[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1599826950246.jpg (62 KB, 976x850)
62 KB JPG
>if you are atheist... why bother being a good person?

since you don't believe in God, karma, or any of that "nonsense", why should you bother being a good and moral person if it doesn't benefit you?

>it would be completely irrational
>>
>>544876562
If you're only being a decent person because you think a Jewish fairy is watching you from the sky and judging you, you're a piece of shit
>>
>>544876562
Because there is a law. I don't want to be behind bars.
>>
File: 1792514575674576.png (92 KB, 755x854)
92 KB PNG
>>544876562
Being good always pays off
>>
>>544876834
Why should you care about being a "piece of shit"?

Because some atheist is unironically trying to moralfag (oxymoron) online?
>>
File: FB_IMG_1791947609681.jpg (186 KB, 1638x2048)
186 KB JPG
>>544876562
Game theory and math says being cooperative is how we evolutionarily evolved to human dominance and develop cultures and all the benefits of civilization. If you are a "good" person because you fear consequences from law or a god then you aren't really a "good" person, you are a shitty person on a leash. Besides that it feels good to be likeable. I know, wild concept and hot take of course. Who would have thought being a repulsive dickwad doesn't pay off
>>
>>544876562
>Why should you care about being a "piece of shit"?
you are 100% a piece of shit
>>
>>544876562
I was raised athiest and have an innate desire to be fair. I don't care if you don't believe me. It actually makes perfect sense from an evolutionary perspective. Assholes were killed and exited the gene pool for the most part before faggy christkikery told us to "forgive" these sociopathic fucks we used to kill for eugenics.
>>
File: tero.png (139 KB, 469x351)
139 KB PNG
>>544876946
Because your very religion tells you to behave? What are you on about?
>>
>>544877115
As much as I don't want to admit it, a lot of that pruning happened during the medieval era where everyone was Christian. They would execute 1-2% of all males every generation.
>>
>>544876562
Why does religion have to tell me not to hurt others? I'm not a raging asshole.
>>
>>544876834
>you're a piece of shit
And? Are you trying to imply it's a bad thing and your opinion matters?
>>
>>544876868
There's no law against being an asshole, dimwit.
>>
File: 1425708870804.gif (3.03 MB, 359x202)
3.03 MB GIF
>>544877096
Game theory doesn't mean shit when you aren't a chimp with a primitive monkey brain.

As an intelligent, rational human being you can override your instincts and use it to do good or bad.

Scenario 1:

>Christian has opportunity to embezzle 250k in wealth from state coffers with minimal chance of getting caught
vs
>Atheist has opportunity to do the same

Only one fears damnation. You really think your "game theory" is enough to keep the atheist from just stealing the money? absurd.
>>
>>544876562
because i feel like it
>>
>>544876562
being a bad and immoral person generally does not benefit anyone either, retard. laws still exist that will punish you for doing these things.
>>
File: 1671954500473227.jpg (123 KB, 750x687)
123 KB JPG
>>544877371
ALL and I mean literally ALL of the greatest mass murderers in history were atheists. Your whimsical 'innate goodness' doesn't mean shit when 90% of normies would sell their own grandma for a cheeseburger if they didn't fear God's wrath.
>>544877619
Exactly. These dumbasses don't even realize their own notion of morality comes from the exact same religions they despise.
>>
>>544877770
>Game theory doesn't mean shit
John Maynard Smith's Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ESS) disagrees.
>>
>>544877844
>laws still exist that will punish you

Those laws were created by bad and immoral people who took power because of how beneficial being a POS is.

The laws they made aren't to benefit you either it's to maintain their grip on power.
>>
>>544876562
Cause moral frameworks weren’t invented by religion, they emerge from emotional projection without the need of believing some deity’s gonna give you shit for being “good”. That and simple cause and effect. You one of those retards who believe their morals are a gift of christianity or something?
>>
>>544877770
>but what if you dont get caught
Consider there is s butterfly effect to every action. If I embezzle, I may get away with it, but it could also collapse the company and put all the people I care about - friends, maybe family, maybe the friends of my children - into a worse state than before which would affect me because then I have to deal with the fallout of that in my community, whether I get caught or not. And life is too short to constantly maintain a web of lies or look constantly over my shoulder. The math says no

And what what would I need that money for if the company is doing well? I dont have to tithe and I can sustain myself. Im not so desperate im willing to live with the guilt and regret of screwing everyone else over. If I were embezzling because the company was being acquisitioned by a rich douchebag and I was making a fund or a new venture for those affected, thats a different story. Intention matters.

