>"I love dark humor" guys when the jokes are about charlie kirk
>>545605009KEK
please
Charlie Kirk hated Nazis
>>545605009>this kikesucking jew worshipper was a nazi you guys
No dog in thelis fight, but I noticed though that the comments made in the wake of Kirk's death were often sneering insults and ideologically driven - they weren't necessarily examples of humour. Surely the OP isn't being disingenuous in pretending this isn't the case?
>>545605448haven't your heard, the israelis are nazis now, we've gone full circle
>>545605180This is 4chan, so you’re gonna have to clarify whether that’s a good or a bad thing lmao
not laughing now, are they?
Why would a Nazi cry for anti-racist activist and Israel Firster Charlie Kirk? Makes no sense!There's footage of Charlie Kirk screaming at somebody at a liveshow that the founding fathers weren't racialists.
>>545605009Nah, the majority of the "jokes" are just very unsubtle rage bait./pol/'s (or at least my) sense of humour is primarily based around making people laugh, with the ancillary effect of making people mad ("triggering the libs").Stuff like Kirk, while often amusing, is primarily done around making some form of group mad, in this case MIGAtards.This is almost all processed subconsciously btw, so most of them will be aware that you're being a faggot rather than funny.This is course then gets into a conversation about meta humour, finding it funny that people are mad about you thinking they're mad, but frankly I can't be assed since even this post is too long for my taste.TL;DR they aren't>u rLook at my flag buddy.
>>545605009it really do be like that
>>545605009One of the hundred leftist men in the audience could have plugged the bullet wound with their dicks
his death was funny tho
>>545605009WE ARE CHARLIE KIRK>WE ARE CHARLIE KIRKhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0RC2Z-V1I0
>>545605009>We've got them now xisters! Hit them til they cut their balls off as well!stay winning champs
>>545606100Elon Musk isn't GenZ you retard
>>545605009I always wonder if false equivalences like these are because you all are retarded or deceitful (or perhaps a mix of both.)It’s immediately obvious whether something is gallows humor or there is legit malice behind it. No one is ever confused about that until a bad faith lib left type comes around trying to make gotchas.I make 9/11 jokes a lot, but because I don’t have a history of supporting radical Islam and I don’t specifically hate people who work in tall buildings, no one has ever taken my jokes as gloating about the death of a larger group.However Charlie Kirk “humor” is just that, considering he was just the average liberal from 30 years ago.Right wingers have made Charlie Kirk jokes too and it was obvious to everyone that it was just gallows humor.I have now explained this to you Barney style although I shouldn’t have had to. Does that clear it up?
>>545606240ya seethe?
>>545606240what is this tranny even talking about?
>>545605009Fuck Charlie kike, literal shabbat observer, no joke.
>>545606240I should’ve checked the post for 1 post rabbis. Unfortunately this pos website is like 99% dumb bait now so there isn’t even any point in avoiding it. At least I saged.At this point it’s clear the mods only 404 good threads while leaving clearly rule breaking off topic low quality shit up so there’s hardly any use fighting it.Oh well, that just causes us to spread redpills on mainstream platforms
>>545606372I argue against the premise altogether.The idea that defending points is “coping” and caring about anything is “seething” is a third worldist way of conducting debate. Notice when you see two jeets arguing, it always devolved to “your sister is whore” “well I raped your sister bloody fucking!”Ironically this is also the way of debating in intrafemale circles.If you are a white zoomer, you should be ashamed for acting like a jeet and a woman at the same time instead of actually debating the facts of an argument Also caring about things is good. It’s why the west isn’t like India
>>545605009Because it's not the same. Kirk was a good guy. Nigger tranny clowns aren't.
>>545606637>>545606883Are you a big man? Huh? Yeah I'm talking to you! Do you wake up in the mornin' and say, "I'm puttin on my big boy pants. Look, I'm wearin' a belt. I got big boy pants on." Put on a little jacket, you go, you take you lunch 'cause you have big boy pants on? You got your big boy pants and your snack? I can say big loud things! I can be demonstrative! HUH!?
>OP is an absolute retard who believe making fun of a corpse is le dark humor and not just infantile cowardice and intellectual dishonestyYou have absolutely no idea what dark humor even entail, dont you? Pointing fingers at a corpse and going "he deserved it!" Isnt humor, its just being a faggot coward who is too dishonest to admit you wont (or more likely cant) even formulate a real argument as to why you disliked the dude, and in true coward fashion, instead of figuring out a clever retort or counteer argument, you simply praise to the choir thinking you're hot shit for it.Im not even angry, its just a pathetic sight.
>>545605009>blames trannies and niggers for school shootings>gets shot in a school shooting by a white guy
>>545606240So it's getting kinda old that every political personality that exists on the right is immediately denounced as a RINO or democrat-like person once they're no longer useful to you.
>>545605583the jews are the same terrorist gypsy thugs they were when hitler locked them up for a few years"nazi" is only a pejorative to idiots
they didn’t like this one
>>545607266Idgi>>545607343Everything he said there had data backing it. The only problems was he was morally inconsistent on Israel, and wanting to pick and choose where he implemented progressive ideals.This is why the 90s was always going to be a temporary transition period even if a lot of conservatives want to return to it and push pause.What the 90s was, was a time when we had the happy medium between traditionalism and progressivism.Progressivism at the time was implemented pragmatically based on what the public saw as reasonable.But the problem is your kids will always pick apart the contradictions and realize where you are being a hypocrite (even if pragmatically) and they will seek to purity spiral and implement your priors consistently. Which leads to what we saw at that lesbian bar in Massachusetts.They are actually just libs who actually believe their ideology, while the libs saying they are too extreme are just lazy libs and are tomorrows bigots. Just like 90s liberals like Kirk are nowThis is why you have to go all the way back to 1960 and can’t have the 90s back as alluring as it seems
>>545607295>too dishonest to admit you wont (or more likely cant) even formulate a real argument as to why you disliked the dude,Sure I'll bite. He was a christian nationalist. This is a bad thing that goes without saying, It's unconstitutional, period. His career and fame comes from dark money, likely israel. Someone pays him regardles, this isn't his mission, he's an actor for hire. His entire schtick was a traveling circus debating children and novice level political intellectuals for le epic own clips. I'm glad he's dead, and even more glad his death amounted to nothing.
