[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1792433960534.jpg (51 KB, 348x745)
51 KB JPG
>be China in 2008
>only 672 km of high-speed rail
>Beijing to Shanghai takes 10-15 hours
>decide to build the biggest HSR network on Earth
>invest $800 billion to $1 trillion
>by 2010: 5,000 km
>by 2015: 20,000 km
>by 2020: 38,000 km
>by end of 2025: over 50,000 km
>in ~18 years create a network longer than Earth's circumference
>Beijing-Shanghai is now 4h 20m
>2024: 3.3 billion passengers, avg 9 million trips per day, avg trip ~331 km
>frees up regular lines for freight
>connects distant cities to economic hubs
>cuts oil dependence hard
>if those trips were by car: 38 billion liters of gas a year ($38B)
>US has 735 km total
>China has ~69 times more
>owns 70.6% of the entire world's high-speed rail

Why is the US so backward compared to China?
>>
China is almost 100% homogenous
USA is 40% white
>>
Strange how the inventors and funders of the legacy tech couldn't get it together to build their society considering it was rail that made it happen.
>>
It's really stunning what you can achieve when you have a government that isn't laser focused on enriching itself at all costs
>>
nobody else in the world needs that much railway lines beside maybe India, it's why nobody would be so dumb to spend hundreds of billions on it.
>>
>>545364446
chinese are chinese. americans are americans. china has 50 ethnicities but it doesn't matter. america has 5 major groups and it is the most important thing the USA has.
>>
>>545364620
True, although like 95% of Chinese are Han. But yeah, its the system that matters, not etnicity.
>>
Americans don't want high speed rail+china uses slave labor.

>>545364446
Neither you or china are homogenous, the US is 70% white and 50% of russians are half-turkic due to soviet policies of intermarriage but your government classifies these mutts as 'white russians'.
>>
>>545364320
China has a five-year planning policy to develop the country and become an industrial power while the US tends to rely on think tanks to plan the plundering of resources abroad and maintain its hegemony over financial markets. They do not have the same ruling classes.
>>
>>545364724
Meds
>>
>>545364724
>the US is 70% white
Ahahaha
>he actually believes this
>>
>>545365183
Even by official stats US is around 50% white. And that includes Arabs and mixed people classified as white.
>>
>>545364724
America doesn't have high speed railway, or any civilian railway for that matter, because the car, petroleum and airlines lobby doesn't want it.
>>
>>545365230
Being white or yellow are bullshit concepts the Nazis considered the Japanese to be honorary whites. The system will label anything as “white” if it suits their purposes, like Arabs, because Saudi Arabia is aligned with the US
>>
>>545364320
China is kinda a shithole where they sacrifice quality of life for infrastructural gains. Every chinese vlog on youtube is them complaining about 14 hour days for $5 an hour pay while being forced to live in a 1 room apartment with another roommate.
It's like comparing North Korea's clean and maintained cities to Detroit. Life isn't black and white, it kinda needs to be good, and life in China is really, really bad.
>>
>>545364724
>the US is 70% white
>>
>>545365718
>the Nazis considered the Japanese to be honorary whites
They didn't. They never said anything of that sort.
>>
>>545364683
> But yeah, its the system that matters, not etnicity.
Kek
>>
>foreigners bashing America out of jealousy

The real reason is because such a network would not mesh with the way our infrastructure is built. We rely heavily on cars as our cities are more spread out. The Chinese bought into the 15 minute city meme that you all go full schizo about. If an American took a train from San Diego to Dallas, he would still need to get a car to travel locally. We also have a very robust and affordable domestic airline network that gets us around the country.

Tl;dr Chinese society is built different, which is why their transportation is different
>>
>>545364320
Why build rail when you can give all your money to Israel?
>>
>>545365773
Look up "Ehrenarier"
Thank me later
>>
>>545364724
>the US is 70% white
yeah in 1950
>>
>>545365843
>We don't need no high speed rail we have European cars and Chinese cars
Masterful strategy
>>
>>545365812
Its true. Singapore is a melting pot of Chinese, Malay, Indians, Filipinos etc. and it works just fine.
>>
File: IMG_1439.jpg (613 KB, 1272x647)
613 KB JPG
>>545364320
>Be America in 1850’s
have hundreds of miles of railroad track
>Be china in 1950’s
eat your relatives again
>>
>>545365867
Hm, for some reason I always thought it was a myth...
>>
>>545365908
Ok so no niggers and jeets
>>
>>545365908
>and it works just fine
>>
>>545366038
There are no niggers in Singapore, but tons of jeets. Well, no tons, but like 15% of the country, so Canada levels of jeet.
>>
>>545364320
The United States gives money to airlines and then the airlines use that money to lobby politicians to stop High-Speed rail.
I wish I were joking
>>
>>545366069
You mean Singapore is disfuntional?
>>
>>545364683
Ethnicity matters a lot, negroland has more of everything than any other continent and is still the poorest.
>muh colonalizm
Without colonialism it would be even worse
>>
File: leds.jpg (1.24 MB, 1498x1363)
1.24 MB JPG
>>545364724
>he US is 70% white
lol lmao
>>
>>545365843
This is the heart of it. For local travel domestic flight is far more cost effective and demands far less infrastructure.
Rail is useful for heavy cargo but far less useful for passengers. It only really makes sense if you're travelling a distance too short for flight to be worthwhile, which is where rail overlaps with cars.

The real reason China went so hard on passenger rail is twofold: they don't have the technology or industrial reliability for safe and efficient air travel, and they don't want to give their citizens the freedom to drive anywhere in a well-connected road network. Rail was the best solution that they could build themselves.

The developed world largely abandoned passenger rail infrastructure because air travel makes it obsolete. Nobody is impressed that China laid a bunch of track.
>>
>>545365908
Singapore is 3/4 chinese
>>
>lazy wumaothropod comparison shit in the catalog
What stocks dumped in China this time?
>>
>>545364320
>look mom i posted it again!
go eat some bugs, chang
>>
>>545364320
>>545365056
yeah miggers are still sliding the amerimutt ai stock bubble collapse with these MUTTIDF spam threads
>>
>>545366377
Nobody is impressed except for those who desperately want to marvel at anything that they feel makes America look bad.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.