[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HV-_eitaAAAoUHE.jpg (440 KB, 2048x1053)
440 KB JPG
Research shows the peak age for women having healthy children is 16-20
Girls should get married at 14, have their first child at 16, and then remain a homemaker
((((Modernity)))) corrupted this by wasting peak female fertility years on partying and degeneracy
>>
>>545428770
It's something known for a long time.
Even before this study, we knew that the older the woman, the higher the chance she give birth to an autist.
And it only makes sense, unlike sperm which is continuously produced, women are born with their full set of eggs and are not produced anymore, meaning that the eggs of a roastie are the same she had when she was young.
Biologically, there's no cell that can survive that long without damage, which is why women should procreate young.
>>
>>545428770
Pedophile
>>
>>545428770

Where the fuck did they get all the data for 12/13/14 year olds from? That an Epstein file contribution or something?
>>
>>545428770
Look the incel pedo found a 40-year old study saying his lust for barely pubescent girls is entirely healthy not weird and criminal at all
>>
>>545428770
Yes, I know
>>
>>545428770

Women based on all long living intelligent species should be spending 8 years minimum directly with each child giving sole undivided attention to the childs needs.

That means if you want 3 children then you need to start at about 18, second at 26 and third at 34 which mens they are done with direct maternal duties by 40.

We either accept the framework of longevity and apex intellect given by nature. Or just do generational sloshing in a familial and national level.

We also need to change work that young people pro use labour and then at about 60 you become the sit at a desk cunt till 75. Then retire for 15 years or so.

The model of shitting out as many as you will have as quick as possible then institutionalising them at 4 years old is utterly broken and bottom feeder like.
>>
File: 1772307031147004.gif (592 KB, 220x391)
592 KB GIF
>science says the optimal age to impregnate a girl is 13
>>
>>545430723
>8 years minimum
maybe if you're bad at reproducing
people who are good at fucking have as many as possible as fast as possible
>>
>>545428770
>Girls should get married at 14,
Why?

Women should have children when they are sixteen but those children should be raised outside the home by older women. That way we can maximize the health of children but also keep them as a viable working class.
>>
>>545430420
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14747049211039506

> We used 1990 U.S. data from birth certificates and from fetal and infant death certificates, including 1.691 million primiparas, 17,508 women with fetal deaths and no previous births (nulliparas), and 2.510 million women with one or more previ-ous births (multiparas). The 1990 birth cohort linked birth-infant death data and fetal death data are available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/vitalstatsonline.htm

> Using this 1990 sample, rather than more recent U.S. data, has four advantages: (a) the 1989 revision of birth certificate launched a relatively brief period when the diagnosis of CPD was recorded; (b) the overall frequency of C-sections was considerably lower than it is currently and thus more indicative of the true risk of adverse outcomes (see below); (c) there were more mothers in the younger age groups, thus increasing the power of age comparisons; and (d) the U.S. female population had lower levels of obesity, a condition which could be confounded with age.
>>
File: Fecundability.jpg (103 KB, 1119x848)
103 KB JPG
>>545430924
Anon, she has to find a husband first. You don't find a life partner in a single month.
>>
>>545431001
The very concept of a husband is outdated nonsense with no bearing in reality. To optimize society the concept of family should be abolished.
>>
File: joe biden.jpg (198 KB, 1674x951)
198 KB JPG
>>545428770
This is false. You WILL be Ridin' with Biden.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0CFOvZ2ZwA
>>
File: empoweringchart.jpg (857 KB, 1152x1367)
857 KB JPG
>>545431086
>>
File: senescence.jpg (110 KB, 913x1200)
110 KB JPG
>>545431102
>>
>>545430723
>wants more Lindsay Clancies in the world

This is false. Frankenstein experiments ONLY.
>>
>>545431180
>>
Muh age of consent
Muh feminists
Muh birth control hormone maxing
>>
>>545430519
All male sexuality is criminal and paedophillic. More importantly, it leads to another holocaust.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0C7pyNzpg8&t=1s
>>
File: japanese-feminism.png (2.66 MB, 508x1372)
2.66 MB PNG
>>545431240
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0C7pyNzpg8&t=1s
>>
File: jaffe.jpg (219 KB, 1024x758)
219 KB JPG
>>545431266
>>
I got bad news for people:
Pre-history, nearly all people had kids in their teens, girls by age 13-14 and boys by 16, going by the skeletons. Also, most pregnancies were probably rape. Hence why males can ejaculate quickly (get in, do the deed, get out before tribe kills you) and why female orgasms strongly correlate to conception (80%-85% of rape victims reportedly orgasm, which is fucked up). Add to that the homonal tide in one's teens compelling you to breed, and why age discrepency is such a thing to where older humans are always viewed as 'ugly'. It's because they're less sexually valuable and you instinctively know it. Instinct isn't a conscious choice.

Human biology and sexual function is probably the greatest evidence there is no god. There's basically nothing noble about us.
>>
>>545431102
This is not causal. Also, college-educated women are the most likely to give birth to White babies.

