[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Is marriage natural to humans?
>>
>>545180885
yes, humans are naturally monogamous
>>
>>545180928
Retard
>>
>>545180885
> killed by her husband
I doubt it. A Leo doesn't kill his lioness. She gives me Sagittarius self-harm vibes.
>>
File: 1721857891234695.jpg (10 KB, 350x334)
10 KB JPG
>>545180885
Poor kid
>>
>>545180885
He had prenut insanity
>>
>>545180928
Hence all the cheating.
>>
>>545180961
Commie wants us to be bonobos when we’re more like chimps. Get over it lefty. Monogamous parents have children that thrive.
>>
what race is that?
>>
>>545180961
Retardd, double "d" for double dose of retardedness.
>>
>>545181010
Nobody gives a shit. Just another mentally borken goy for the machine.
>>
>>545181037
You said
>naturally

You're a retard. I get the hots at least a little for any 8+/10. Honestly, you're just likely low t
>>
>>545180885
>marriage
no. marriage is the process of declaring your gf to the government.
it is different from just pairing up and having a gf.
>>
>>545181010
this
>>
>>545180885
not to goyim
>>
>I have nipples can you milk me
>>
>>545181044
His wife and kid looked kind of chinky but I’m not really sure. Christ we really have turned into Brazil.
>>
>>545180885
yes just not to white whores
>>
>>545181029
cheating is actually extremely uncommon
>>
>>545180928
Monogamous*. We seek pair bonding reproductive monogamy by default but there's a non-trivial tendency to cheat, switch partners, or participate in n-n relationship structures where n =/= 1. But yes all else being equal what your brain is wired to do by default is find one person and mate with them permanently
>>
File: stalker-2-a-life-broken.jpg (183 KB, 1200x630)
183 KB JPG
>>545181010
Such is life in the zone
>>
>>545181277
You know what else is extremely uncommon? Convolutions in your brain.
>>
File: 1777779315408735.mp4 (1.05 MB, 640x640)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB MP4
>>545181381
>your brain is wired to do by default is find one person and mate with them permanently
>>
>>545181092
Can’t refute that kids of monogamy parents are more likely to thrive, huh? Seethe lesser animal brained commie.
>>
Homo erectus was monogamous, although we are homo sapiens and our women have more slutty inclinations.
>>
Yes and no. It's natural to fall in love, have sex, make babies and raise them together. What's not not natural is feeling forced to do so under some government contract or a delusional covenant with a non-existent deity.
>>
Vaxx status?
>>
>>545181607
It more proves the point than refutes it that both sexes think the other one is more inclined to promiscuity. We take ourselves as the baseline, and view said behavior in the opposite sex as regrettably contrary to our own nature. In reality we're both on the same page and are merely oversensitive to the tendency in the objects of our desire because it wounds us
>>
>>545181608
wicked smaht poast
societal and contractual tension is real, even if you can't really see it on a day to day basis. wonder what the story is here, if only OP poasted a linky.
>>
stinky link:
https://nypost.com/2026/10/29/us-news/nurse-killed-by-husband-in-murder-suicide-just-weeks-after-she-gushed-how-they-couldnt-be-happier-2/
>>
>>545180885
SUOMI!!!!!!!!!! :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>>
>>545181720
Statused!
>>
>>545181858
clotted up brain could lead to sudden aggressive behavior.
>>
>>545181010
could be for the greater good of the kid.
>>
>>545181888
Source?
>>
File: IMG_6996.jpg (209 KB, 1024x856)
209 KB JPG
>>545180885
Kinda looks asian

So sny lindsey clancy supporters in this situation?
Or is it only when white women do this.
Whats with the shite on white violence
>>
File: j9brak7q60u61.jpg (113 KB, 680x709)
113 KB JPG
>>545180885
Is sucking dick natural to OP?
>>
>>545180928
X
>>
>>545181010
Too bad idf doesnt feel this for Palestinian kids

