[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (23 KB, 365x547)
23 KB JPG
For those who support Palestine mostly over the casualty ratios: was Imperial Japan the WW2 victim worth supporting then? Was North Korea one too?

Japan attacked first. Pearl Harbor killed about 2,400 Americans. The US response included the firebombing of Tokyo in March 1945, around 100,000 dead in a single night. Then Hiroshima and Nagasaki, between 110,000 and 210,000 dead by the end of 1945, mostly civilians. In total, US bombing killed hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians. The casualty ratio was far more one-sided than in Gaza. Yet almost nobody calls Japan the victim of that war, and there were no mass pro-Japan protests, because of the Japanese regime's atrocities, terrorizing the whole region and joining the Axis. Having mass civilian casualties doesn't change who's in the wrong when you have a warmongering military dictatorship.

Korea. In 1950, North Korea invaded the South. US bombing destroyed most North Korean cities, and North Korean civilian deaths are estimated in the hundreds of thousands, possibly over a million. Again a huge imbalance in losses. And again, almost nobody thinks the North was in the right.

Civilian deaths are a tragedy in any war, and specific strikes can and should be criticized. But if counting bodies is your only argument, then by that logic you'd have to side with Imperial Japan and Kim Il Sung.

The conclusion is simple: a casualty ratio alone doesn't tell you who's right. What matters is who started the war, what kind of regime is on the other side, and what it takes to end the war.
>>
>>545095242
israel is founded on a lie by terrorists so they are in the wrong no matter which way you try and cut it.

also doing 911 was foul they need a made in USA nuke to Tel Aviv for that before any Iranians get their turn.
>>
>>545095242
People don't support Jews because they are subversive pieces of shit.
Hope this clears things up.
>>
I just don't get why a nation as filthy rich as Israel doesn't just buy the land? Jews will always own all the land if given time thanks to usury so I don't understand why they didn't just do what God commanded?
>>
damn I am swayed nice work
>>
>>545095242
Jews are using my money and my military to do things that directly damage my country
>>
>>545095242
>The conclusion is simple: a casualty ratio alone doesn't tell you who's right
True, but neither does "who committed the most atrocities," or "who committed the biggest atrocity," or "who committed the first atrocity." You implicitly acknowledge this in your analysis through noting that the ends justify the means ("ending the war" takes priority over preventing suffering).

The biggest factor in deciding whom one should support in any war is, "Who is on my side?" You can align yourself with whomever you like. But the only true metric by which we judge the viability of one side over the other is kinship.

Muslims are not my kin. But jews have expressed racial hatred for me and those I love. I can't support a group that hates me and seeks to destroy everything I care for, especially in what they accuse me of and use as justification for my people's genocide.
>>
>>545095242
FDR only cared about Japan because the DELANO family made their fortune selling opium to China and the Japanese were muscling in on their drug trade routes.

Fuck that traitor. The Jews killed Huey Long to get that worthless cripple into office.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.