Why do so many Holocaust deniers appeal to empiricism and “just following the facts” when their own ideological commitments often precede their conclusions?There's an obvious tension between claiming to be a detached, objective observer and being invested in a worldview that determines which evidence you accept.If contradictory evidence is always dismissed as fabricated or part of a conspiracy, are you really being a positivist, or just LARPing as an empiricist?Can you reconcile the two, or is the appeal to objectivity just a rhetorical tool?
Revelation 2:9Revelation 3:9Romans 2:28-29Philippians 3:31 John 2:22-232 John 1:9-11You don't even need to engage with pilpul. Just post these Bible verses in their entirety or in part. You don't even need to elaborate.
