The Alberta separatist movement and the "invade Canada" horseshit was interesting but obviously it was never going to happen. So lets explore WHY it was pushed in the first place. My theory? It's a combination of things. The world as you know it is run by nations united by financial institutions (IMF, Bank of England, Bank of international settlements etc.) and there subsidiary countries like how Ukraine was to Russia or Canada is to the UK. Maybe it was a shot across the bow about Ukraine, but i think it was a psy-opp by the international financial institutions to separate people into groups. One's that would pose a danger to how the international order on there side works. It also worked to gauge how pissed off people are about the woke secret police and how much traction resistance is getting. For America it was posturing because of how ugly some places we're domestically that just so happen to have foreign observers (like British Intelligence) in LA. (I don't expect you to get it because your retarded just know that shit was un-fuckin acceptable.) I wanna hear the CIA bots talk now.>Thoughts?
>>544767386im so sorry honey
>>544767502Don't be I'm only partially cripple.But hey at least i was right.
>>544767386Well it's done to 'white' nations the same way disunity is pushed on individual whites.First you find minor differences that don't matter and then you really crank them hard to increase resentment. Then, you do little jabs like this to create even more tension and disunity between these nations. Basically, its an effort to destroy NATO.NATO is at a weird place in relation to Israel as the kikes are doing all this shit. While NATO is the biggest ally of israel, it's also its largest hitching post. Israel doesn't want to play by natos rules anymore and the more disunity in NATO the more liberty Israel has to do what it wants. The kikes also know that if whites ever get their shit together and kill all the invaders kikes sent to their countries, that Israel is very shortly after that. So any effort to prevent harmony is used including this Alberta bullshit.Anyway, that's my take.
>>544767887The state of modern Israel is a British invention to consolidate financial mercenaries into aa singular power structure to siphon natural resources for cheap to Western aligned powers while also acting as it's agents committing various crimes on behalf of international finance and western intelligence, if anything gets to public or go's to shit they are immediately tasked to act as scapegoats this was the case for hundreds of years in Europe with organized Jewish power structures specializing in financial warfare. No more. No less.>It's not that complicated.
>>544767386>let's create a distasteful version of a group we don't like to poison the wellIs this applicable here?
>>544768453Elaborate.
>>544768521I'm not familiar with the situation since I've mostly checked out of politics in recent months. But it seems that the group being pushed is designed to be overtly abrasive. If there's a movement in danger of getting too much support, creating and aggressively pushing an abrasive version of it, or pushing it to become a more and more extreme version of itself results in increased social isolation and loss of support of the movement. The memetic bridge becomes too narrow and too long for the normie to cross and the normie doesn't have the granularity to see the real, organic movement as a distinct entity from the distorted version of it.
>>544768957That tactic has been used since time immemorial, Focus on an extreme subsect of a group and demonize the whole. Conversely they might focus on only the good a group does and build its image upon those foundations when the group as a whole murders and steals.The reality is the words are just tools to manipulate you with at these levels of power, Dividing Canada into small power structures is what western powers did to Eastern Europe not the other way around it would never happen. When all words are exhausted and this movement continues to gain traction they would immediately turn violent then seek compromise. Unfortunately in this situation voting has no say because the issue is just to high level for it to matter. American power structures proved this time and time again with a number of wars, elections, and economic policy. Voting at certain junctions of intense power shifts is simply a tool for manipulation.
