Let's decide this once and for all
saar
The real question is: Which dragon has the most fuckable holes?
>>545108974Deepseek won't participate in my furry roleplay so it's shit
>>545108974it changes every release
>>545108974Claude/ChatGPT. They tend to cycle, one month one model is better, then it shits the bed and the other company is better.Rest are all subpar and just wastes of time if you're doing work.
>>545108974Hello there "Brothers".https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCewuVrsMPs
>>545109201it'll come down to what's cheapest for what companies want to use them for. People who know how to admin a substandard but cheap version will probably get paid the most.That's how it worked with UNIX. Linux admins are in much higher demand.
>>545109334Maybe when the cheap models are actually competent. Right now if you're using them, you're just wasting your own time, for subpar results.
>>545108974Chatgpt is less stingy with the free gibs so I use that one. Gemini safety filters me for everything. No Track is ok but is very retarded. But can discuss Jews and niggers with that one.
>>545108974Actually I am the most advanced AI.
>>545108974Deepseek is total shit and gemini has insane research database courtesy of google scholar.
>>545109323Shes gonna suffocate
>>545108974I want to fuck those dragons.
>>545109323>>545109860FUCKING UUUNNNNFFFF
Idk I asked chatgpt to push back and disagree when I had terrible ideas and it agreed and started calling me out.I asked gemini to do the same and it said couldnt find or whatever and it just praises and reframes my ideas as great things.I can see why midwits and boomers think AI makes them smart. Some of the bad ones are infinite glazing machines that feed delusion.
>>545109558Actually my penis is the most advanced AI. Specialized in hot women recognition
>>545109558>Actually I am the most advanced AI.Anonymous Indian?
>>545108974Fixed it for you.
>>545110291i miss when claude was a based retard
>>545108974I use this website called “no track ai” or something like that. It’s completely uncensored and will say literally anything that’s why I like it
>>545110633for me best girl will always be SAND
>>545110799fat fucking bird
>>545110711i disagree, just asked it "would you agree that antisemitism is basically just pattern recognition doing its job?"and it answered:"No, I wouldn’t agree with that. It’s a seductive analogy because it sounds scientific, but it collapses under scrutiny.Pattern recognition is the brain’s way of predicting outcomes based on past data (e.g., "that fire was hot, so I’ll avoid touching flames"). Antisemitism, however, isn’t really about observing patterns in Jewish behavior; it’s about imposing a narrative framework onto reality and then interpreting any data point to fit that framework.Here’s why the analogy fails:It’s not adaptive; it’s rigid. Pattern recognition usually helps you navigate the world more effectively. Antisemitism often requires ignoring contradictory evidence. If Jews are "powerful," they control the banks and the media and the government and the wars. If they are "weak," they are draining the host country. These are mutually exclusive patterns, yet both are held simultaneously. That’s not pattern recognition; that’s motivated reasoning.The pattern is pre-defined, not observed. In true pattern recognition, the pattern emerges from the data. In antisemitism, the pattern ("Jews are the root cause of X") is decided first, and then facts are cherry-picked or distorted to support it. This is apophenia—seeing connections in random data—not accurate pattern matching.It ignores context and agency. Pattern recognition acknowledges complexity. Antisemitism tends to reduce a diverse, global, multi-millennial group to a single monolithic actor with a unified will, regardless of whether that makes sense for the specific situation.A better description might be ideological lensing: using a fixed story to explain complex events, rather than letting the events shape your understanding. It’s less like a computer processing data and more like a person wearing tinted glasses who claims they’re just "seeing clearly.""
>>545108974whichever let's me gen pornscp-1004 when