"Female education does appear to be a likely cause of fertility decline, but the effect is restricted to 0-10 years of education, not the usual infinite university degrees usually discussed."

https://www.emilkirkegaard.com/p/female-education-and-fertility-rates?utm_source=publication-search
>>
File: 0-growth.jpg (894 KB, 1498x2554)
894 KB JPG
>>545431287
>>
>>545431266
Isn't it weird how a jewish lady with zero experience or skills somehow got in charge of rewriting an entire nation's legal code?

Isn't it also weird that all the Nuremburg victims were subjected to torture by a 100% jewish unit under the British government?
>>
>>545431392
>Muh thought-terminating cliche
Go on, post some ius naturale gibberish like the Americancer anon. I'll add it to the list. You are visibly dysgenic and statistically as liberal as a German woman. Silence emasculated male.
>>
File: _1673049082899880.jpg (386 KB, 1536x2048)
386 KB JPG
>>545431001
my mom had me at 45
>>
>>545431442
>>
File: whitepill cross1.jpg (1.45 MB, 2174x1146)
1.45 MB JPG
>>545431479
>>545431102
>>545431392


By the way, that women's rights activist group removed that quote from their page after it went viral.

Here is a screencap though. If you go to their live site, it went missing about a year and half ago. https://www.wgow.org/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/wymyn1.jpg

>NOOOO ITS NOT CAUSAL

lmfao. obvious subversive.
>>
>>545431442
The reason women are on so many depression meds and mood stabilizers is because they're supposed to be moms by age 25 raising kids in a tribal unit. Not working on their (((career))) and sleeping around with randos while on birth control.

I find it very fascinating how feminism is effectively jews telling White women that breeding is morally bad and marriage is awful, and that they should live a childless life in solitude. Meanwhile, orthodox jews have arranged marriages and get married in their teens.

It's almost like you should never, ever, listen to jews.
>>
>>545431550
It happened with Christianity as well. Castration death cult aside, Jews were converting wives, encouraging them not to sleep with their husbands because Yeshua was sure to return soon. The same tactic we see in modern leftist 'dont breed for climate change' cults. It also inverted the traditional patriarchal language to be something abstract and centred on Jesus (hate the father, call no man father, sacrilege to turbo patriarchal Graeco-Romans).

Collection of accounts of Christkikes corrupting Roman and Greek women, and their patrician/king husbands killing the subversive depopulationist demons we are taught to revere as saints and 'martyrs'. Martyred for brainwashing Roman women into not fucking their husbands because rabbi yeshua was coming soon. No different to the modern climate change 'don't have children for the environment' cults. Become 'voluntary eunuchs for the kingdom of god' through (((equal mutual consent))). Sound familiar?

Jews have been targeting our women for MILLENNIA and using them to depopulate and undermine us.

The entire Christian sexual abstinence formula is a non-surgical method of 'spiritual castration'.... KEK to impose the bridal virginal ethic of Pudicitia on houselords and become like spiritual women for Rabbi Yeshua. I have seen grown men in their 50s and 60s on Christian podcastss literally talking about their 'consummation' night on the 'coming' of their 'lord'. Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
>>
>>545431666
>'voluntary eunuchs for the kingdom of god' through (((equal mutual consent))). Sound familiar?

Ooh, I got Nérōn Kaîsar anti-Christ beast digits! Based.
>>
>>545428770
Who cares? Definitely not women.
Let natural selection do its job
>>
>>545431086
>no serious guys til you are on the doorstep of geriatric pregnancies
>>
>>545430830
>science
You mean nature, basedence would love to deny it, but it can't
>>
File: naughty no no.webm (1.53 MB, 720x1280)
1.53 MB
1.53 MB WEBM
>>545431704
Moral authority via sex-shaming men is used as an entryway to enshrine female morality and then total authority. It is a total attack on your consciousness, existence, and posterity. You turn the other cheek, but each dismissal is an act of assent. We are the product of continual dismissal and laziness from our forefathers who thought they would always live in comfort, rather than caring about the posterity of their descendants.

A civilisation that doesn't resist matriarchal Jewish feminism has already failed.
>>
File: jewish feminsim.png (429 KB, 753x641)
429 KB PNG
>>545433112
>A civilisation that doesn't resist matriarchal Jewish feminism has already failed.
>>
>>545431311
It wouldn’t have been rape.
>get in and get out before the tribe kills you
The tribe would kill the child lol.
Rapists reproduce less in tribal society because every woman is always at all times everywhere ten feet away from a seasoned warrior male relative.
Only in actual warfare with war brides would rape even be possible.
>>
>>545433112

In my experience it's the how.

Saying I'm not gonna respond even though you hurt me is completely different from I'm not gonna respond because it doesn't.

Have you ever witnessed a woman's reaction when you tell them that a woman cannot rape a man. That even waking up to a hambeast, if not in a relationship, clean and anonymous. Is like finding £100 on the ground on a night out. All notches count. Welcome to test the theory.

You should note the change in their demeanour.

What you suggest is glove up and get in the ring. Ignoring the implication that by doing so you accept them as competition.

