[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


This is why we need feminism.
>>
>>545098201
If only women made up 3/4ths of the casualties instead...
>>
>>545098201
>1 in 4 a woman
>So 3 in 4 was a man
The world ends,women most effected
>>
2 in 4 were transwomen but they weren't counted
>>
>>545098201
>rookie numbers
>we gotta pump those numbers up
>>
>>545098201
1/4 women
1/4 non-binary personas
1/4 lesbians
1/8 children
1/8 seniles
Everyone else is a patriatchy enabler and deserved to die.
>>
The other 1/4 has moved to become a whore in a foreign country.
>>
>>545098201
So clearly the takeaway here is that we need more women in infantry because they have a higher survival rate.
>>
it should be 2 in 4 in the name of equality
>>
File: 16467.png (19 KB, 195x298)
19 KB PNG
>75% of violent crimes targeted men
>Think of the women
>>
>>545098324
>>545098792
>>545098954
all 4 deaths were caused by men though
women are always innocent yet still killed because men are violent animals
>>
>>545099146
Nuh uh
Women told me women can be soldiers and women are always right so clearly they're just better at war than guys and we should let them fight instead of telling them to go away
Imagine how much more effective our military will be with way more women doing things the right way
>>
>>545099146
I don't fucking care
>>
>>545099146
Woman started the war by voting 99% for mass immigration that imports mostly fighting aged men.

>If 99% of foreigners were "fighting age" woman (18-21).

They would vote 99% to not have immigration anymore. They just love having a higher mate-choice.
>>
>>545098201
>not the heckin feemaroonis

All jokes aside. In a generational total war scenario where you enemy seeks to exterminate you; you need every womb babymaxxing. 1 man could fill a maternity ward with future-soldiers.

Females are strategically more valuable but a tactical liability. If I am defending a fortress, they are merely another mouth to feed; if I am defending a race, religion, territory, culture, or future? Value is skewed toward females.
>>
>>545099146
>>545099356
>>545099250
Furthermore,

Male competition is spurred on by females. Women cause the entirety of: warfare, capital acquisition, scarcity, and discord amongst males. Men don't need to fight over small sleights to their ego nor feel the need to challenge rivals in the absence of a female gaze. He doesn't need a massive portfolio, he doesn't need a flashy car, he won't join the army to look tough. Women cause the majority of homicide and it's not even close.
>>
File: depop.jpg (3.82 MB, 4200x9944)
3.82 MB JPG
>>545098201
billions must die
especially poopjeets chinks and sand monkeys
>>
>>545099524
You're correct in defending, but they are also plunder.

A) If I conquer a land, many men in my army can take war brides.

B) If I feel I am going to lose, or not waging total war, raping the enemy's women provides the chance of creating bastards which are despised, another mouth to feed (possibly) and a demoralizing reminder of the war.
>>
>>545098201
those are rookie numbers. it should be more than 2. if they cared about equity, they'd take over all the dying for a while
>>
File: images.jpg (15 KB, 335x597)
15 KB JPG
>>545098201



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.