>>545395446>October 14 wasn’t the first time Carolyn Marvin put herself in front of an autonomous delivery robot. It had become, since the wheeled little food vessels were unleashed upon certain parts of Philadelphia, a habit for the 78-year-old: standing in front of one of the robots when she encountered it rolling on the sidewalk, delaying it for a few minutes from delivering its precious lunchtime cargo.
here is a picture of the luddite bitch
Crossing the street you get the right of way. you stand in the path, society should beat the stupid out of you with a bamboo cane
>>545395446Cops never arrest leftists who block cameras of conservative activists.
>>545395446SI
>>545395446Okay? What rights does she think the robot has? And why does she not care about the rights of the robots owners?
what about the rights of the customers to receive hot food?
She's a lunch time rowdy
It's not a discussion of rights, it's hijacking private property.
>>545395446It depends on if the robots are hindu
>>545395446No.NULLIFY ANY JURY YOU CAN.
>>545395446Only if it lets me fuck it
>>545395996>What rights does she think the robot has? AndDoesn't matter, she clearly has more. Which is to say, if it has zero, and she only has one...
>>545396336She didn't take the food, she merely delayed its delivery. I'm still waiting to see what the actual charge is.
>>545396619they could easily trump up some shit like being a public nuisance, or disturbing the peace
>>545396559>foids have a right to do shit to fuck up society. kys
>Job Displacement: Marvin stated she targets the bots to protest low-wage human delivery workers losing their jobs to corporate automationpoor wagies
>>545395446A 78 year old lady whacking the robot with her cane like it was the nigger help would be hilarious
>>545395446Yes.
>>545395446The robot doesn't have rights, the owner of it does, and the person who requested their service does. In principle, this isn't different than standing in front of a food delivery vehicle to delay it on purpose, for which, if police were called about it, she would be arrested too.
>>545397090>boomer woman demands people work for a non living wage instead of automating it and deporting the shit skins brought over for those jobsPottery
>She's a retired """communications""" professorso all of those low wage food delivery gig drivers are her students
>>545397227This is the non-retard take. If someone delayed me finishing a delivery when I was a pizza guy, they're ruining the quality of the food, and preventing both myself (irrelevant in this case--automatons don't get paid) and the restaurant from making more money.
>>545396619obstruction
