[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


No matter how you look at it, it seems utterly impossible to objectively consider any form of interaction with women except maybe pumping and dumping a beneficial endeavor. I don't understand why so many niggers on here and on the rest of the internet give so much shit about what w*men think, say and do when it's self-evidently in their best interest to avoid them as one does a pack of feral niggers at 3AM in a dark alley. Maybe the math was different back in the day when divorce wasn't a thing and there was literally nothing to do other than mowing the lawn and fucking your wife, but the things have changed. marriage is a dead institution and casual relationships aren't any better. even having children isn't much of a motivator when you realize they're going to grow up as bottom-feeders in a miscegenated jewish shithole world order that's unironically worse than anyone could even imagine just a few decades ago.

so again, why bother with w*men at all?

ai_slop.png related
>>
>>545042477
Your bringing math into biology
>>
>>545042477
Get married and don't have kids then. Simple
>>
>>545042962
converting everything into $ is just a way of making the comparison possible. and when you do make the comparison, marriage reveals itself as an entirely irrational choice, and love/lust an equivalent to narcotics and gambling.

>>545043031
you still lose your autonomy, free time, energy and money and all you get in return is some emotional support (as long as you don't give her the ick) and occasional sex (until she figures out the neighbor fucks better and starts having headaches). it absolutely does not seem like an equivalent exchange.
>>
You’re attempting to bring rationality to a place where it simply doesn’t live.

Getting to the end of your life and dying without having had children is the deepest and darkest form of misery a person can experience. Period.
I worked among the elderly for many years.
Some make more of an attempt to hide it than others, but no one does so successfully.

Enduring misery and loneliness at that age is not the same as it is in one’s youth.
The testosterone and physical fortitude that lends itself to emotional resolve is gone.
There are no replacements; your friendships gradually dissolve as you become enfeebled, and no one is really interested in or capable of forging new ones.
The extent to which elderly childless people are truly and deeply alone with nothing but their thoughts and regrets cannot be overstated.
>>
>>545042477
YOU FAGGOTS ARE DISGUSTING
>>
>>545042477
Finances are external, the metaphysical is the soul and the body. To reproduce your image you need a woman, and if you don't want to have a completely miserable experience siring children, you need to have a good monogamous relationship with a woman. Society makes that difficulat but we could fix that by restricting women's "rights" (privileges since women dont take on any responsibilities at all for their attainment of any rights, and if they by accident do take on any responsibility they act like a victim for any responsibility and wish to be treated as something between an adult and a child)
>>
>>545044500
why the hell should a happy single guy produce some godforsaken offspring that ruins his life?>>545042477
The numbers are wrong substract another 10k/year for sex, drugs and rock'n'roll so outcome ist +240k
>>
>>545043718
those elderly lived their lives in different times and under a different social contract. but that world no longer exists, and trying to recreate it will, statistically speaking, end up fucking you over far more than just dying alone. and even if you do make it work, it's still far from a foolproof solution. you might die of a heart attack tomorrow, or your children might get blown up in a drone strike or they might grow apart and leave you to still die alone. entertainment-wise, there's games, porn, ai and so many other alternatives for human relationships today that i'd expect one to be able to manage their regrets and loneliness for the most part. and at the end of the day, you're going to die regardless of what you did in life, and if you've mostly made rational choices during your life, you should be able to meet it with a stoic mindset.

>>545044500
removing women's rights would help balance the equation somewhat, but it wouldn't actually change anything. even in a relationship where the woman is guaranteed not to betray you, you still have to put in far more time, effort, energy and money while barely getting anything in return. the cost-benefit equation does not favor cohabitation with a woman.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.