>>544877371
>>544877371
Thats because Religion is for sociopathic brain addled trogs so they could be resocialized into being good servants by their masters. Those of us with functional reasoning and empathy can figure for ourselves why its good to be good for goodness' sake without desert slaver tribal mysticism and imaginary friends
>>
File: 1786564794727107.gif (2 MB, 498x317)
2 MB GIF
>>544877942
>their own notion of morality comes from the exact same religions
It's almost as if religions mimic evolutionary developments... whaaaaaaat
>>
>>544877942
>Hobbseian edginess
Tit for two tat strategy in the end is far more successful that tit for tat or even belligerent strategies. Thats just a fact, I dont expect religioids to understand because that involves actual reasoning and study
>empathy was invented by religion
No it comes from neurology/biology, which is far older than whatever knock off modern deity you worship.
>>
>>544876562
Atheists can't define what good and bad are or why.
>my heckin monkey dick says society good
>my molocules and mRNA just decided to do stuff
Yeah that's right atheists. I called you out. I also didn't bump this.
>>
>>544876562
But being morally benevolent does benefit you even without a god watching over you.
You have no scientific action/reaction understanding of this world do you? You can't understand the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd order ramifications of your actions, can you? You don't understand that your actions resonate, however miniscule or grandly, through the world around you and can boomerang around and smack you upside the back of your head, do you?
Your argument is a really old and already long-defeated argument. Why keep trying it?
Creating a benevolent fortress of positive actions around oneself gives you defense against the entropic decay of the universe. People creating many of those fortresses creates a collective higher-order of mechanical constructs that further resists the inherent decay and chaos of the universe, thus increasing the benevolence and constructive forces of the universe. This positively feeds back in a loop into more higher order and more constructive behavior being done.
No deity is needed. If you personally need a deity to justify it, I won't knock you for it, but don't kid yourself into thinking that's an absolute bare-minimum requirement. That's a personal choice to need someone looking over your shoulder, not a mandate of reality.
>>
>>544878477
>what is good or bad
Evolution gave us a powerful brain and instincts, including the ability to feel bad when we don't achieve desired results. Its not that hard to figure out, you can basically go by vibes or utilize reasoning, minimize regrets in life.
>reeeee without god there is no reason to be good. My monkey brain says sky wizard will hurt me if Im a bad monkey
Now you are just telling on yourself as an immoral being who fears consequences. You are not a good person, you just have an imaginary leash, like a dumb animal trained on a shock collar and learned helplessness to the point of Stockholm syndrome
>>
>>544877096
How do you explain the theory of phycopaths in power then? Like CEO's and Politicians?
>>
>>544877619
why ask then?
and yeah, being a shitty person is a bad thing for everyone else around you. This is why the majority of people cooperate
>>
>>544878149
I guarantee you literally NOBODY thinks of muh butterfly effect before commuting crime.

They think of God.
>>
>>544877942
this is why I stoned my neighbour to death. He wore clothes mixed 2 types of fabrics and I saw him raking leaves on a saturday (shabbat)
>>
File: 1715563319590405.png (55 KB, 285x208)
55 KB PNG
>>544878852
>>544878363
>cant make a single post without talking about some theorem, syndrome, effect, or paradox

you collect theories like they're pokemon cards but you don't sound smart like you think you do, reddit nigger.

go back
>>
>>544878993
>the majority of people
*of irrelevant people
You are either too young or too naive.
>>
File: staline.gif (2.87 MB, 540x304)
2.87 MB GIF
>>544878617
>muh benevolent fortress of positive actions
cringe