Never ever play games with girls, never ever work with girls, never treat them like a man, never do anything whatsoever that would give her the idea that you are her equal. They will fucking hate you, they will try to destroy you. But who gives a fuck, all they can do is call a group of violent men and suck their dicks to deal with you.

A man's power is his ability to walk away. Not staying and fight. If you want to know how to show a woman who's boss. At 2am get up and leave, don't say anything, just leave 'I'm going for a walk', if anything. Watch what happens and who suddenly wants to meet in the middle and do as they are requested.

If you've never done that then you have played in the women's court from the women's tees your whole life, no wonder then do you feel any sort of shame.

Stay and fight, good luck with that.
>>
>>545435414
>live demonstration of what I am talking about
Thank you.

Spoken like a true passive faggot who has never built anything or asserted himself in life. Which does not imply equality or participation with the subject at all. Your attitude of social authority instead of deeds and words itself is feminist, and entirely in the language of (((female status signalling))) rather than acts.

This is exactly the emasculated self-effacing attitude that got us where we are right now. You have made your passivity into an entirely headcanon cult of irresponsibility because you have never had to struggle and create civilisation. Or you would know the historical examples in question. You are not used to creating, only used to receiving. These are the weak men that created hard times, and now we are in the middle period where the weak men still abound, but hard men are emerging gradually.

Note that the suffragettes were never so passive, and actively fought for everything they had.

Continue to advise prudence in every war cabinet and renounce your beliefs when they become (((unfashionable))). You cannot hope to understand what it means to have principles, you are a pleb. Why don't you try telling your women something before you cut down a man? A woman would never bicker and undermine another woman. They actually support one another in a single unit. But then again, material of treason, you cannot hope to understand this civilisation, no less build it.
>>
>>545436116
>>545435414

>Your attitude of social authority instead of deeds and words itself is feminist, and entirely in the language of (((female status signalling))) rather than acts.
>>
>>545436116
>Note that the suffragettes were never so passive, and actively fought for everything they had.

They organise and get what they wanted implemented.

You behave like a status signalling woman and attempt to ghost, when she doesnt notice and she has 200 other men ready to fill the spot. Communicating like a woman.

>DEEDS, NOT WORDS

Suffragettes employing Freemasonic agitation and terroristic tactics.

Her husband Richard Marsden Pankhurst was a mason and passed the Married Women’s Property Bill, which proposed treating a married woman in property and contract as if she were a feme sole; critics in parliament said it would effect a 'revolution' in the relations between the sexes and that was its intent.

Feminism is terrorism.
>>
>>545436201
>Feminism is (((terrorism))).
>(((Freemasonic agitation and terroristic tactics.)))

>committed more bombings and arsons than Al Qaeda. 337 bombing and arson attacks in 1 year, only halted when WW1 began and the white feather campaign took off. and that's without including acid attacks and vandalism of shops, voting stations, and buildings, which may take it to 500.

>Al Qaeda committed 4 at their peak in Britain, in 2017. And 30 in a peaceful Islamic country outside of a war zone, Saudi Arabia.

Afraid to assert yourself.
>>
>>545436201
>Suffragettes employing Freemasonic agitation and terroristic tactics.
>>
>>545431442
>posts dysgenics in the UKBB
Okay? Do you really, earnestly believe that's related to the claim of a causal negative effect of education on female fertility? Seriously? You're clearly not capable of responding to a refutation without seething.
>>
>>545436116

> but hard men are emerging gradually.

I'll address the rest in a second. But you are stating with a straight face that fighting women makes your a hard man? Get you hard maybe, become hardened by engaging in their neuroses? Expand on that.....
>>
>>545436116
>A woman would never bicker and undermine another woman.
They literally do all the time.
>>
File: radical.png (522 KB, 782x1412)
522 KB PNG
>>545436766
>They openly state it as a causative effect
>Dating proving causative effect
Not getting dragged down in your misdirection and deception. You can fuck right off. Mad retard.
>>545436832
>Noooo the girls will look at me badly! social signal!

Only leader-natures revolt. Plebs endure any humiliation and lack virtues. Creation is an act of will, and standing on your principles. Try telling something to a woman. You won't because you are afraid she will reject you and you lack the social standing. You are scared of girls laughing at you. Don't waste me time. I'm not interested in your reactive rebuttal when you have understood nothing and break down any higher point with endless bickering and nagging like a woman with a woman mentality. Ironically, you are the one who should be ghosted and not encouraged.

Your strictly social point of view also displays a lack of historical knowledge or rooting in any higher principles that could bring you out of that condition. You have not suffered from impoverishment.
>>
>>545436116

> Spoken like a true passive faggot who has never built anything or asserted himself in life

Associative feminine bullshit. I advocate walking away/turning back. You want to double down on boomers, the most soft handed generation ever to have lived. That's sort of absolute you are ugly so I am pretty shit comes straight from your mother's mouth.

> Your attitude of social authority instead of deeds and words itself is feminist, and entirely in the language of (((female status signalling))) rather than acts.

Fucking ironic, no? Mr grandstanding about the great crusade against the womenfolk. You will go sit with them and talk with them like a little soft handed bitch.

