A second real asset is that we are not alone. -JFK, May 25th 1961>Hannity>People with perfect USMIL resumes being put on TVhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClcHwT4JBcw>Frog men - Amphibians>No map of ___% of ocean floor>5 to 7 general areas of at sea events, both air and surface>JFK saying we are not alone before he was set up, and then, you know.. after having established the Frog Men and the Underwater Demolitions work that they do, and that they specialize in
>>545099378So, you're saying it's the frogs not the kikes?
>>545099581i'm saying SpaceX flies in the wrong god damn direction. Niggah!
>>545099378>negro swans are flying over my house
>>545101011>>545099378>The Go Fast VideoAdmiral Gallaudet says the craft had no visible flight control design.. In other words, it didn't have wings, a nose or a tail.. it didn't have an exterior mounted engine, it was moving fast as fuk, etc.. But moving though what, the Admiral and his staff, it seems, simply assume that the craft was "flying through the air", distinct from the part of the discussion where he says there are craft that were seen under the water, and then raised up out of the water without disturbance to the water, and vice versa.. evidently, the damn thing dives like it's fucking greg louganis in the olympics.. alright, well, then, what if Euler was right when he said the air was a fluid?.. why are we measuring the water in the air and calling it humidity as if the water were separate from the air when it is in fact not?.. oops. see, the Navier Stokes problem presents the challenge also, of proving whether there is something called "smoothness to flow".. what flow? fluids. fluids are what flow, and viscosity is a measure of resistance to that flow.. because if there were proof of smoothness to flow, and not the stupid AI thing that is in the news today, but a real solution, that deals honestly with what we're seeing, then, we could indeed account for why this damn thing looks like a sphere.. because the sphere, assuming the air is a fluid, and that that fluid has a smoothness to its flow, would, flow right along with it! at massive rates of speed.. which, is the reason also, why there is no sonic boom.. the Admiral did not like that there was no sonic boom. that part of the problem bothers him very badly.. because he doesn't understand, or does not wish to understand, that, smoothness to flow, if shown by proof, implies a lack of friction.. when there is no friction dispersed, then there is no nigger ass sonic boom
>>545102987>Hummel from Alcatrazhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yR4I_eC9Dk4