now tell me what happens when picrel comes along?
>>
>>544878982
That one's easy. The first form of sapience to emerge was primitive sadism: monkeys bashing each other over the head with rocks. It let them gather many banans, trees, and other resources. Those sadistic monkeys breed, and get more stuff, then start giving resources to other monkeys as payment to do the dirty work for them.
Fast forward to today and we're literally THE de-facto Pirate/Bandit faction from video games. We've just slowly realized that to move any further we have to utilize eugenics and euthenization to eradicate sadism from the gene pool now that it's outlived its usefulness and is only a detriment.
But yeah, the super majority of politicians, CEOs and financial institutional families can primarily trace their lineage back to the most sadistic of monkeys who then turned the rest of the monkeys into mercenaries to do their bidding.
Now we're in an era of refinement of sapience, which means we hammer out the sadism from the hot iron as the slag it is.
>>
>>544878993
>>544879242
And that's not even the case with hoi polloi. Most hoi polloi will fuck you over given a slightest chance. The worst offenders in my experience were always bible thumpers. (No, I'm not an atheist.)
>>
>>544878999
>criminals think of god
Only after they abuse meth and get sent to prison and need to do 12 step programs to "prove" they are reformed, I assure you. Were they born with it or was it the brain damage and desperation? Who knows, too many unknown variables

>>544878982
>explain psychopaths in leadership positions
This is speculative, as I have no way to prove CEOs are or arent psycho/sociopaths and even that terminology isn't completely understood on a biology level to qualify consistently. But lets presume for the sake of argument it is: first off being poor and a psychopath doesnt get you anywhere except in jail or dead in a gang war. Being rich shelters you from the consequences of your actions and CEOs constantly have to make emotionally draining decisions so having reduced or no cognitive empathy can help you focus making leadership decisions that maintain your position on a pragmatic level even if those decisions arent the "best" they can still "work". But at the end of the day psychos are limited by their own biology just like the rest of us, and it shows by how ~90% of ventures fail. This may also explain why psychopaths are considered rare even if some people believe they are superior. Though there are a lot of prevailing misconceptions about what is a psychopath, there is a test. I highly recommend this video on the topic
https://youtu.be/H7haxkYwAaU
>>
File: FB_IMG_1787715140467.jpg (87 KB, 1080x1073)
87 KB JPG
>>544879143
>you think you are so smort reeeee just agree that Im right because thinking is too hard for me
>implying reddit users are smarter than him
Anon I- I dont think this is the flex you think it is
>>
>>544879733
Yeah i was just proding your ideas idk if its even true what i said.
>>
>>544876562
I'm not a good person. Not really. I just have never been in a situation where being explicitly bad would yield any benefit.
>>
>>544877770
Given that all money in existence is the product of fraud, stealing it is not even meaningfully worse than what has already been done by it merely existing.
>>
File: 1780551097981085m.jpg (128 KB, 1024x1001)
128 KB JPG
>>544876562
>>544876946
>>544878477
>>
File: honestly mane.jpg (118 KB, 750x715)
118 KB JPG
I am an infinitely recurring pattern, and I will continue to drink and do whatever I want desu
>>
>>544879880
nah it's because pseuds like you always rely on reddit ILoveScience! babble to justify your awful takes

you think because some scientist shat out some word soup with Theory™ attached that it lends credibility to your midwit argument
>>
>>544876562
there is no should without a stated objective
philosowank is one step above spiritfaggotry on the measure of fake and gay
>>
>>544880265
>>544880461
Well there is value in honesty, and while everything is a result of exploitation its worth noting there are levels of exploitation and intentionality. Participating in injustice to survive and feed your family is a lot more understandable and ethical than maintaining an unethical system because you want to maintain an elite position as a vanguard and key player of that system that refuses to improve conditions or compensate the disenfranchised
>>
>>544880810
>Ad hominem
Were it so easy to disprove my point then perhaps you would have constructive criticism or a valid rebuttal. Would you like some cheese with that whine?
>>
>>544877770
>embezzling money from the state
why would a christian bother doing this? even small time strip mall pastors can make a nice living fleecing christcuck retards, nevermind the top tier scumbag grifters like osteen etc who make millions.
>250k
lol
>>
>>544881235
>valid rebuttal

oh how cute, the niggermonkey said rebuttal. He's probably chortling about how smart he is

