>The only industries that are growing (healthcare and education) don't want men to be nurses or teachers because people think men are violent animals who will rape/murder the weak if left alone with themWhat is the solution here
>>545088052>Source>My ass
I don't think it's hard for a man to be a nurse or a teacher he just doesn't want to wipe asses or babysit little retards for $60k a year
>the only industries growing are the ones you can't trust
prove them right by raping and murdering them until they surrender and retake your country from mentally ill HR ladies, jews and shitskin invaders.
>>545088107I was gonna say 60k doesn't sound so bad, but when you consider you can drive a fedex truck for slightly more and just deliver boxes I guess you're right.
>>545088052Neither of those is an industry. It is a service. One of the reasons America is dying is because (((certain people))) decided to elevate service sector jobs to that of an “industry” as though they produce wealth in some way; but they do not. They only consume energy, materials, labour, and products in order to facilitate an outcome. ROI is not guaranteed on the results, so at a systemwide level it’s just a massive transfer of money into the hands of administrators, investors, and occasionally practitioners on the ground. At no point does any wealth creation occur. To make wealth you must be improving the value of a natural product. Iron is worth more in a rod than it is in the ground. Silicon is worth more when it it’s etched with a processor than when it is just a refined product. You have to be adding value, physically, to something in order for real wealth creation to occur.
>>545088100source is Bureau of Labor Stats
>>545088052Education isn’t growing. Only healthcare is growing. And plenty of men can and do become nurses nobody actually cares
>>545088566Okay then. Sign up to work in a mine then. Who is stopping you?
>>545088566?Why are you stipulating physical for 'wealth creation?' Art and media are perfectly capable of creating wealth for people and there's various examples both currently and historically.Also, there's nothing wrong or shameful etc. with bunkering down and focusing on a domestic media industry so that people are at least happy, entertained, fulfilled, etc. even if they are not 'internationally rich' which is what you are largely talking about.It only really matters if you intend to stretch such industry into matters of war/empire, otherwise there's no particular glory in the creation of wealth one way or the other.
>>545088052women work on themselves, incel
>>545088566>doesn't understand basic jargon on the topic>can't into words>tries to be pedanticmany such cases
