[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: question pepe.png (90 KB, 246x221)
90 KB PNG
for example separate gun laws for Whites and niggers to prevent punishing everyone for the behavior of niggers
>>
By starting from a point where niggers are even allowed to exist in the country I can tell that you are jewish
>>
>>545352145
we have to start somewhere
>>
>>545352026
Sure, why not
>>
>>545352026
Only if it's white identity kek
>>
>>545352026
You couldn't even if you wanted. It violates the 14th ammendment and civil rights act

>but the left does it
Mostly through means outside the law. And when they do use the law its clever language that doesnt directly erode the 14th or civil rights act.

>how csn we undue the civil rights act ir 14th
Get the supreme court to beleive the act violates the constitution. That would require the niggers and women on the supreme court to strike down their greatest protection. But its easier than the alternative which is to convince them to narrow the 14th or to get the nation to due s constitution assembly where 3/4 must agree to abolish the 14th. Doing so would not only remove protection for every group including Whites.

So what you are asking isnt impossible. But it would require things that while technically possible would never occur.

Best thing would ve to not chsnge laws but work within them in clever was like the dems. Right is too low iq for this which is why they historically never have
>>
>>545352026
That was the genesis of most American antigun policy.
As should probably have been predicted it was eventually used against whites as well.
>>
>>545352635
Oh shut up you midwit
>>
>>545352907
Sorry that was rude, but this triggered me
>Right is too low iq for this which is why they historically never have
There are greater historical factors at work contributing to the outcome of progressives being able to bend the rules like this more easily than reactionaries, it's lazy smug redditism to be like "uh reTHUGlicans just didn't go to college"
>>
>>545353123
Your apology is unexpected and mature. What would be these historical factor that prevent the right from coming up with clever ways of discrimination within the law. All you need is some smart right wingers to come up with a plan and for the rest to follow. I think its either low iq or terrible socializing skills.
>>
>>545353544
-The delegitimization of white ethnocentrism as a result of WW2
-The need, during the Cold War, to distance ourselves from the perception in the third world that we were just the continuation of the erstwhile white supremacist European empires (which the Soviets were encouraging) because we didn't want them to do a global communist revolt against us
-[Neo]liberalism with regard to the labor market in particular, namely its desire to lower labor costs by putting women to work and importing tons of foreigners

All of these (among other things) push in the direction of progressive interpretations (and reform) of the law, and away from reactionary ones. You are paddling upstream trying to get the law to be pro-white or pro-man, and vice versa. If there's any truth to the idea of a "dearth of intellect on the right" it's not that "people who believe these things tend to be stupid" but rather primarily that a) they're largely shut out of the academy and other such intelligentsia-producing institutions and b) the amorally ambitious and able are always going to side by default with whatever ideology will most facilitate their climb up the ladder, which in this case is progressivism, which is going to tick the needle a little in favor of progressives in any "average IQ between these two groups" comparison
>>
>>545354179
We have had a decade or two of hyper white ethno centralism. If you are capable of coming up with clever ways of acting within the law do it already. Instead all I see is low iq retards who default to the idea of violence or a dictatorship but than give up and become sad when they realize they arent going to ever actually pull a trigger. To use your word, thugs. Liberal college kids find clever ways to discriminate with inside the law. While "my ancestral wisdom" right wingers seem to just complain that the rules dont allow them to instantly win.
>>
>>545352026
Yes. Muslim kids who shoplift should have a hand chopped off according to their tradition.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.