https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-ai-bubble-has-already-burst-2026-10-26/
>>544971331And? Link and run spamming faggot.
>>544971331well thats simply because their ai is still 2017 tech lol
>>544971331China banned sexbots because they're a bunch of retarded prudes. No shit investors are pulling out.
Space race 2.0
>>544971331Guess they didn't import enough jeets to win le AI race
>>544973667They banned sexbots because their population is in collapse like everybody else
>>544975619if they cared about population collapse then they'd go after their feminist judges and laws that punished only men in rape accusations and divorcesthe only reason they'd have to go after sexbots is because they want even more totalitarian control over their people
>>544972481This is the only answer. People should be paying attention to the AI race closely. China at its current peak couldn't hold a candle to the yanks despite the constant ear beating you'll hear online saying otherwise. This, fundamentally, was a war of technology and the Chinese lost in brutal fashion despite the posturing. The obvious path available to them is just blanket banning the western competition in China so their users are forced to use DeepSeek or whatever other second rate Chinese alternative exists. Not even saying that's a bad thing, it highlights the massive advantage China has as essentially a fascist country. They truly can just take their ball and play on their own without getting completely captured by some foreign industry
>>544971331>AI bubble is not a thing tranny>china over taking AI industry>AI BUBBLE IS ABOUT TO BURST.... IN CHINA
>>544976133The US is going to be the retarded sucker in the end. Chinks will just distill the models and give it to the world for free. Meanwhile, the US economy will crumble because they based half their economy on a technology they can't protect
>>544971331chink stock exchange is fake and gay.liyerally designed to trap and harvest "chives"
>>544976133Insane projection
>>544977357Chinas problem is they think they can be world leaders by copying and stealing. Turns out you actually can't and they're finding out the hard way.
>>544978437You can get away with it if you copy from a regime that's universally despised
>>544978554Obviously not. If stealing and copying was the path to success China would have the best AI in the world. They don't, and they never will.
It's always some neo-bolshevik spiteful mutant that's crying out "e-every o-one hates you, A-Am-America!!!!"
>>544978596>but muh benchmarks!And what do you think capitalism will do when AI companies need to start raising revenue to pay down their insane debt?
>>544979136The ones that can will survive and grow, the ones that can't will vanish. It's that simple.