How do racists explain adoption? Pic related.
no citycucks not realize there are niggers in rural areas in the south?
>Joel Berry>"just adopt a nigger kid it's really cool!"pottery
>>544774670these studies have already been donethey just adopted a smart child (they even exist in africa)its not the adoption that makes them smart
>>544774670That's anecdotal evidence. Empirical evidence shows otherwise.
>>544774670He was completely humiliated in the replies.https://x.com/JoelWBerry/status/2093819135595512142
>>544774670Education is important? So is genetics, idgi. You raise a kid with no allergies and has a foreskin and they think life is pretty goodYou raise a kid who's lactose intolerant and circumcised they become a bittern angry incel.You raise a jew it doesn't matter what you teach them, they will have curly hair, fridge body and a nose for magic the gathering. Same education, different outcomes dictated at birth.
>>544774885It's only education
he is monumentally retarded. If the family that adopted the niglet had different DNA, the niglet wouldnt have become a deer hunting christian. If he were adopted by lesbians in Portland, he would likely grow up as a shitlib vegetarian or whatever. What a retarded take by joel lmao it literally proves that DNA IS destiny
Christcucks are anti-science, and so they'll never look up the Minnesota transracial adoption study. To summarize the study, left-wing researchers in the 1970s wanted to prove that the widely established IQ gap between Whites and blacks was entirely environmentally caused. And so they placed a bunch of black kids with upper middle class White families in Minnesota and tested their IQs at 7 years old and 17 years old. They also included a bunch of adopted White kids and White kids that were raised by their biological parents into the study to compare. At first the researchers celebrated the results that they recorded because the adopted black kids had IQs in the 90s (the average black American IQ is 85). Even though the adopted black kids scored below the White average IQ of 100, they still saw a significant IQ boost. This suggested that the White-black IQ gap in America was indeed mostly environmentally caused. But then they retested the kids again at 17, but this time they were devastated by the results and didn't shout it from the rooftops to the press like they did with their initial findings at age 7. And that's because the IQs of the adopted black kids plunged back down to around 85. And this is a result that is now well established by lots of other studies. IQ seems to be much more malleable at a young age but becomes increasingly crystalized and genetic as you reach adulthood. The researchers also conveniently ignored the fact that both the adopted White kids and the White kids that were raised by their biological parents also enjoyed an IQ boost from growing up in a privileged environment. Their IQs were like 10 points higher than the White average throughout the entire study. And so the widely observed racial IQ gaps between White and black Americans still persisted all throughout the entire experiment. (cont.)
>>544777513This experiment completely backfired on the anti-racist left and bolstered hereditarianism, scientific racism, and eugenics because it completely controlled for environmental factors. These kids lived in the same households, ate the same food at the same table, had access to the same books and healthcare, and sat in the same classrooms. And yet the White-black IQ gap still remained. The researchers and other left-wing commentators tried to put anti-racist spins on their findings by arguing that the black kids in the study faced increasing amounts of anti-black racism as they aged - which negatively affected their IQs. But interviews with the kids involved in the study showed no correlation between facing anti-black racism and their IQ and academic scores. And unbeknownst to the adopted black kids themselves and their White adoptive parents, some of these kids were actually half-White and half-black, and they had scores in-between the average White and black IQ - which further bolstered the hereditarian side of the debate. And if you're wondering why I'm referencing a study from the 1970s, it's because the left agreed to collectively ban race and IQ research within academia because the results kept bolstering the KKK skinhead side of the debate. And these anti-science Christcucks are probably on board with that policy too.