> You have made your passivity into an entirely headcanon cult of irresponsibility

Battling to save a sinking ship out of some sort of faux male pride is just incompetence.

> You are not used to creating, only used to receiving.

I'm 'unemployed' as far as system is concerned and on zero benefits. I'm a man dumb fuck, I support myself while the very feminine system you curse gives you your daily bread. Pay taxes to pedofiles, Jews and women the moral grandstand all you want.

> Note that the suffragettes were never so passive, and actively fought for everything they had.
> Copy women
> ......
> To be masculine

> Continue to advise prudence

Waking away is the most vile t act you can take against a woman. You can call it passive, doing something about it. You can call not fighting women effeminate all you want. On a desert island, you walk away, 99% of women die within a week, they are very aware of this but if you have your mother's mind, you will ignore that blatant fact.

> Why don't you try telling your women something before you cut down a man? A woman would never bicker and undermine another woman.

Ok, go hang out with the wymen if it's so great.
>>
>>545437485
>>Dating proving causative effect
*data
>>545437500
>he actually wrote a line-by-line rebuttal of cope, proving my analysis.
>Incoherent gibberish and nagging.

Learn to recognise when a conversation has ended and you have been refuted, instead of begging for attention and approval so you can evade your feelings of inadequacy, which threaten to surface at any moment. Which seems to concern you greatly when it comes to women. I have asserted myself against women many times, whether or not it fails. That's what it means to have an essence and inner existence. You cannot bear the silence.
>>
File: 1792933051843180.png (666 KB, 1010x756)
666 KB PNG
>>545428770
>research tells us
Please, jewish golem, tell us more.
>>
>>545428770
16 year old girls should not be home-makers. Having children maybe but the extended family should already have a "home" that is "made" and ready for their children to give them grandchildren. But boomers obsessed over sports cars, second homes, jet skis, country clubs and other such faggotry to stroke their ego and compensate for their inherent feelings of inadequacy so the next gen has to make their own homes now. Even the bible says that a good man leaves an inheritance to his children's children.
>>
>>545436140

Women can't walk away. They have zero means to walk away, it isn't within their nature. They walk towards the fire, only a man can walk away because guess what, 1) he doesn't need one 2) he can build one at any time.

You go on about masculine archetypes. Yet you are determined to gaze at medusa in her eyes, determined to answer the sirens call, determined to chat with Tiamat, determined to have a standing battle with Sehkmet, determine to fight Grendel's mother on land and with many made weapons.

> A young man named Epigenes tries to bypass the sexual decree so he can be with his young, beautiful girlfriend. He "fights" back using legal arguments, trying to logic his way out of the grip of the old women dragging him away. But his resistance is totally futile—the hags use the literal text of the new law to physically overpower him and drag him off

Where's you archetypal knowledge then?

> Face the women head on in the manner they won
>>
File: conservatorship.jpg (66 KB, 558x561)
66 KB JPG
>>545437967
>MGTOW! That's what we need.

No. I advocate Women Going Our Way, passive cuck. You can go your own way right off a cliff.

>the rest is gibberish spam that only drives my point further home that this man lacks any principles and cannot assert his will.
>>
>>545438163
MGTOW utterly failed BTW.

And that's the only reason I replied to this spam.>>>>>545431545
>>
>>545437500
>>545437679
The two of you are weak and pathetic spastics.
If you were standing in front of me spouting your incessant , never ending, argumentative bullshit, I would'nt argue with you. I would just punch your fucking teeth out.
No talking, just jab, jab, hook while stepping forward to smash the top of my skull into your suspiciously jewish beaks.
Then I would smile.
Begone faggots and pray you never encounter me in real life.
>>
>>545438399
>I-I-I think that no one is right or wrong, we are all EQUALLLSS I would bash and thrash and smash
Begone child. One (1) man is talking. To himself apparently.
>fag 1 needs constant approval and reassurance from mummy, cannot tell women she did bad bad or mummy leave me!
>fag 2 needs approval and reassurance

This is what having a will and principles looks like. Not arguing about random Jungian gibberish, or degrading into barbarian thug monke. None of you have civilisational building traits. Ergo, you are not MAN.
>>
>>545437679

So you are gonna address women directly but you've passively slinked out of addressing anything put to you?

> I have asserted myself against women many times, whether or not it fails

Well you gonna actually put your dick on the table and tell the class or just play the I've to go by your emotional state?

> Silent treatment.

Hahahaha, ok hard man

If you want to say you are done then go for it. Fuck knows how that's gonna work.

I'll give you one to call ugly to make yourself pretty. Personal family matter, person wanted to break up with partner to join new collective. Child involved. I told the person that I found their behaviour to be disgusting and that if they thought I would ever come to their birthday ever again after treating people like that then they are dumb. That if they thought they can jump ship then I would simply turn my back on them. That if they have the right to treat people like that then they had no right to be treated any better. All the stuff I've fixed for them they can't do, never again, all the times I've came to their rescue, never again. I got up and left abruptly and calmly. Guess who called me to say they had a change of heart and were gonna speak to the person?.....

Males power is presence, women live and die by association with men. Deny them the association is the most violent act you can commit. Hit them? Every wife beater has a wife that gives him a reason to beat them. Reason with them? That makes you a retard.

