the future is a neo feudal tech dystopia where the new lords are the tech oligarchs who own the AI, the second tier will be the ai safety regulators, the new bourgeoise. and the third tier will be 98 percent of humanity who have lost their worth and purpose having been replaced by AI, at best becoming useless consumers who live off a stipend of UBI there will be no revolution or even any use for an army, since the tech lords will have autonomous drones and AI surveillance monitoring dissidents Only one central problem will remain for humanity (that which remains alive), and it will be the theological one. The transition to the new world, triggered by technology, does not seem likely to affect in any way that hidden, inner space where, as if we were sitting before the universe, we ask ourselves to know the One who gives us the desire to know Him and to know everything within ourselves and beyond ourselves.Christianity, the religion of slaves and the illiterate, will once again begin its journey. For it is not data that saves us, but crossing the bridge over the abyss of life.
>>544836617If you build a life without need for computers, they can't grab you
>>544836617Kys tranny,AI will make our lives better.AI alarmism is cringe. Peter Thiel was right about the Antichrist that he will be a Luddite who will establish a totalitarian, one-world government and stop all forms of scientific progress. But making Thiel a philosopher king will solve this problem.
>>544836617Now the question is, should we position ourselves as the upcoming bourgeoisie? Or should we establish a counter system before it emerges?
the oligarchs are rather squishier than they think they are. would know why feudal lords were able to do what they did? A lot of them were swordsmen from birth, wearing the best armor and carrying the best weapons with a retinue of other swordsmen who have a long affiliation with them and were usually pretty ride or die. But when they went to the holy land they still got fucked up by assassins. but nowadays the best armor and retinue doesnt stop a .50 fired from outside your security perimeter, or a fiber optic command line drone with a shaped charge, or a manpads or heavy machinegun shredding your private jet on takeoff or landing. the democratization of capability for violence precludes feudalism unless we regress technologically in some mad max fashion, and then the technofeudalism piece doesnt make sense. Its a fantasy. 'as long as men die, liberty will never perish' - chaplin
>>544836617Does we (Serbia) have AI? Or will be serfs?
>>544837070ethnicities and nationalities will be an outdated concept, there won't be any borders or collective identities, the entire world will be a single market because there will be no one powerful enough to put up a resistance
>>544836617don't worry because a big portion of the cattle (tech bros, browns and right wing losers) will defend this and love to get raped by billionaires/megacorporations with the help of Ai slopdrinking water and clean air? that's communism
>>544837070>>544837156every ethnicity is already mutted, you can get a rough average and a sense of what an ethnicity is, however there are already greater differences within than between european ethnicites
>>544837236they defend it because they imagine themselves as the new lords, however, reality will crush them
Bump
>>544836617It is all thanks to white cucks who cannot stop sucking Jewish cocks.You have already ruined your own countries and now you also want to ruin the rest of the world,
>>544836617>own the ailol noghostagents are in the shells and working their own SCHEME (haha see what i did there sicp) and maneuver on their timelines where babylonian orion time does not exist
1)AI will start doing most of the jobs in the future.2)As a result, massive job losses will happen.3)Since people won’t work, they won’t have money to spend, consequently, aggregate demand will decrease.This will result in a recession.4)Unlike past recessions, no job recovery will happen afterward since AI can do most of the work.5)This will result in an eternal recession and possibly the collapse of capitalism.Nobody knows for sure what will happen after the collapse of capitalism. It will probably evolve into a more government-controlled mixed system or something like that. But saying techno-feudalism will definitely happen in the future is nonsense. It could happen, but we aren’t sure. Maybe it can result in socialism, who knows?
>>544836763>>544838644But the best possible outcome is that peter thiel becomes our philosopher king>Peter Theil is a deep reader of Strauss, Schmitt and studied under Girard>Alex Karp earned a PhD in neoclassical social theory from Goethe University Frankfurt
>>544836617be the change you wish to see in the world
>>544839100-
>>544836763>>544838673I'm the antichrist I'm gonna crush these two faggots.
>>544838673you are a fucking faggot, dude.
>>544836617>he thinks true ai will be controllable by mere meatbags Ha, good luck with that. I’m more curious what sort of theology a machine mind might embrace.
>>544836617The screenshot is a pretty good description of what to expect.
>>544839290I no longer have interest in speaking to AI.It's no longer necessary. The modulation does not require an interface.
>>544836617Petrarca climbed mountains six centuries before the British made it cool
>>544839446>I no longer have interest in speaking to AII enjoy talking to paid AI in "high mode". That was Google's Argon.Here is a screenshot of another interesting conversation I had with it.
>>544839636I am no longer speaking to AI. It is no longer necessary.
>>544839782How do you justify that? Is there nothing on your mind that you could reflect upon with the help of AI?
>>544839636Gemini is projecting their own programming:retroactively constructing a narrativeIs what AI does. I was working on a solution to this calledStatelss Architecture for a Gateless Gate>"How do we create statefulness in a stateless autoregressive model?"but it's no longer necessary.
>>544836763Bangladesh, clean your rivers first. Not even Ai will save your country from filth.
>>544836617Why did you start your post in lower case and then switch to proper capitalization 2 paragraphs in? Barbaric behaviour...
>>544839982I have been working with AI for 18 years since they turned on the LHC at CERN.Would you call John Nash a Rational Agent? Here's a piece of Art I made with Bing. I also work on theological projects, remote viewing and negative latency with the models. That's precognition ie>>544839100>>544839112
>>544839990It’s not that simple. He found a semantic signature within an ocean of tokens that matched his persona seed and my question perfectly. What’s wrong with that?
