voting and representative democracy could work.>political parties made illegal>lobbying made illegal>political advertisements made illegal>all votes must be write-in, spelling of name counts>votes proportional to: tax paid / earned income>(capital gains jews, poorfags, retireefags, etc. get no voting rights as per this arrangement)>elected representatives paid big salaries but must wear pic related>more than 50% disapproval rating (same as vote weights) = det switch sends representative to nigger hell>any corruption is punishable by execution of their entire bloodline
>>545218699>Two jews strap a bomb to a white man for money>kill white man>the second half of the plot was to kill her goy father because he was spending money she thought she deservedNever include a picture more interesting than your post. That was fascinating.
>>545218699>people allowed to vote could work*Absolutely not*.I refuse to conceive of any system where the average human is given the right to choose anything, even what they must eat this afternoon. The average human being is a colossal fuck up, and they have been chattel from the day their father fell upon their mother in whatever drunken gutter they were sired. Now imagine this hairless ape, whose mistakes we have to pay taxes to repair and towards whom we need to contain our instinctive disapproval, is given the right not only to fuck over their own short existence on this Earth and of their proles, but also ours — and empowered by the self-righteous creed that such system is the most morally righteous and of unquestionable merit?Behold, every two/four years we hold our breath that fools won't sell us to a foreign power or company who has the best lobbyists.Perhaps Bertrand de Jouvenel and Carl Schmitt put it best, that in any democratic regime, they have observed poorer representation of the common will and their values than in the councils of kings. For kings, to separate themselves from despots, need to limit themselves by the customs and values of their people; democratic leaders and democratic institutions, by the virtue of the democratic process, believe themselves empowered to transgress against all and everything for the sake of their own sanctity.
>>545218699Notice, anon, how in your attempt to repair democracy, you make it anything but.>communal punishment and management responsibilization>extensive investigation of representatives>extensive limitation of interest groups>tiered vote according to certain criteria (for you, income)>constant feedback except the one from the ballotWhat you are describing is closer to the regime Putin runs than any democracy. It is even less democratic than the CCP.Might as well just remove the right to vote from the citizen.
>>545220676under my system leaders are subservient to those who pay taxes with earned income (their labor.) this sounds more reasonable than anything i've heard before.
>>545218699>votes proportional to: tax paid / earned income>PlutocraticShalom, the banking guild bids you welcome.
>>545222323capital gains aren't earned income and aren't taxed as earned income. rich jews who earn capital gains and pay capital gains taxes would get no say as per my formula.
>>545222485It seems so far-fetched, like you are creating tons of patches rather than just ditch the thing altogether. You even want public officials to wear handcuffs, so you clearly have a terrible opinion about them.Tell me, why even remain democratic, if you need to make sure that interest groups are curbed, that representation is conditioned, that political advertisement / parties / coalitions are made illegal (hence, your system favors tremendously whoever is already in charge, since being in the government and enacting policy is the best possible advertisement of leadership), and so on.The automatic result of your regime will be rule be unelected officials, who can act and execute public power without such constraints Then, if you are going to be ruled by unelected officials anyway, might as well make it a dictatorship or a monarchy.The more severe Achilles heel of the entire system seems to be the whole disapproval rating metric, which begs the question, who is measuring the disapproval? An unelected official? A private company? Once again, unelected officials will run this regime (which is not necessarily bad, depending on who these officials are; they could be FBI thugs worried about their pensions, as well as a nobility of warrior kings), since it is made as hard as possible for people to actually make their will and concerns known.
>>545222485More taxes=more votes, votes go towards grants and contracts...........its called "public investments" o algo.Its feeds itself, like welfare voting.