So go on big man, articulate yourself, how do you assert yourself against the magnetic feminine force?.......
>>
>>545438664
Did you do that before or after you ranted about 2000 words of irrelevant Jungian gibberish? Maybe they just wanted you to go away mate, like you promised you would 10 posts ago.
>>
>>545438897

Kek, and with the dramatics....
>>
>>545437485
>believing what women say at face value
Kek. How feeble-minded. You're actually incapable of thinking for yourself or even just reading an article.

Read, nigger.

"We see the same clear evidence of nonlinearity, or diminishing losses from the cross-country results. It seems keeping girls and teenagers in school lowers fertility, but keeping 20 year olds in school somehow doesn't."

"Amusingly, the curve flattens out and even turns slightly upwards around 10 years of female education. Thus, the common view of college education being the big problem since it delays family formation is contracted by the results. This may be due to between country variation, or it may be real. So let's move on to a multi-level model with random intercepts and slopes. What this means is fundamentally just that we fit the regression model inside each country, and then we average the values in a clever way noting also how much variation there is in the intercepts (baseline fertility rate) and the relationship (slope):"
>>
>>545439326
>doesn't understand that 10 posts means all posts, not exclusively his

missing chromosome peasant caste. not surprised talking to this guy is like entering the twilight zone. Why are you so upset that I said you should assert yourself and not be a passive social signalling womanly faggot? Oh whatever, it's like speaking chinese to a typewriting monkey.
>>
>>545438399

> No talking
> I would just punch your fucking teeth out
> I would
> I would

Yeh, sounds like it.
>>
File: npc.png (569 KB, 700x1347)
569 KB PNG
>>545439423
>10 years of female education, when they are already past their prime

>READ THE MAINSTREAM ARTICLE and their cope for why you must NEVER EVER interpret this in the wrongthink way
>a study with the logical inference pasted over it in big bold text is not thinking for yourself

Holy shit. Is this real or are you trying to shill? Are you genuinely stupid or are you here to stir bad faith NPC opinions? You should have stopped tagging me ten posts ago, mr shill.
>>
File: Casuistry.png (2 MB, 824x634)
2 MB PNG
>>545439659
>>545439423
>Read the cope article designed to prevent wrongthink but never the women's rights activist group's own statements!

Hey Mr conformist (((Shill))) peddling subversion and amelioration. Do you know where you are fucking posting?
>>
File: saul-alinsky-remastered.jpg (370 KB, 768x1024)
370 KB JPG
>>545439423
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO you HAVE to let women work and be educated!

>...because I said so!
Look at this cuck faggot (((countersignalling))) and opinion manufacturing.
>>
>>545439507

Wait....

I get it, your primary identity is collective. That is why you assume that I mean walk away from women collectively.

Unfortunately unlike women, I can't do the hypothetical posturing walk away from women I've never met. Treat them on a case by case basis.

You identified women as a herd, your strategy in terms of hers hunting is just made up bullshit. In herd hunting you isolate individuals from the herd and they are easy pickings.

You should have just said 'my primary perspective is collective, the feminine identity, that is what I speak from'

No I don't know what you are thinking. Your grammar identified me as the subject and then assigned the numerical value ten to the number of posts. Be more clear in your grammar.

> like you promised you would 10 posts ago
> We've posted more than 10 times and you promised you would walk away from women at the start

Well deny presence

I don't know if you've ever dealt with female animals? What you are saying is utter bullshit in that respect. You get them to follow by walking away and you get them to submit by maintaining a calm unaltered silent presence within there personal space. As in just stare at them blankly and they fold in seconds.

Again you haven't articulated yourself at all in any way beyond 'we should confront them together'. Not how or why beyond 'because you are ugly so I am pretty'

I'll give you the last word
>>
>>545437766
Khazar milkers on the list. Why?
>>
File: 1793232723645941.jpg (224 KB, 1008x1024)
224 KB JPG
THIS
THREAD
IS REPORTED FOR ANTI-SEMITISM ;3
>>
Wait, according to this research, as a 29 years old guy I should be looking to meet a 16 years old girl, so I can teach her how to orgasm and impregnate her by the time she’s 17 to start a family?

That would be the optimal timeline according to science?

If so, why are women my age ridiculing guys who date any girl below the age of 25?
>>
>>545439659
>>545439751
>>545440035
>triple reply
Holy seethe. Kek. Just admit you got BTFO.

You clearly have no reading comprehension. I asked you to read the text that I had quoted, not your "mainstream article." How can someone even be as stupid as you? Kek.

97% of births to married college white mothers are by white fathers, whereas 10% of unmarried White mothers' births are from Black males. Also, married noncollege White mothers produce only 1/6 of the total births despite having similar population sizes with their college counterparts (married noncollege White mothers have lower fertility).

