[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


part 1
------------------------
I have devised a solution to the economic problem facing both of these systems.

The absence of a centralized currency—or any peg to the US dollar or the euro—for settling international trade in goods and services.
-------------------

The essence of this rather simple solution is as follows: without abolishing the US dollar or the euro as a means of international settlement, one would replace them in such transactions with a "price-projection token."

A "projected price token" can take the value of ANY currency in the world and use it as a benchmark for assessing the worth of goods and services—for instance, it could even take the Turkish lira or the Indonesian rupiah and, for a single day, designate it as the global "projected price" for trade settlements between nations. In this context, the specific price itself is entirely inconsequential; it serves merely as a tool, rather than acting as a source of leverage or pressure over countries—as was the case in the past when a single, unified global currency was used.

A "projection token" takes the price of a good or service and transforms the transaction into a pure barter mechanism, thereby reducing the costs (incidental losses) associated with trade. To utilize such a system, each country would need to establish its own international trade bank—an external-facing institution dedicated to handling transactions conducted via these virtual projection tokens (contracts). One might argue that this simply describes the mechanics of an exchange; however, the differences are fundamental. This is, in effect, resource-based trade between nations—backed by state guarantees and devoid of futures contracts. It is a debt-free, spot-settlement transaction.
>>
>>545114908
part 2
------------------------------
Pros for the European Union and BRICS...

Now, countries within these blocs will no longer depend on the US dollar as a global currency or on the euro as a single, bloc-wide currency. The use of these currencies will be significantly reduced. Countries will regain their economic independence—France will bring back its own currency, Germany will bring back its own, and so on. The value of a single global currency will no longer serve as a tool for exerting influence or manipulating the market. Greater decentralization and autonomy. This will help reduce trade costs—which will, in turn, affect the prices of goods and services—and will also have a positive impact on the domestic economies of individual countries, particularly regarding the production of goods and services within each nation.
There will also be positive consequences for the U.S., as the dollar will become a MORE stable currency—it will no longer be as heavily affected by inflation. Furthermore, the currencies of various nations could once again be pegged to a gold standard, much like in the mid-20th century.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.