and I'll remind you, niggermonkey, why in fucks name should I care about muh morality if I don't believe in God? Because holding hands and singing songs is better for everybody? LOL
>>
>>544879263
What happens? Tell us.
Then tell us what do you do with traitors and enemies who are actively trying to destroy you, your country, and your people.
>>
>>544881478
>*dilating*
I have my reasons to believe what I believe even if I don't believe in afterlife or a spiritual point scoring system
>why should I care about morality if I don't believe in God
*god
And to answer your question well there is no singular reason. For starters because you can achieve far more and convince more people if people did't think you were an insufferable discontent twat. But for what its worth no one is forcing you to believe anything, you are the one trying to convince the rest of us being miserable like you is worthwhile.
>>
>>544881478
>>544881235
You are both wrong and right at the same time. Stop fighting like two little girls and come to a realization that both cooperation and empathy are builtin features (by God, evolution, the alien engineer, or the AI that's controlling all your emotions right now because you are a shitty buggy program in the Matrix) but without an irrational belief in an irrational theory of God, humans would not have achieved any meaningful progress and would not have secured their place as an apex predator because instead of cooperating and surviving that'd still be stealing each others dinners and bashing the weakest's heads in because they could.
>>
>>544882200
> you both have good points but have you considered GAWD
Well thats a reductive and eurocentric take. Buddhism is way older than christianity or judaism for that matterand was wrestling with these moral philosophic concepts ling before monotheism was relevant to society. You could just as easily claim Gilgamesh or Buddhist atheism was responsible for the development of civilization (presuming oral traditions of earlier people had no impact)
>>
File: 1740917181020010.png (27 KB, 888x849)
27 KB PNG
>>544881949
>tell us what do you do with traitors and enemies who are actively trying to destroy you, your country, and your people.
You vote for them not once, not twice, but three times.
>>
File: 1593641675131.jpg (111 KB, 1024x506)
111 KB JPG
>>544882137
>I have my reasons
A compelling argument.
>>
>>544882843
>Buddhism is way older than christianity or judaism
yikes
you DO belong on plebbit.
>>
>>544876562
I do what I like
>>
File: 1784388290644392.jpg (414 KB, 1080x1066)
414 KB JPG
>>544883317
>>
>>544882843
>reductive
>eurocentric
>Buddhist atheism

the reddit on this pseud fag is nauseating. Should I even bother mentioning that both Gods and Karma (literally central to Buddhism) exist? Or is this reddit moron too far gone?
>>
File: 1766331244519811.jpg (97 KB, 1024x681)
97 KB JPG
>>544883454
>>
>>544883459
It's worse than that too: per their "science", buddhism is a product of hinduism which was literally invented by the late-18th-to-mid-19th century london jewery (aka intelligentsia) to keep bureaucratic rulling class of hindus larping as if that shithole of a tea-growing colony ever was anything but a shithole. The rest of mythology followed.
whatever.
>>544883600
you obviously belong with them plebbit troons.
>>
File: 1772741391966255.png (32 KB, 473x445)
32 KB PNG
>>544883629
>you won, tranny
>>
File: img_1_1792033007427.jpg (191 KB, 1080x1204)
191 KB JPG
>>544883350
Well I could elaborate but as you could see from the thread, theories and actual data is not well received here if it violates childish groupthink
>>544883427
>yikes
I never said I believe in buddhism , just pointing out how fallacious it is to presume religion invented everything, let alone christianity which is basically a knockoff of a knockoff of a knockoff of a religion
>>
File: 1625506365949.png (808 KB, 960x956)
808 KB PNG
>>544883721
>I could elaborate
Again, very compelling. I accept your concession.
>>
>>544876562
Better for whites to be selfish anyway.
>>
>>544883459
>GAWD created buddhism and Karma
>>544883629
>their buddhist "science" was created by polytheistic Hindus
There is no reasoning with retards who just make up whatever strawman fallacy they want believe. Religion didnt make up science, mathematics did. Religion however did execute early scientists like Galileo because religioids are insecure barbaric sycophants larping as moralfags
>>
>>544876562
Oh, we so called "atheists" believe in Karma. It totally exists. It is something internal to the being.
>>
>>544876917
>Being good always pays off
Not really. I've been good all my life. Didn't get shit for it.
>>
>>544877115
I am completely for fairness, in all cases. It's why I am a National Socialist.
>>
>>544883780
>ignores my previous arguments
>i accept your concession
Your beliefs are made up, so it doesnt really change anything if you make a strawman to feel secure in your confirmation bias. Im still dont believe in your imaginary friend regardless, cope
>>
>>544877770
>Only one fears damnation.
The other fears Society.
>>
File: 1769091542291709.png (327 KB, 900x900)
327 KB PNG
>>544883898
>incoherent hurr durr
>>
>>544884049
What about damnation by society?
a-ha!
>>
>>544876562
Because I want to be a good person. People like good people, and I like myself if I'm being good.
Plus the world as a whole becomes better when people are good to one another.
So it DOES benefit me.
>>
>>544876562
Atheists absolutely believe in karma
>>
>>544877115
>have an innate desire to be fair
It was instilled by your environment.
You are just not sentient enough to be able to see that.
>>
>>544884049
One should fear creating a world worse than the one they live in. And despite the meme our world is a collection of societies. We live in them.
>>
>544883898
>544884007
Your (You) supply is cut off. I suggest returning to Reddit.