Why exactly don't you want White women to be in the married college group?

https://www.bronzeagepervert.yoga/p/sexual-race-war
>>
>>545441156
You want jewish milkers, you might aa well snip your dick and your sons and sell your daughter to jewish porn directors for niggers to fuck, that's the kind of animal slave you are.
Now take your boosters.
If it's more than a mouth full it's a waste.
>>
Mental, shameless attention-farming retards in this thread who don't know when to stop replying. This is what we have to deal with. Not surprised at the state we are in.
>>
>>545428770
Yes, all of humanity has known this since time immemorial.
All this recent pressure to treat women as "children" until they turn 18 (or 21 sometimes) is pure feminism.
The fact to consider is simple:
>Women who marry young are more faithful to their husbands, have more children, are more conservative, are less inclined toward feminism, etc.
They are literally better wives and better women by EVERY possible measure, which deeply irritates feminists, since women who marry young become "enemies".
One would expect nothing less from an ideology that took on its modern form through the influence of Jewish communist women.
>>
>>545443045
>why don't you want your women to get educated goy???!!!
>genuinely arguing for female education and to ignore evidence before our eyes
>most white britons who reproduce are uneducated low SES.

Sometimes I wonder if they live in this country or are just VPN shills relying on shame, misdirection, and rhetorical tactics. Don't engage with the (((shills))).
>>
File: birth.png (3.23 MB, 705x1200)
3.23 MB PNG
>>545443225
Notice how the shills conveniently ignorer the female activist's own stated birth rate reduction goals and just move forwards pressing on their point as if nothing happened. They really expect you to be this dumb. They are full of glee when you reply to them and feed their attention-whoring antics. It must be a truly low person who attempts to shill and (((manipulate))).
>>
>>545443527
>>
File: shill tactics.png (104 KB, 617x1031)
104 KB PNG
>>545443604
Shills are active at all times on boards trying to stifle discussion and truth. Be very careful about to whom you reply to on these subjects and how they try to poison the well, while massively failing.
>>
>>545443045

What's shameless for me is that at the end of my last response to you I dangled out some classic feminine controlling behaviour. Using a touch of polarisation and inversion. Which you responded to and were moved by.

Yet want to sit here and give it the big man.

I'll promise I'll give you the last word kek

But I guess you know when to stop replying, exactly when you are told to keep replying.....
>>
File: !!DO NOT LOOK!!.jpg (241 KB, 1340x1785)
241 KB JPG
>>545428770
Dropping the AOC will only lead to higher birth rates...
Men of all ages will be fucking like rabbits..

They need the lower birthrate to justify open borders immigration.
The White replacement project will not work according to plan if hot little pussy was legal.

NEVER GONNA HAPPEN.
>>
File: first intercourse cite.png (17 KB, 1220x600)
17 KB PNG
>>545428770
>>545430210
>>545431001
Age gaps in marriages are very important. When you have a good 10+ years on her, it's much easier to pull rank and guide her like daddy than it is with a peer. It's anecdotal, but the age gap couples I know are based, and the no-gap friends and family members are mega pussy whipped.

The healthiest relationships I know are those with the biggest power imbalance. Women are just too spiteful and hateful to submit to someone they could perceive as roughly their equal. With someone like that, they'll always turn it into a power struggle and constantly try to sabotage them.

The only chance you have at most of them behaving reasonably is if the guy is so objectively their superior that even they need to acknowledge it.

Although I still saw a couple relationships like that completely imploding, simply because the guy had been so mindfucked by modern society that despite being her objective superior in all regards, his sense of self-worth had been crippled so heavily that he treated her as the superior.

Women prefer it that way, too.

What woman wants a guy who is dumber than her? Weaker? Poorer? Shorter? Less popular? Less capable? And so on. Women seek out men who are superior to them, even if they don't want to admit to it. If you honestly consider yourself to be your woman's equal, it will disgust her on a subconscious level.

That's why child marriage is the only future for the West.
>>
>>545428770
>((((Modernity))))
Russian Tsars set the age of marriage at 16 in 1830.
The Bolsheviks repealed that age and went back to the puberty limit
High age of consent is a Christian position. Low age of consent and cunnyniggerism is an atheist position.
/thread
>>
>>545444954
The Judaeo-Feminists will never allow that to happen. There are hordes of hags opposed to you.

I've filtered out the shills and attention-begging retards btw. I cannot see their posts.
>>
>>545445013
Why would anyone want a submissive woman when talking to one of these is like talking to chatgpt
>>545445136
>The Judaeo-Feminists
Like the romanov family and Orthodox Church? Degenerate
>>
>>545445013
That's why it's so stigmatised, so you never have control and must be (((equals))) (read: she is superior) so she can divorce rape you at whim.
>>
>>545430723
this is retarded, older children help raise the kids too.
>>
>>545445210
Chriggers have already been proven to be subversive depopulationists, please read the thread before posting>>> >>545431666
>>545431704


this will be your only reply from me, do not use it to attention-beg or spam, I will not reply further no matter what clown antics you pull.

