Because no serious person (that does things like modelling/predictions), relies on something like "average births per woman".

The simplest way I can explain it to the layperson is, imagine if a car is doing 100 kmph on a road, while another is stopped completely. In that moment, the "average speed per car" is 50 kmph but that doesn't really tell you what's happening on the road.

A similar thing is happening with the people of European descent. Those that fall for anti-natalist propaganda (whatever form that takes be it trooning out, being fags or the hetrosexual couple that decides not to have children because of climate change or "white guilt"), that these people won't make it to the next generation.

The problem with the image is that it's just naively projecting the current average into the future. Which isn't a great model, those that had 0 children have been removed from the next generations right, and especially after two or three rounds of this, assuming anti-natalist propaganda continues then all it's going to do is continue to weed out the low fertility people. Something like the black death wiped out a third of the population in Europe as it ravaged through the population but then the survivors were all those that could fight off the infection, so they breed and with time the whole population develops immunity.

What's blowing up the nigger population (like in Somalia) is all the food aid and western medicine they get, largely from white people. So if in fact the number of whites keeps falling, like that naive model projects, that's exponentially less farmers to feed niggers, so even then you should also get a nigger population collapse (since there won't be enough whites to feed/care for them).

>>545074313
the birth rate has been going down for many generations now. there is no identifiable group in america that has 6 kids on average per couple. youre dumb

>>545074313
couldn't africans also procure food and medicine from non white countries? i don't see how say china or india wouldn't also be able to provide such services

>>545074624
China produces a lot, but the vast majority of what it grows (rice, cereals) is for domestic consumption. And they are very ethnocentric and will 100% not care if niggers are starving, they will put their own first. In short, 86% of the world's food (things you need to survive) is grown in the northern hemisphere. The tropics might grow something like coffee or even oranges, but these are for your morning coffee or orange juice, it's not something you could live on. This system is also dynamic though, maybe the South American countries will pivot into essentials as there are less people that want coffee and so on. But it's not enough to merely look at the agricultural sector but where most of the essentials (that can sustain millions) are grown from.

What makes things more complicated is that the likes of Ukraine, which is known as like a breadbasket of Europe, they've lost like 50% of their population and their ports are being blockaded (so grain can't get to nigger countries). I don't think anyone could've foreseen this 5-10 years ago in any model. It's bad for the niggers. That grain will get dumped in places like Poland instead and then what will Polish farmers do? Etc. It's a dynamic system. This doesn't even get into the supply chain, like you need fertiliser to keep crop yields high (what do you need for that, fossil fuels).

>>545074313
Ok, but don't you see a problem with the nigger populations falling into famine while white populations shrink and import niggers? You'll be trying to fight off hordes of starving niggers while nigger "Italians" are opening the literal gates.

>>545074984
Dosent Putin subsidize the Ukrainian losses of grain in Africa now? I remember they said they would cover like 6 countries total grain one was Burkina Faso the other was Somalia

>>545073770
Diversity is our strength

Well, have sex then (you won't)