they also broke bucks and stood in bayonet musket lines
The founders were masonic liberals and the nation they founded and the Constitution have been failures. Can we please stop idolizing these guys like they're some type of religious fathers with all the answers?
>>544946508Why is masonry bad?
>>544946639Research statements about jews and lucifer made by masons and get back to us.
>>544946639Masonry use to be in opposition to the international jewish cabal but was, of course, like everything else, co-opted by said organization
>>544946723I looked up both of these and didn't see anything problematic
>>544946113fpbp>>544946925This guy gets it
>>544946113I refute thee peasant
>1PBTIDYou're refuted.
>>544946113all constitutions are gay as hell, yes
>>544946113And yet, even that old-school Getty homo shit looks like the fucking Undertaker compared to today's average leftoid.
>>544946113That's a bit like saying that laws today are signed by old white males with short, uncovered hair, wearing suits and leather shoes.It's just their uniform.
>>544946113Dandies were not homosexual, to assert so is reinforcing traditional masculine values and undermining the whole idea that liberalism is acceptable as a social movement.
>>544946113That is a pretty good observation, made me lol.I kinda wonder how they got to that place you know in the first place.THose faggy british homos still do that clown show.
>>544946723>>544946639>>544946508People give the Masons shit when they have been sensible throughout history. The French Revolution was started by Masons who were moderate royalists and moderate Republicans. Non-Mason retards on both the right and the left were responsible for all the violence
>>544949724What does that mean that the law is something abstract and god given or should the law be adjusted to the people.
>>544946113Responses like that are why the left are hated.
This might be one of the most retarded takes I have ever seen. Are people seriously trying to gaslight us into believing George Washington is a drag queen?
>>54494611322 is middle aged?
>>544949956I m 40 3/4.
it amazes me how conservatives consistently fail to understand that the things they defend were implemented by progressives. the founding fathers were the progressives of their time, and the conservatives of the time called them woke and gay in the same way.just this refusal to accept or understand that there is a role for social progress, while applauding the social progress of the past. it's not even a rejection of policy - which would be defensible. it's just blinkered close-mindedness.not that it matters.
>>544946113/slide threat>sage
>>544946925this. my dad is a freemason out of Indiana, and it's just an old man's club. They mainly do charity work with Shriner's Hospital, specifically for children. I've been to an auction they hosted once, it was mainly woodwork from boomer freemasons that are retired and have nothing better to do. Freemasonry may have one point been an evil org, but nowdays it's just a fraternity for boomers.
>>544946113I like how 15 years ago this bitch would never be able to do anything other than be a prostitute after a comment like that
Thats the benefit of a society that actively suppresses homosexuality. Men can dress in any style, any fashion, without fear of attracting the sexual attention of other males.By normalizing the presence of flagrant homosexuality, people not wishing that sort of attention or interaction need to create barriers to avoid it.Because its impossible for you to interact with society in a manner that isn't sexual, by choosing to force your sexual preferences into the awareness of those around you since you are incapable of identifying with life in a non-sexual manner and your entire identity is your broken sexual preference, you ruin society.Stop letting Make Dick Feel Good be your motivation in life. Stupid faggots, stfu
>>544946113>Hostess jackets>Silk hose>Shoes with enormous buckles and heelsLol, delusional shit for brains with zero understanding spouting garbage.Pic related was the revolutionary fashion and was a rebellion against the pompous dress of British aristocrats.https://fashionarchives.org/the-revolution-of-fashion/So not only is she wrong, but the ones dressing in drag was the redcoats.
>>544951001
>>544946113>Mrs. Betty Bowers is a long-running satirical comedy character known as "America's Best Christian," created by Andrew Bradley and portrayed by Canadian comedian and model Deven GreenOddly, there's no famous Muslim or Jewish parody character. But it's a big chortle from the entertainment industry if you defile Christianity.
>>544946995why are you lying
>>544946508The founding fathers are up there with ccp and nsdap as the greatest groups of people to have ever lived.Obviously you are seething because of how antijew they were.
>>544946113The older i get the more i understand why they wore wigs, fancy jackets, silk white leggings, black heels with big buckles. It made them look based that's why.
>>544946113founding fathers prob had more testosterone than all of men of gen z right now combined.
>>544952072They also had no cameras so they could always look smooth like silver fox pimps in the paintings they comissioned
they didn't tolerate fags/thread
>>544946113It was written by men who presented themselves as men back then did. They did not present themselves as women, i.e., it was not written by drag queens. Honestly, anyone thinking that's a clever gotcha is so dumb that they should be shot for the betterment of mankind. I'm so tired of retards saying retarded shit and declaring themselves victorious.
>>544946113Heh. You know, if you think about it, it's kinda funny that their political movement is the most fanatically obsessed with cultural relativism in history, and yet this thought betrays that they have absolutely zero understanding of the idea they've adopted. Powdered wigs, silk jackets and hose, and men's heels were NOT what a crossdresser of the time would wear. In their cultural context, this was the uniform of a prominent heterosexual white man, not a woman or most gay men.
>>544946508>the nation they founded and the Constitution have been failures.Only because we didn't follow what many of the Founding Fathers thought about keeping out jews.The US would have been so much more long-lived had restrictions on jews been codified in the Constitution.