>>>I-I-I-I-I DON'T DESERVE TO D-D-DIE LIKE KOMRADE YESHUA... CRUCIFY ME UPSIDE DOWN FOR SUBVERTING THOSE ROMAN WIVES INTO NOT FUCKING THEIR HUSBANDS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE. I MEAN... THE KOMRADE...
>>
>>545445381
I have already defeated this spiritual semite clown in one of the pagan threads anyway, and he replied with similar cope. He knows he voluntarily lies. odd for a religion of le 'truths'.
>>
>>545445381
Is that why jews hate Christianity more than Hitler?
>>
File: INDEED.jpg (19 KB, 371x344)
19 KB JPG
>>545445136
Yep, dem wrinkled roasties be nasty bitches.
>>
>>545443786
This is by far one of the issues that bothers shills the most.
The truth is that feminism is a terrible deal for women. But this truth must not be revealed to women under any circumstances. They let their emotions guide their decisions, and once they realize that feminism turns them into useless, materialistic slaves, while their psychological well-being and humanity are completely devastated, selling this subversive Communist-Jewish garbage will become quite difficult.
>>
>>545445452
You are literally an anti christ pedophile
You exploit innocent children for your satanic sexual rituals
The world would be a better place if you get cancer, God willing
>>
>attentionbegging clown attentionbegs

>>545445620
>Yep, dem wrinkled roasties be nasty bitches.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGJTaP6anOU
>>
>>545445649
The same communists that lowered the age of consent that the Tsars set? Fuck off pedo
>>
>>545445381
this is an edomite. All those who hate Christ will perish, thank God.
>>
>>545445580
christcuckoldry is a jew worship cult and hitler was a jew
>>
>>545445806
>everyone is a jew
Well what is the point then
>>
>>545445649
Yes, friend. Agreed 100%.

This is also a repeating trope. The women are (((subverted))), civilisation collapses, then we learn the hard way after shaking off the retards who die to their own silliness. It is sad really, I am not happy about it. As bad as it gets, there is always a recovery after much chaos and death.

Really, I call it the political exploitation of women. And there is no shortage of examples in history. Most of the activists have extremely short vision and understanding of history, and low principles. That's why they are recruited to eat the rest of us up.

Lol. Try to do your best so we don't have to face that.
>>
>>545445894
During the overturning of the lex oppia, in which the tribune of the plebs Lucius Valerius delivers speeches with the patricians, like a modern politician, he cynically uses women for his own political agency and wealth while claiming to promote equality and to tame the patricians who behave as lords and masters to w-men. He teases Cato with 'do you really think the women will storm the Aventine as the plebs once did?' and they do just that the next day, forcing them to overturn the lex oppia.

The ancients did not have the terms 'communist' or 'marxist', but they had one such term for a morally evil revolt by women: the Lemnian crime. There was a myth of the women of the island of Lemnos rising up in a revolution and killing all the men (only one man is spared, the king, by his daughter). 'Lemnian crime' (Λήμνιον κακόν) became a turn of phrase about this sort of revolt, and the Greeks famously parodied a communist-like government in The Assemblywomen. Cato references secret cabals and plots in his quote, and we have plenty of those.

Anything that falls short of the real answer will inevitably fail. No one cares about the whinings of lesser men and weaklings, who got us here in the first place and call great men of genius 'megalomaniacal', in the words of Francis Yockey.
>>
>>545445846
>>everyone is a jew
I didn't say that
>>
>>545445846
every non-Christian is an edomite cuckold (over 70% of them are cuckolds)

They hate Truth, Love & Wisdom.

The UK Mohammedan is quite an angry jackal of satan.
>>
>>545445374

I wouldn't call elephants, dolphins or orcas are retarded. Just literally copy pasta their times normalised to 90 year expectation.

I'll give you a shitty AI dump, tonnes of literature supporting number of engaged hours:

• The Milkie, Nomaguchi, and Denny Study (2015)
• Published in: Journal of Marriage and Family
• Data Source: U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) – Child Development Supplement
• Core Finding: This massive longitudinal study found that the sheer quantity of time mothers spend with children aged 3–11 has virtually zero correlation with academic achievement, behavior, or emotional well-being. However, high-quality, engaged time (e.g., family meals, reading together, one-on-one talking) strongly correlated with positive behavioral and emotional outcomes. Interestingly, for adolescents (ages 12–18), the quantity of direct, engaged time with both parents significantly lowered delinquent behaviors, drug abuse, and risk-taking.

• The PARENTIME Project (2018–2024)
• Led by: UCL Institute of Education and funded by the European Research Council
• Methodology: Linked 24-hour time-diary survey data with comprehensive administrative registers tracking children into adulthood.
• Core Finding: Moving entirely away from raw hours, this project mapped out "instantaneous parental enjoyment," multi-tasking, and the sequence of interactions. The study proved that widening socioeconomic inequality gaps in children's literacy and socio-emotional skills are heavily driven by the divergence in how parents allocate educational and attentive time rather than household income alone.
>>
>>545445951
The last time I posted this, I had a mad retard spamming me with how great it was to give women rights, spamming a female feminist author's book, and how great the revolutionist Gracchi were, who were cited in the French Revolution and poison every Latin class. Lol. Absolute mess. But all things are balanced in the end. If not, the Jews would not be kicked out so many times.
>>
>>545445963
You pretty much enumerated everybody
>>
>>545445773 >>545445982
>I blindly worship like a typical uneducated retard.
lmao... The entire Mandaean religion propagated the ancient secret that Jesus was a rebirth of the deity "ADNI" (Adonai), who was an Edomite God that the Hebrew played the harlot with.
>>
>>545445374

You do understand the easiest way to take away 'equal' rights for women is to enforce children's rights?