>>545607612I criticized Kirk for years. So did many people. In fact he was hated amongst the dissident right until he died.What’s funny is while you were writing this, I coincidentally wrote a paragraph that debunks this idea by complete accident lmao>>545607909My question though, why are there so many libs here all of the sudden? Why would you go to a website you hate? For a few years back when I used this site more, the shills were always concern trolls who supposedly agreed with you on everything except one point at a time.Now it seems there’s a bunch of Unironic destiny style shitlibs here that I had assumed had almost gone extinct
>>545605009I love Charlie Kirk jokes when they are funny. I love the "it's just a joke" crowd when it's everything else.I think my only issue is that Charlie was killed for going against Israel which I thought Leftists where against? It's weird to cheer on Mossad hits squads while pretending to be against Israel.But whatever Libs have never been logical
>>545607947The thing is, your ideology will die out with you. Secular Americans won’t even exist in 150 years. The only white people that will exist will be Christian’s.Literally failing evolution is the most objective failure metric for an ideology that we have on earth. The founding fathers also took it as a given that the constitution would only work in a white Christian society. You are essentially touting the straussian interpretation which was made by a Trotskyist Jew, and was adopted by neocons in the 70s.
>>545605009>"I love dark humor" brats when I try to rape them as a joke
>>545608157Hmmm yes fireworks for the man people hated. Yup.
>>545608373I disagree.
>>545608373What’s funnier is that Strauss founded neoconservatism when his fellow trotskyites refused to make Israel an exception to their anti colonial rhetoric. He wanted rules for thee not for me, so he decided to just sneak progressivism into the right wing, hidden behind heavy handed foreign policy rhetoric
>>545605009>"Kirkiversary" troons when I start up "Floydiversary" where we dress up with heroin needles in our arms and fake dollar bills
>>545605009>man has biggest head in human history>sniper shoots him in the neckNot sure if flexing or worst aim ever.
>>545605558>sneering insults and ideologically drivengroid floyd and that one retard that got stabbed to death in front of his gf got the exact same treatment. Why the double standard?
>>545607947preach brother
>>545605009doesn't that cut both ways?so act like a victim all the time.... and then you're a piece of shityou are no different than the school shooters
>>545608429>>545608463I listed facts. The only thing I said there that wasn’t an objective fact technically is that failing evolution is a failure metric. Technically you could disagree and claim it’s great. Maybe killing oneself is the most noble thing, it’s unfalsifiable. What is falsifiable however, is that the morals you base your ideology on, will cease to exist without you and by purity spiraling, by your own metrics you will have made the world less moral, without you to enforce morals. All because you wanted to purity spiral and couldn’t make pragmatic limits.I don’t really get the first post but it doesn’t sound like it addresses anything i said
>>545608429Oh I get it now. Where do you think you are right now? Is this the GOPs official forum? Is that where you think you are? Who do you think you’re talking to? Mitt Romney? I figured it was a given because of where we are, and the fact I specified dissident right, who I was talking about. I’m not talking about the mainstream GOP or tpusa rallies. We have forced those people to start approaching our topics through years of infighting and they continue to be our biggest enemy even above the left. It’s shocking to me sometimes how little lefties understand their opposition. I’ve read all of your philosophers and theorists, yet you don’t even understand the basic factions of the modern right.It’s like arguing with a brick wall…
>>545608828>I listed factsNope. You listed lies, such as:>your ideology will die out with you.My ideology is the constitution as it stands. It will not die out with me.>The founding fathers also took it as a given that the constitution would only work in a white Christian society.The constitution specifically seperates cults from the state. It is designed to limit you.
>>545605009National Socialists did not give a shit about his death.We've always considered him a kikeslave trying to make young men into neocons.
>>545609468He died. Get over it.
>>545607010Lol seethe
>>545609519Secular Americans have negative birth rates. This is fact. When projected out, unless something crazy and unprecedented happens, you will not exist. Sorry it’s true. Even your own side admits this when framing it by race and says it’s a good thing.I was paraphrasing the founders themselves. Separation of church and state was designed to protect churches from state interference. Nearly everyone was Christian dissidents who ran from monarchies in the beginning. The founders were very clear that this was supposed to be a white Christian nation and objectively said that in their own memoirs.You are arguing the straussian interpretation created in the 20th century, even though you don’t realize it>>545609612I didn’t like the guy personally, but it’s the lefts reason for celebrating that I think is shitty. Essentially by celebrating a 90s liberals death, they are implying the average rural American should be killed
>>545605149kek
>>545605009>1pbtidThing is, you leftists lack the capacity for humor
>>545607947>debating childrenThey were almost always college aged or older, but thanks for admitting your ideology only attracts mental children
>>545605009I look like this and say this.
>>545610255Also his debates were open to the professors, but they often refuse to debate anyone not in line with the progressive academic cult.Really it’s because they know anyone without an academic career to protect will pick it apart. Even someone of average intelligence like Kirk who had his own glaring inconsistencies in his own ideology
>>545605009Remember Alex Pretti and Rene Good? They are your Charlie Kirk. There will be more too.