>>544884049
>fears Society

How much greater it is to fear God Almighty than mortal man.
>>
>>544883942
>we so called "atheists" believe in Karma. It totally exists. It is something internal to the being.
you speak for all atheists?
>>
>>544884134
>How much greater it is to fear God Almighty than mortal man.
Sovereignty of self: does man have authority over me or God?
>>
File: 1792796882117280.jpg (122 KB, 512x768)
122 KB JPG
>>544884063
>*chimps out anti-intellectually*
Mfw I don't respond to disingenuous goalpost moving and accept my intellectually superiority picrel
>>
>>544884188
>It totally exists. It is something internal to the being.
It could be argued that manifestations of states of mind have been observed. The dynamics and mechanics are secondary to the result.
>>
>>544884112
Only the atheist buddhists do. I think its flawed and silly concept as I dont believe in souls or reincarnation
>>
>>544876562
>why bother being a good person?
That is kike rhetoric.
>>
File: 1777168775694008.png (611 KB, 853x1000)
611 KB PNG
>>544884262
>>*chimps out anti-intellectually*
>>
>>544876562
If by "be a good person", you mean "be a Christian", then they can't, because atheists don't believe in Christ.
>>
File: 1780248185536401.png (429 KB, 399x614)
429 KB PNG
reason equals virtue equals happiness
>>
>>544876562
>If you are atheist... why bother being a good person?
It's beneficial to society. If you need a supernatural reason to be a good person, you aren't one.
>>
>>544884340
What is "reason"?
>>
>>544876917
>Being good always pays off
It does not. Epstein class aren't good but they are pleasuring themselves. Good guys are sad and lonely.
>>
>>544884366
Why care about society or anyone but yourself if you're an atheist? You are your own universe.
>>
>>544884394
It's when you logically connect pieces of data from your sensory inputs. That's all you need for morality
>>
>>544876562
Whatever you do is completely irrational but you do it anyway. It comes down to aesthetix and what feels gud
>>
>>544884540
>You are your own universe.
until my own universe acts in accordance with your god and you FREAK the fuck out
>>
>>544884366
I also believe this. But, how do you cope with the injustice of seeing wicked people not only getting what they want but being respected and admired for being prideful and powerful with no outward indication of feeling remorse or regret. How do you explain that it's better to be virtuois when virtue doesn't pay off and can even isolate you from people who feel threatened by it?
>>
File: 1777036972771456m.jpg (213 KB, 1024x746)
213 KB JPG
>>544876562
>dude god told moshe and his band of jews to kill and rape kids like muslims, if you don't worship him you can't be le good like the prophet muhammad was
Is that what you're going with?
>>
File: 1779138764643974.png (13 KB, 780x281)
13 KB PNG
>>544884559
>sensory
so, a priori knowledge is out of the question then
>logically
Cool. Which type of logic?
Because based on the type of logic, the
>virtue
definition may change.
>happiness
well, that's pretty subjective, ain't?
>>
>>544884694
>Is that what you're going with?
No, it isn't.
>>
>>544884601
But atheists were the most violent group by far in the 20th century. Like holy shit atheists killed and oppressed a lot of people.
>>
>>544884787
I just want to be a good person like prophet muhammad and moshe, but secular law prohibits me from murdering and wifing up children. What do?
>>
>>544884922
but dont worry they got their "reasons" and they're trying really hard to not be a "piece of shit"
>>
>>544884633
And that's the conundrum, ain't it?
Especially when them injustices aren't just observed but are experienced by own skin.
>>
This thread was moved to >>>/bant/25228904



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.