• The UK Millennium Cohort Study (Del Bono et al., 2016)
• Published in: The Economic Journal
• Methodology: Followed thousands of children born in the UK in the early 2000s.
• Core Finding: Documented that early maternal time investment is a major determinant of skill formation. Active engagement in the earliest years—such as reading, singing, and direct conversations—had long-lasting, direct effects on a child’s long-term cognitive capabilities, even after controlling for parental wealth, background, and subsequent schooling

• The National Survey of Children's Health (Waters, Salinas, & Kirby, 2023)
• Published in: Journal of Pediatric Nursing / PubMed
• Methodology: Cross-sectional analysis of 17,855 children aged 1–5 in the United States.
• Core Finding: Evaluated parent-child quality time based on weekly frequencies of singing/storytelling, reading, and shared meals. The study found a massive correlation with "child flourishing"—a composite metric measuring healthy attachment, life contentment, early learning, and resilience. A specific deficit in interactive singing and storytelling heavily predicted lower childhood flourishing.

• The British MRC National Survey of Health and Development (Marryat et al.)
• Data Source: Britain's oldest birth cohort study, tracking individuals from birth up to age 60–64.
• Core Finding: This study evaluated the effects of recalled parental care (warmth and attentive affection) and psychological control up to age 16. Offspring who experienced higher parental care and attentive bonding showed significantly higher life satisfaction, happiness, and mental well-being decades later into midlife and older adulthood.
>>
>>545446073
fortunately christcucks are a global minority
>>
>>545445757
Yes, the same communists who also fight against drugs and homosexuality, when they're at home. What communists do at home is different from what Jews like Betty Friedan (whose real name is Betty Goldstein) do when they want to subvert the societies of the Gentiles.
Betty Goldstein, incidentally, who is one of the most important figures in modern feminism, was a radical Marxist, spent her entire youth in subversive communist movements, and invented a whole story about the hardships she endured in her suburban life as the "ideal wife" (which her husband revealed to be a complete lie, she was never an ideal wife), all to sell to women, on an emotional level, her attempt to destroy Gentile society, which she (like every Jew) hates.
You shills are just the latest useful idiots in this never-ending conspiracy.

Feminism was conceived to destroy Western patriarchal civilization, because Jews wanted communism in its place. It has nothing to do with women themselves, so much so that, in fact, feminism is detrimental to women.

And finally: women aged 16–20 are the most fertile, and they should be the ones men marry. It has been this way throughout human history, and it should remain this way. The more men realize this, the better the chances of reversing the genetic degradation that produces human trash like you.
>>
>>545446120
you can continue lying but we do not care for the lies of the non-Christian.

You neither have Truth nor Wisdom, it would be foolish to take you seriously.
>>
>>545445374

Last one but again the subject is as exhaustive as it is ignored.

I do agree with your assertion that older siblings do step into the parental role. Do you not think that role is better with more age gap, as in a 20 year old would be far better at looking after a 4 year old, and in there development curve timing in the case of 8 year gapping Vs lord of the flies 16 year old looking after a 10 year old?

• The Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD)
• Led by: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
• Core Finding: Monitored children from birth through age 15. It proved that maternal and paternal sensitivity (a parent's ability to notice, interpret, and accurately respond to a child's cues during direct interaction) was the single strongest predictor of a child’s emotional regulation, social competence with peers, and academic success.
>>
>>545446293
lmao... you christians are so fucking stupid.
>>
>>545446424
you are a fool for you are edomite cattle.
>>
>>545446259
Why did you write a wall of text to cope that Tsars had high age of consent and Bolsheviks lowered it
You completely agree with communists but then cope about it in 100 paragraphs
>>
>>545446206
There is a huge Christian revival in Gen Z btw
>>
File: Alleluljah.jpg (3.9 MB, 3371x6897)
3.9 MB JPG
>THE BRIDEGROOM IS CUMMETH!!! ALLELUJAH ALLELUJAH!
>>
File: CHRISTIAN SCIENCE.jpg (45 KB, 742x499)
45 KB JPG
>>545446508
>Christcuck reads bible
>one book wonder
>chucks Jew cock
>chucks Christian Academic cock
NO.. I'm educated, you retarded dumbass.
>>
>>545446755
You are a pedophile
>>
>>545446553
Are you retarded?
Why wouldn't I agree with communists when they make decisions that clearly benefit their nation? They defined "sexual maturity" as the age of "consent," as has always been the case throughout history. How many members of royal families inn History had to wait for girls to start menstruating before finally treating them as adults?

If a fag tells you that you should wash your hands before eating, are you going to disagree with him just because at night he lets another fag stick his penis in his anus?
>>
>>545446259
>Betty Friedan
100% correct.

Ignore the spiritual semite/bride of christ Judaeo-(((Christcrazies))).



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.