[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I looked at the whole card house of Anthropic and OpenAI and it doesn't really look good for them. People have started to just use LLMs as tools and this summer Claude Fable was cool, but now it just become a nuissance and too expensive. Claude Opus 5.5. is wrong so often, it is not even funny.

So I just went back to doing my job myself and just get some leads from AI or let my work be checked. So my usage has dropped, so I pay 200 bucks a month, not 2000 bucks a month. And I hear it is the same for others in related professions.

ChatGPT is so bad, I only pay 20 bucks a month to sometimes double check things, but don't really use anything OpenAI creates, their data they use is just way too bad for a good tool.
>>
the solo consumer functions you're talking about is only a small part of their revenue.
the money is in their enterprise APIs.
>>
>>545305621
Why are you paying for any AI when free AI exists?
>>
>>545305762
I know, the company I work for has 10,000 employees globally. And we do have Claude, but only Opus 5.5. So I used Fable on my own account, but I am stopping because my productivity has gone down and the work product has declined.
>>
>>545305762
>Imaginary integration
Just wait until corporate endpoints are ready, kek
>>
>>545305809
Mostly time, I do not have time to set stuff up myself.
>>
>>545305952
this is anecdotal.
>>
>>545306065
Yes but anecdotal information can also correlate with causality to real trends in larger cohorts so simply pointing that out says nothing.
>>
>>545306065
Yes, it is annectodal.

What is not just an annectode is revenue growth for Anthropic and OpenAI declining sharply and their losses increasing. That is a problem, this is a Googe style “winner takes it all” race, and OpenAI is losing.
>>
>>545306255
>checked
Individual corporate winners and losers will both populate cohorts that are > 1. Meaning there’s likely not to be a single winner. Breakthroughs like AGI, ASI, etc will likely happen simultaneously in multiple companies, similar to frontier model performance
>>
>>545306172
>correlate with causality to real trends in larger cohorts
but it's doesn't correlate.

>>545306255
>revenue growth for Anthropic and OpenAI declining sharply
Yes it declined, from stratospheric to very good.
Anthropic Q3 growth was 44%, which is still very good.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.