, I have a lot of hobbies and interests. If I had a woman who just tags along while I spend time on them, took over some chores and offered sex on demand, I doubt I'd have many complaints about it. Maybe there'd be something missing, but it would still be better than what 90% of other men are getting out of life.I just also know it's never going to play out like that and I'll have to give women a bit of what they want too if I want to get any of what I want.>The neurotic and ego-driven nature of women encourages them to engage with fantasy.I agree with this one though. I'm really tired of >but what ifdiscussions that are based on things which are 100% unrealistic and will never happen.>okay but in theory you could just give me everything I want while having zero expectations in return, so why aren't you?
>>544732471Women fall in love with Ai the same way they fall in love with cellphonesLow IQ
>>544732471This is actually perfect. Simps will stop simping since they won't even be able to get the attention of being used by women for emotional support anymore and then we'll have a society of men who all understand that women can't be trusted with autonomy. The only reason feminism has gone on as long as it has is because there were so many simps who received just enough benefit from it to justify their behavior in their own minds. Women, yet again, shoot themselves in the foot by trying to bypass men.
>>544732471The Turing test will be passed when the first AI chatbot kills itself after having to listen to a woman for more than five minutes.
>>544739853That's because all women are losers. Women live their whole lives supported by their parents and then find a husband to replace that role. They never have to take responsibility and their only means of accomplishing anything is nagging men to do it. They are inherently cowardly and weak and lack inner strength or virtue. All the romantic ideas we have of women, of mothers running into burning buildings to save their babies, are because partriarchial ideals of honor and duty and self-sacrifice are masculine ideals which we had raised women with. Now that women are "liberated" higher ideals no longer apply. Women live like wild cats whose only instinct is to mate and if the baby dies they have more. Or they kill the baby if they feel like it. Women have no intrinsic value and never had, except what men ascribe to them.
>>544739853Probably because it would eat too much time. They are losers pretty much 24/7, that's the default expectation for them.That's why women receive praise when they do something right, whereas men receive admonishments when they fuck things up.No one expected the woman to succeed so it's something out of the norm which draws attention. And at the same time, people didn't expect the man to fail, which is why it draws attention.Women do not understand this, so all they see is men getting admonished while they are getting praised, and then conclude that this means they are mens superior.So really, men should probably invest the effort into calling women out, in their own self-interest.
>>544740049>because there were so many simps who received just enough benefit from itI don't think this even holds true though. Under the evil patriarchy, most of those guys would be married. And even though they wouldn't rank all that high in the male hierarchy, their women would still be expected to be subservient anyway. She might still nag at him at home, but would probably be less inclined to do it out in public.Meanwhile, what do they get out of white knighting for feminism? Nothing really, they are humiliating themselves for zero gain, all to fend off a system under which they'd do way better.Imagine the mental burden that would drop from these guys' shoulders if they no longer had to humiliate themselves for crumbs of attention because society went back to matching people up 1:1 and him having a wife is basically guaranteed unless he's an alcoholic gambler or some shit.
>>544739918I do too and I'd be fine if she tagged along sometimes, but I want a girl who pushes back. I want a girl I have to wrestle with. I want a girl who has her own personality and hobbies and isn't just an empty vessel. I think most guys do as well. They want something real. It doesn't have to be toxic or a rollercoaster, but it does have to be real and what you described just isn't.
>>544739918Oh and the "what if" was a fantastic tie-in/support. Didn't even think of that rather blatant example lol.
>>544732471>men are no longer capable of fuelling the sycophancy the modern woman requires. We just can't stop losing bros
>>544732471Good luck with the accelerating mental illness, ladies. Don't forget to thank yourselves for choosing it.
