>Why aren't young people fucking anymore? About 21%, roughly 1 in 5 of U.S. women ages 18 to 29 are virgins.>Femcels are real, kek.But About 24%, roughly 1 in 4 of U.S. men ages 18 to 29 are virgins.>Incels are real but it isn't much of a gap.
>>544913262If you put your penis in a vagina that another man has cummed in, you are a faggot. If you fuck a woman alongside another man, you are a faggot. Don't be a faggot.
>>544913262femoids of coursethey are the ones who allow wars to happen by voting the way of the jews
>>544913339Look at this chandaal over here.
>>544913555checked and kekked. You guys are doing a good job at ragebaiting but you can be a whore all you want it doesn't affect me LOLI just feel bad for the sucker who has to eat the cum out of your pussy
>>544913262https://youtu.be/p9Y4YrwjPIo
>>544913835I am a 43 year old man, you subhuman filth.
>>544913262why do you care so much about sex?Have you ever heard of chastity?
>>544913367>wars happen because of how people vote
>>544915067Yeah? Literally, yeah? What are you, retarded?
>>544913262>About 21%, roughly 1 in 5 of U.S. women ages 18 to 29 are virgins.No, blatant bullshit
>>544915863Get a load of this guy. It's called a uni party, pal. Y'know, controlled opposition and all that.
>>544916214people who werent of the uniparty get no vote from jew loving women
>>544916088Old man, that is 7 year old data. My data is from the 2025 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).
>>544913262The difference is that virgin females gain value through scarcity the longer they are virgins compared to the inverse for male incels.
>>544914819Congratulations on your bottom surgery!!! <3 have fun dilating!!
>>544917760You must be right around the mean Indian IQ, huh? 75? Definitely a kanjar. Is your cognitive architecture even equipped to process the nuances of purely speculative or counterfactual paradigms? I am inclined to believe that you lack the fundamental linguistic competence required to decipher the semantic significance of the lexical choices I am currently deploying. In your preliminary asseverations, you posited that I possessed the characteristics of a woman. Subsequently, however, you have pivoted to propounding the conjecture that I am, in fact, a transvestite. It is absolutely imperative that you rectify this egregious inconsistency in your narrative and formulate a singular, coherent, and accurate ontological assessment of precisely whom you presume me to be.
>>544913262Neither, Jews are the problem.
