Give me ONE valid political reason as to why I shouldn't be allowed to walk around in public dressed as a latex pupper>b-but it'd be too shocking for the kids Not a valid reason
Because violence will be directed at you.
>>545441708Violence is against the law though.
>>545441631what is this costume, why do you wear it ? human skin needs breathable material for clothing.
>>545441631>brasilI really see no reason to. Have fun in the favela.
>>545441631Because you look stupid
>>545441957So?Is it invalid to tell children not to walk around alone at night?I mean of someones rapes/abducts/kills them, that's ILLEGAL!!!!!
>>545442153It's hot >>545442263Imagine not having italian citizenship >>545442338That's a subjective take>>545442517I get what you're saying, but I'm asking why should it be illegal or something like that
>>545441631Your fetish is to walk around in public dressed in latexMine is to deglove people who are walking around in public in latexIf yours is allowed so is mine.
>>545441957aren’t the laws in favelaland made by whoever is holding the largest machete at the moment?
>>545442819Your fetish hutrts other people though, mine doesn't
>>545442996I don't give a fuck, you are forcing your fetish on others, i will force mine on you.
>>545442720>but I'm asking why should it be illegalFor your own safety.
Legality is based on norms and social contracts. If no one around you wants to see it, expect there to be laws against it. That's all there is to it. If you want to fuck someone in public and the society doesn't want to see you doing it, they're going to make deviancy laws against it.Don't conform to society, don't be surprised when society forcefully exiles you from it either through jail or social stigmatism. There is no grand individualism argument one can possibly make that ultimately trumps the masses collective desire for stability, and coherency.
>>545441631You're a faggot and faggots should die>>545442996>mine doesn'tAny healthy person would feel hurt by witnessing your faggotry
>>545442995In some places I guess, but in my gated community it's pretty peaceful though >>545443036How am I forcing itt? You don't need to look >>545443047But I want to take the risk :(
>>545443220And you don't need to be a faggot, but here we are.So you get outside and get degloved, that's what's going to happen;
>>545443220>But I want to take the risk :(Should I be allowed to walk up to 5 year old girls naked? If no, then it's no to your question too.Simple as.
Your disgusting coomerism doesn't need to be displayed to further erode the fabric of civilization.
>>545443141I get what you're saying, but at the same time society wouldn't work properly if we outlawed stuff merely because people find it unpleasant. I understand outlawing sex in public, but here we are talking about an outfit that isn't intrinsically lewd, so I don't see a bigger reason >>545443146You shouldn't make assumptions, I've never said I was gay (yeah I happen to be, but it's beyond the point)
>>545443444Lol. You're so unreasonable. >>545443503That's different though, that person would be showing off to kids. I would be dressed and wouldn't show off to anyone, if people happen to be around I'm not to blame >>545443520Women are allowed to wear miniskirts and yoga pants though. How is this fair?
>>545443963>Women are allowed to wear miniskirts and yoga pants though.They should not be allowed to di that either. Because then faggots come along and demand to be allowed to be indecent in public too. See how that works? The deteriorating of public behavior? Next thing people will start to demand to be allowed to suck dick in public transport and soon we'll be back to acting like feral animals again. You know what else feral animals do besides fornicating with zero shame? Mauling with zero consideration. So get it together and behave ffs.
>>545443963>That's different though, that person would be showing off to kids. I would be dressed and wouldn't show off to anyone, if people happen to be around I'm not to blameBut kids would see you. So it's no different. And you are to blame, you are the one choosing to walk round like that.
>>545441631>Give me ONE valid political reasonI won't.But if I see your sorry ass out there, I'll bring a big bottle of ethanol, dump it on you so you're covered from head to toe and then light you up.I'll stick around to see you get roasted slowly while your faggot outfit melts and your body gets covered by 3rd degree burns and worse.Then I will piss on your still smoldering corpse.This is what every faggot who openly flaunts his faggotry like you deserves.
>>545443963I'm being *incredibly* reasonable, your rights are the same as mine, if your fetish is allowed so is mine.
>>545444541This anon is right. My fetish is to drive over people wearing latex. The way it sounds when the rubber of the tire squishes the latex into the flesh gives me an eargasm. My fetish is as valid as OPs, so I see no reason why his should be allowed and mine shouldn't.
>>545444229I'd be the first to tell you sucking dicks in public is not cool though. We need a reasonable compromise here, that's what democracy is all about >>545444394A kid would be confused at worst, maybe he'd find it funny. It's not a big deal. >>545444538Then you would go to jail and stay there, it'd be terrible for you.
Open displays of affection should be limited to holding hands and a modest kiss. Lust shouldn't be displayed in public
>>545444788>A kid would be confused at worst, maybe he'd find it funny. It's not a big deal.That's an assumption. They might well freak out or become scared. You could easily argue nudity is more normal to them.And scared kids can create hostile parents. So again; for your own safety.
>>545444788The reasonable compromise is your sexual behavior stays inside your bedroom and even that is already extremely generous.
>>545444788>Then you would go to jail and stay there, it'd be terrible for you.No, not really.With how corrupt our society and legal system is, I'd get a pat on the wrist after greasing a few palms and getting a 'he's mad so he's not really responsible for his actions' medial certificate, followed by 2 years long probation and a couple of mandated shrink visits.So unless some other faggot would appear in that time frame forcing my hand I wouldn't see inside of a cell at all.
>>545444805What if it isn't lust though? Maybe I just feel comfy dressed as a pupper. >>545445026Plenty of kids get freaked out on Halloween as well. >>545445041Dressing in an outfit isn't inherently sexual.
>>545445430>Plenty of kids get freaked out on Halloween as well.Which is one designated singular day per annum based on thematic horror-lite and entertainment, that society has a general consensus on.You choosing to display a sexual fetish costume multiple times a year to an unconsenting society is not an apt comparison.
>>545445430>Dressing in an outfit isn't inherently sexualIt can be, depending on the outfit. The OP is an example of it being not only inherently sexual but explicitly and vulgarly so.
>>545445080Then my family could buy a judge as well. It wouldn't be worth the risk. You should hate people who are actually making worse you know, like the elite. >>545445713How is it explicitly so? A person not familiar with it would never guess it
>>545442517>Is it invalid to tell children not to walk around alone at night?>>545442720>I get what you're saying, but I'm asking why should it be illegal or something like thatthere's already laws that make it illegal for kids to be outside at nighthttps://www.youthrights.org/issues/movement/curfew-laws/
>>545446287>How is it explicitly so?>skin tight so it leaves absolutely nothing to the imagination Idk anon, you tell me. We both know you know it's indecent but you're just acting optuse for the sake of it. Grow up.
>>545446647Hmmm fug, you do have a bit of a point...
>>545446920Thank you.
>>545441631it publicising your fetish as a form of voyerism
>>545441631>>545441957
>>545447174But in private and during specific festivals you agree it would be fine, right?
>>545442720>>545442996>>545443220
>>545447516No, I don't think it's good for a person to indulge in their lust like this the same way I don't think it's good to indulge in all your food cravings or to act on intrusive violent thoughts. That said, it's not my place to forbid people to do certain things even if I would prefer them not doing those things. I'd rather they would cultivate a sense of self control out of their own free will because they understand how indulging in every whim always leads to destruction and corruption of the mind, body and soul at some point and that there's absolutely no reason to indulge in destructive things when they could find pleasure and happiness in wholesome ways instead.
