[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1788292804877183.jpg (681 KB, 2162x1874)
681 KB JPG
Because if evolution is not true, this means that it must have been a non-material creator. Which means angels, the kingdom of heaven and other things are also real.

So answering this question is one of the most fundamental things you can do.
>>
Evolution is fake but Zues is actually the real God, (NOT ZEUS DONT GET THEM CONFUSED)
>>
>>545035423
Niggers are proof evolution is real and different groups of humanoids evolved around very different circumstances.
>>
>What is abiogenesis
>>
God's a faggots and the angels are even bigger faggots

Fuck off golem zoomer kike!!
>>
File: 1782557826991485.jpg (423 KB, 1439x1282)
423 KB JPG
>>545035423
do humans pass on markers to their offspring?

sure, as is the will of god
>"And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good."
- Genesis 1:12
>>
>>545035612
the term kike is in reference to those who hate christ
>>
Fuck off with your jewish fairy tales. And yes humans were created by the annunaki about 250000 years ago. They came here and found compatible primates and mixed in some of their own DNA.
This is documented by actual texts and genetic science, not some plagiarized abrahamic bullshit written by lying kikes.
>>
Article arguing against evolution based on irphan genes and protein complexity
https://xenosarc.substack.com/p/from-a-mathematical-and-logical-standpoint

>>545035561
Abiogenesis has never been proven to work

And it faces other problems, like the lack of error correction
>>
>>545035612
Angel here,
I'm personally going to fuck you up for the rest of your life.
>>
>>545035423
>molecular machines
improper wording by religiontards to make it seem like they are "designed"
>>
File: 1786754724830724.jpg (282 KB, 1080x1050)
282 KB JPG
>>545035679
>abrahamic bullshit
Well maybe the OT isn't what we're told it is
>>
>>545035423
Logic flaw. „Evolution can only happen step by step, not spontanously“. That is not true. It is survival of the fittest. Mutations that pay of have higher chances to reproduce. But a mutation can be something complex…an extra finger for example. Someone is just born with it, not generations that are born with a little bit of a finger untill one day everyone has a extra finger…
>>
>>545035779
You personally going to shit in diapers faggot
>>
>>545035930
A finger is not a new feature. It is something for which DNA already exists in the genome.
>>
File: 1782891130741874.jpg (9 KB, 235x250)
9 KB JPG
>>545035423
I am privy to information only certain people are, in not going to go into detail as i dont want to compromise my identity
>>
>>545035679
Based fellow rh negative blood haver
>>
>>545035806
The entire bible is completely ripped off from older stories. Though the flood and other things did happen, the bible rewrites it to put kikes at center stage. Also they purposefully skipped a lot of important things, like the spacecraft, nephilim, giants, etc. There's much much more to those parts that the kikes left out.
They also dumbed a bunch of it down so that 5 year olds would understand and believe it.
>>
>>545035423
it's fake and gay
>>
File: 3.jpg (107 KB, 1080x867)
107 KB JPG
>>545036276
The OT is suspicious and the NT, naturally doesn't really deal with deep history.

The NT is a redemption arc, not a deep history book. Yes, Atlantis and cataclysms were likely real.
https://xenosarc.substack.com/p/event-x-and-the-end-of-this-cycle
The end of the world is also real. I think these verses might hint at a micronova.
2 Peter 3:9-13, Luke 21:33, John 14:1-3, Matthew 13:36-43, Matthew 24:29-30, etc
>>
>>545035423
Evolution seems to be true, by which I refer to the fact that (1) no example have yet been made of a non-evolutionary mechanism behind evolutionary events, such as the evolving antibiotic resistance among Staphyloccocus aureus and (2) no example has been made of a non-evolutionary prediction not held true, for instance it has never been the case that antibiotics do not drive antibiotic resistance in bacteria. These are laboratory findings with empirical weight that are hard to ignore. If you could suppose an alternative explanation of why bacteria aquire genetic mutations that mediates antibiotic resistance or suppose an example when such development is not seen in laboratory then of course one would have to reconsider.
>>
>>545035423
when you multiply a non zero chance by the size of the universe you get a result. stupid nigger thread

"but muh there are more ways to fold a protein than there are atoms in the universe!" this isnt an argument either, its just more low iq bait for people like you who selectively believe in shit thats fits whatever you want to believe in
>>
>“Do not let your hearts be troubled. You believe in God[a]; believe also in me. 2 My Father’s house has many rooms; if that were not so, would I have told you that I am going there to prepare a place for you? 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am.
John 14
>>545036928
Even if this were true, the probability of evolution being true is much lower than mainstream sciemce claims and this can be easily proven. But this is not being admitted. Wonder why.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.