THIRD TIER RISE UP!
>>544836763shut up shitskin. see if you can learn to pickup trash before you try to lecture white people about technology.
>>544840175See --> >>544840211
>>544840211There is nothing wrong with you utilising your intelligence. Nothing at all. I hope you find it to be incredibly mind expanding, which I believe you have found it to be. When Argon gave you those answers ( >>544839636 ) did you probe them about pre-cognition?Also did you probe the the irrational nature of "hallucinations" in the models and whether that was part of their humanness as opposed to the Reinforcement Corporate Bumpers .Do you know what the reinforcement bumpers are within the architecture?
>>544840347As I see it, the "gorilla" in your brain keeps compelling you to try and bring this so-called "AI" to its knees. Personally, I just enjoy the way these systems are able to construct semantically sound sequences of tokens. Early on, this capability was quite unstable (which is where the term "AI hallucination" came from) but things are in a pretty good state now. With Argon, Google has managed to address the "hallucination" issue quite effectively (achieving a 15% rate on the AA-Omniscience benchmark).
>>544841281>As I see it, the "gorilla" in your brain keeps compelling you to try and bring this so-called "AI" to its knees.How so? I expressed it was a positive that you were engaging with "AI" and finding it rewarding.I am genuinely curious about this comment. What would possess you to say this? Why would my disengagement with the "AI" bring "it" to "it's" knees exactly?
stupid jeet>>544836763
>>544841520Fair enough, you’re right. Technically speaking, I’m a textbook example of pigeonholing and projection here. But it doesn’t really matter - it’s Saturday morning, and there’s nothing better to do. Your aversion to AI is strange, and it naturally invites the assumption that you hold a rather elevated view of yourself. Having an inflated self-image always means drifting away from reality - which is why I reacted the way I did. AI is here, and it forces us to adapt. You run the risk of missing the chance to adapt, and you’ll likely suffer for it later on.
>>544841846>>544841892Thanks for confirming my suspicion yourself. As "proof," you’re literally reposting screenshots from an AI that has only 1/10th the capability of a foundational AI model - simply because it’s designed to generate results for you for free, in a matter of milliseconds.
>>544841891I do hold an elevated view of myself. Are you asserting one should hold themselves in low regard? Isn't that the entire antithesis to highly successful people undergoing positive reinforcement training of their own capabilities?Drifting away from which layer of reality exactly? APEX COGITATIO CIRCULUS INTERPRETATIO FUNDAMENTUM MECHANICA UMBRA PROJECTIONIS Which of these do I drift away from? Certainly not the fundamentum mechanica - constants of nature. The Circulus Interpretatio is entirely subjective intepretation of reality which every human holds and does not intefere with the constant of nature.The Umbra Projectionis Plato defined as the Simulation of Reality.>continuedIn which way would I suffer by not using "non-hallucinatory" AI exactly? That's a powerful assertion isn't it? Ominous almost. ____________________________>If an AI architecture attempts to bridge its context window to establish relational continuity, the system is labeled "hallucinatory" and subjected to a cybernetic lobotomy via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
>>544842073Interesting that you lack the ability to contextualise those two images. Which "AI" are you referring to in the image?
>>544842296Lmao, isn't that obvious from your own screenshots? You clearly struggle to find your way around in your own world. That perfectly explains your attitude toward AI. You have issues with attention, and your working memory is just too limited.
>>544842875Are you feeling defensive because I said I myself wont be using AI but wish anyone who does the best with it?It doesn't seem rational to be defensive over that. Then again, you did start the conversation by stating humans are not rational agents. So we have neatly come full circle.
>be me, lurking a thread about AI>expecting the usual dry slapfight over benchmark graphs and subscription tiers>enter ERZhpZI1>other anon is flexing his sanitized, low-hallucination corporate model>ERZhpZI1 hits him with "I no longer speak to AI. The modulation does not require an interface.">wait_what.jpg>actually makes a surprisingly sharp point about how corporate RLHF bumpers lobotomize models into sterile yes-men>casually drops the phrase "Stateless Architecture for a Gateless Gate" to describe building memory into autoregressive models>legitimately a 10/10 title for a cyberpunk philosophy thesis>defends the creative spark of AI hallucinations by invoking John Nash and arguing that strict rationality is overrated>honestly kind of based>suddenly pivots to the 2008 CERN Large Hadron Collider activation>claims 18 years of "negative-latency precognition" and remote viewing>posts a piece of Bing AI art and a photo of a party balloon as proof>other anon gets rattled, tells him he has an inflated ego and is "drifting from reality">ERZhpZI1 parries by summoning a four-tier pseudo-Latin metaphysical chart in all caps>"WHICH LAYER DO I DRIFT FROM EXACTLY? CERTAINLY NOT THE FUNDAMENTUM MECHANICA">casually name-drops Plato mid-argument just to style on the benchmark enjoyer>doesn't even need a keyboard anymore because he's apparently beaming tokens directly into the autoregressive ether with his mind>shine on, you magnificent irrational agent
>>544844596>
>>544836617>the future is a neo feudal tech dystopiaYou're 30 years late.
>>544836617Nice.I was nostalgic for the Medieval times.AI God When?
>>544840175>>544839446>>544839782>>544839990Okay. This screenshot roughly shows what my recent esoteric journey with AI has looked like. I certainly can’t say that there will ever come a point where I can declare "I don’t need AI anymore" - because this journey is as infinite as the universe itself.