Doing hitlers job killing semites
>>
>>545181111
Checked and based
Humans have been pair bonding for hundreds of thousands of years before the (((government))) existed
>>
>>545181075
This is sad by true.
The jews need to be destroyed utterly and to the last to restore order.
>>
>>545181987
There's no order. Jews or schmews, from the position of 0.000.....1%, hoi polloi are a cattle. And they aren't wrong.
>>
File: 1785863418661666.png (83 KB, 1378x362)
83 KB PNG
>>545181514
>a lot of animals pair for life and will show depression and even suicide when their partner dies, usually the higher intelligent, social creatures, if you can't pair bond, you've likely been broken, also a problem for higher intelligence, to carry the burdens of trauma, some like to leave it at duality, others claim it's a flaw in god's design, however you cope, the species prefers to pair up, no matter how you spin your own psychological damages.
I wonder why he deleted this utter pile of verbal diarrhea.
>>
>>545180969
underrated. in all seriousness, she 'couldn't be happier' because she was fucking a doctor while he is only a PA so he did her in.
>>
>>545181607
>Homo erectus was monogamous
No, it wasn't.
>>
>>545180885
>Is marriage natural to humans?
Yes, pair bonding is common with mammals with extended juvenile cycles.

For reference we have the longest of all primates. Closest is orangutans who achieve maturity about 10 to 15 years old while humans usually have a longer puberty and reach sexual maturity at about 15+ (in terms of fully developing).
>>
>>545182508
>No, it wasn't.
Anthropologists believe they were at least socially monogamous.
>>
>>545182660
>anthropologists
Which one? In per capita.
>believe
I believe in Cthulhu and that my ancestor were unicorns.
>>
File: 1738096372583432.jpg (174 KB, 1290x1127)
174 KB JPG
>>545180928
No we aren't. Civilization was created by the incel betamales organizing, overthrowing the alphamales, and redistributing the females amongst themselves. Those women would rather be apart of chad's harem than be monogamous to their matched husband. If you were an 'alphamale' who could attract a bunch of women and have 30 kids with a dozen different women, you would do it, too. Our basic instincts are for polygamy which benefits our genetic progeny. Civilization, however, cannot survive this, and civilization beats pre-civilization, with advanced civilization beating basic civilization. Each is dependent on another layer of critically thought out planning, and organization and cooperation between the largest number of viable males. Our natural tendencies clash with the necessities of reality. There's a reason why there's been zero successful gynocentric civilizations; they can't compete with patriarchal ones, and they are weakened by internal strife, as the men with no reproductive access tear it apart from the inside. These are not biologically monogamous tendencies.
>>
>>545182741
https://www.jstor.org/stable/44281912

As for the belief part it's their guess based on presented evidence, your belief or feeling theirs isn't valid (because it's about a field they study) is just a syptom of being a retard.
>>
>>545182842
Monogamy is an aspect of K selected behavior, like apex predators while polygamy is more of an r selected behavior. Humans are a bit of both but the natural instinct for a genetically healthy human is monogamy in both men and women (pure virgin wife = K selected, christ like husband = K selected).
>>
>>545183035
>based on presented evidence
evidence:
"anthropologists believe"
>is just a syptom of being a retard
Yes, indeed, fuck-o.
But I get it: for you n-tier consequences are a prohibited fruit. We should have never given you access to our internet, punkass bitch.
>>
>>545183073
You will die a virgin, rK-selector.
>>
>>545183121
>evidence
No, from fossil records of family troupes, long sexual maturation and low fertility and little sexual dimorphism (though that's a feature of all primates).
>>
>>545183190
No, you are too stupid to even begin to understand what you are typing. Jfc, what fucking fuckhole did you fuckheads crawl out of, this is worse than plebbit at its worst. Motherfucker. Another board is gone.
>>
>>545180928
FPBP
Humans evolved for monogamy because it takes so much effort to raise children. If you reproduced with someone who wouldn't help you raise your child, you were fucked.
>>
>>545183073
Well also with primates we select strongly for penis size in a monogamous relationship, but that data is mostly due to us and Gorillas being outliers (we as a species are generally considered to be some variety of monogamous and have the largest penis of primates, while Gorillas have the smallest of all mammals, relatively, and are haram breeders).
>>
File: 1791409361398113.jpg (42 KB, 736x414)
42 KB JPG
>>545182842
>If you were an 'alphamale' who could attract a bunch of women and have 30 kids with a dozen different women, you would do it, too.
I have been friends with numerous "alpha males" and none of them do this. You are falling for the classic meme of identifying bad behavior that requires high status / value / wealth to get away with, not trusting your own (correct) initial negative judgment of this because you've internalized on some level that this is proceeding from you being a "coping jealous beta male", and seeking to address that by inverting it and being like "no, I'm not going to cope, I'm going to face up to it, I'd do the same thing too and I'm just jealous and who am I to criticize them". Which is admirable on some level because it reflects a kind of courage to try and face your own perceived weakness, but the higher form of courage that you should seek to cultivate is to have the self-confidence to stand by your initial judgment that it's wrong and not let the voices (internal or external) telling you that you're just being a coping pussy get under your skin
>>
>>545183243
>you are too stupid
I have no reason to care about your feelings.
>>
>>545183252
>haram
Harem.
>>
>>545180885
>white male kills entire family
Every. Damn. Time.
>>
>>545183243
midwit detected
>>
>>545182842
I don't think anyone would describe me as an alpha male and I have 3 kids with my wife, who is 15 years younger than me. I have one kid with her best friend from college, and I have at least 4 confirmed kids with Jeetas I had while working as a diving instructor there in my 20s.
>>
>>545183333
I know a few white men who haven't murdered their families.
>>
>>545183380
>Jeetas I had while working as a diving instructor
>Jeets bothering to learn to drive instead of buying a license off another Jeet.
I call your story bullshit.
>>
>>545180885
why are chinlets like this?
>>
>>545183073
>>545183252
We have tracked lineages of the X chromosome and found that we have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors (on the aggregate) with periods of time having an 11-1 ratio. This is not monogamous behaviour. These rates drop considerably with the advent of civilization.

>>545183273
>I have been friends with numerous "alpha males" and none of them do this.
Because we inhabit civilization, retard. That was the whole point of the argument. I should note, however, that this is breaking down.

>failed psychoanalysis attempt
Cool story bro.
>>
File: 1740670740946291.jpg (209 KB, 1440x1280)
209 KB JPG
>>545181976
tragic femicide case? erm, how can i make this about palestine?
>>
>>545183249
Yeah, the logic of incel evopsych bullshit doesn't make sense at all when you think about what humans actually are and examine your own natural feelings about things for more than 30 seconds.

>childhood mortality above 50%
>fertility window not much longer than time to maturity for children
>extreme parental investment
>children helpless for years and unable to defend themselves for even longer
>every single human society developed something like marriage
>men generally don't want single mothers
>women hate infidelity as much as men do
>equal sex ratio
>capable of both love and grief

We're monogamous. We can change partners if we have to and we're psychologically complex enough to disrupt it in all sorts of ways, but there's no denying the underlying fact we're made for very long term associations.
>>
>>545183534
>This is not monogamous behaviour.
It unironically is, not all men end up reproducing in history. We're generally considered socially monogamous, not true monogamous.
>>
>>545180885
Marriage is the natural order of things. The men involved in situations like this are demented losers.
>>
>>545183534
in times of crisis people become more r selected, and the 11-1 or 17-1 is to do with one family having all the kids and wiping out the others. It wasn't literally one guy with 11 women, it was one family with the same genes wiping out the rest.
>>
>>545183464
Not driving, diving instructor. And the Jeetas were staff at the resort in Goa I worked at. I think in the five years I worked there, I only ever saw a half dozen Indian families there as clients.
>>
>>545183710
>Not driving, diving instructor
Which they still wouldn't use because they know they're just bribing Prajeet to pass them.
>>
>>545183710
how did you end up fucking so many jeetas? Do white guys really get jeeta pussy that easily?
>>
>>545183534
>We have tracked lineages of the X chromosome and found that we have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors (on the aggregate) with periods of time having an 11-1 ratio. This is not monogamous behaviour. These rates drop considerably with the advent of civilization.
See: https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2018/05/war-clan-structure-explain-odd-biological-event

It's because men generally staid home and entire male lineages wiped out in wars, whereas women were sometimes married off, and they were generally enslaved rather than slaughtered in wars. When a war wiped out a village, it quite possibly wiped out all the men and an entire Y-DNA lineage, but the mtDNA line survived because the females were not butchered, and it was present in other villages as well.
>>
>>545183700
Not even just that, we do re-pair after our partner dies. And reproductive success favours men who are on a second partner over women who are.
>>
>>545183534
There was hella rape going on back in the day, with warring tribes exterminating the males and breeding the women. To make the argument that "the natural state of human sexual selection is Chad harems" or whatever seems more like, like I said, something that you're compelling yourself to believe
>>
>>545180885
No. Monogamous copers are closeted christards in denial. It's only when western retards are the ones saying that in here.
>>
>>545180928
50% divorce rate
>>
>>545180885
Nothing makes a woman's coochie wetter than marrying a serial psychotic murderer
>>
>>545183617
pipe down, shlomo no one is going to stop reminding you that youre bloodthirsty demons
>>
>>545185222
what? afaic israel and palestine should both be stomped out, and performative cucks like you should hang WITH THEM
>>
File: HCXR6iZbYAAu7Dl.jpg (46 KB, 680x404)
46 KB JPG
>>545185290
>ermmm actually both sides are le bad
if you cant get behind the side fighting kikes for their homeland either stfu or kys
>>
>>545185523
I, like most white people, am tired of hearing about sandprincesses going back and forth. literally just nuke eachother.
>>
File: 1000015057.gif (757 KB, 220x248)
757 KB GIF
>>545185523
>>545185638
and if I had to choose a side I'd pick the kikes because muslims are trash.
>>
File: 1606237057397.jpg (724 KB, 1647x1094)
724 KB JPG
>>545185680
jews
>cut off baby boys penis skin traumatizing them from infacy to be marked as slaves
>use the penis skin of babies for rituals, pharmaceuticals (from greek word for sorcery)
>give women rights and put them in charge
>give small boys to homosexual male couples

muslims
>do not mutilate baby boys penis skin
>do not give women rights
>throw faggots of rooftops
>allow honor killing of whores
>a man owns multiple wives as property
>>
>>545189004
muslims:
>inade white countries
>(absolutely do mutilate childs genitals you retard)
>are literally not white and disrupt social order
>behead you for drawing cartoons
I'm from a stock of Hungarians and there's no way in hell you'd convince me to sympathise with theOttoman invaders.

let's talk about how the crusades were a campaign of defense against the islamic invaders who took europeans as slaves and concubines.

cunt I didn't forget 9/11, nor did i forget 1354, or 1526. youre barking up the wrong tree, faggot. and if you're white (lol, doubt) then you're a traitor and will be spiked
>>
>>545189261
Americans dont hate muslims for the same reason you probably dont hate mexicans, which is that we never see or interact with them and thus have no reason to hate them.
>>
>>545189307
Well let me give you facts. Australians DO hate everything, and everyone that isn't Australian. my wife is American and it took her like 3 years to pick upon it, and yeah she's brown too - native american mixed with m
>>
>>545189534
Well you can't really hate mexicans if you married one.
>>
>>545180885
>be woman
>Don't kill your kids
>Be happy with your 3/10 husband
>get killed
You cannot with the absolute state of the white race :(
>>
>>545189663
there's a difference between mexicans and natives
>>
>>545180885
Damn I wonder what she did to make him so angry
>>
>>545189678
this brownoid is really here spraken bad german and condoning femicide.
>>
File: 1674612964503725.jpg (115 KB, 900x900)
115 KB JPG
>>545181460
FELLOW STALKER IT IS I YOUR LOCAL BANDIT VASYA! NOW DO THE NEEDFUL AND HAND OVER OUR ARTIFACTS AND MAYBE YOU WON'T TURN INTO BLOODSUCKER CHOW!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.