begs the question: WTF don't we have an option in all major elections to select: I DON'T CHOOSE ANY OF THESE SCUMBAGS which would then result in a do over until these assholes produce candidates the MAJORITY of citizens actually want to vote for?sources: According to the University of Florida Election Lab, the latest preliminary figures (as of Nov. 5, 2026) show approximately 48.76% turnout of the voting-eligible population (VEP), or about 122.7 million ballots counted out of roughly 251.6 million eligible voters.This is the second-highest midterm turnout rate since 1914, just behind 2018 (~50%).Earlier estimates on Nov. 4 were slightly higher (~49.4% / 124.3 million voters); the current figure reflects ongoing updates.Totals remain preliminary. California and Washington (all-mail states that accept postmarked ballots) are still counting, and final certified numbers will come later.Sources use the standard VEP measure (citizens 18+ minus ineligible felons, adjusted for overseas voters). Registered-voter turnout is higher but not the usual “eligible voters” metric.
Nah we should all stop voting until a literal president Camacho gets elected to show what a farce voting is
>>545703441They actually made it to 110 this year. I think Singapore or Indonesia or something
>>545703441>>545703571You’re brown
>>545703441I think you could do that by just submitting an empty ballot
>>545703441This person actually reminds me of myselfI have been such a jew recently
>>545703785
>>545703441Why hasn't anyone formed a party the 51% would want to vote for?
>>545703441>half of elegible voters didn't vote>dems gained 20 million votes, just like 2020
>>545704853They aren't allowed to form. Tptb make damn sure of it.
>>545704853to actually answer your question, one simply needs to look at the state of pol right now. most of them absolutely despise the political process in general.moloch vs baal and >trannifying your children vs 30 billion dollars to israelis an actual political belief in the disillusioned majority. Often when people actually do feel represented, they will vote. When not, they wont. Simple as.Here i literally have the option for the islamic shariah law racist party, hence i go out and vote.
U.S. Presidential Election Turnout (VEP) + Major Candidates, 1800–2024Turnout = voting-eligible population rates (UF Election Lab / McDonald; Burnham pre-1948). Early figures are estimates. Winner listed first.textYear | Turnout | Major Candidates-----|---------|-----------------1800 | 32.3% | Jefferson (DR) vs Adams (F) [House decided]1804 | 23.8% | Jefferson (DR) vs Pinckney (F)1808 | 36.8% | Madison (DR) vs Pinckney (F)1812 | 40.4% | Madison (DR) vs Clinton1816 | 16.9% | Monroe (DR) vs King (F)1820 | 10.1% | Monroe (DR) — unopposed1824 | 26.9% | Adams (DR) vs Jackson, Crawford, Clay [House decided]1828 | 57.3% | Jackson (D) vs Adams (NR)1832 | 57.0% | Jackson (D) vs Clay1836 | 56.5% | Van Buren (D) vs Harrison + other Whigs1840 | 80.3% | Harrison (Whig) vs Van Buren (D)1844 | 79.2% | Polk (D) vs Clay (Whig)1848 | 72.8% | Taylor (Whig) vs Cass (D)1852 | 69.5% | Pierce (D) vs Scott (Whig)1856 | 79.4% | Buchanan (D) vs Frémont (R), Fillmore1860 | 81.8% | Lincoln (R) vs Douglas, Breckinridge, Bell1864 | 76.3% | Lincoln (R) vs McClellan (D)1868 | 80.9% | Grant (R) vs Seymour (D)1872 | 72.1% | Grant (R) vs Greeley1876 | 82.6% | Hayes (R) vs Tilden (D) [disputed]1880 | 80.5% | Garfield (R) vs Hancock (D)1884 | 78.2% | Cleveland (D) vs Blaine (R)1888 | 80.5% | Harrison (R) vs Cleveland (D) [Cleveland won popular]1892 | 75.8% | Cleveland (D) vs Harrison (R); Weaver (Pop)1896 | 79.6% | McKinley (R) vs Bryan (D)1900 | 73.7% | McKinley (R) vs Bryan (D)1904 | 65.5% | T. Roosevelt (R) vs Parker (D)1908 | 65.7% | Taft (R) vs Bryan (D)1912 | 59.0% | Wilson (D) vs T. Roosevelt (Prog), Taft (R)1916 | 61.8% | Wilson (D) vs Hughes (R)1920 | 49.2% | Harding (R) vs Cox (D)1924 | 48.9% | Coolidge (R) vs Davis (D); La Follette (Prog)
>>5457071921928 | 56.9% | Hoover (R) vs Smith (D)1932 | 56.9% | FDR (D) vs Hoover (R)1936 | 61.0% | FDR (D) vs Landon (R)1940 | 62.4% | FDR (D) vs Willkie (R)1944 | 55.9% | FDR (D) vs Dewey (R)1948 | 52.2% | Truman (D) vs Dewey (R); Thurmond, Wallace1952 | 62.3% | Eisenhower (R) vs Stevenson (D)1956 | 60.2% | Eisenhower (R) vs Stevenson (D)1960 | 63.8% | Kennedy (D) vs Nixon (R)1964 | 62.8% | LBJ (D) vs Goldwater (R)1968 | 62.5% | Nixon (R) vs Humphrey (D); Wallace1972 | 56.2% | Nixon (R) vs McGovern (D)1976 | 54.8% | Carter (D) vs Ford (R)1980 | 54.2% | Reagan (R) vs Carter (D); Anderson1984 | 55.2% | Reagan (R) vs Mondale (D)1988 | 52.8% | GHW Bush (R) vs Dukakis (D)1992 | 58.1% | Clinton (D) vs GHW Bush (R); Perot1996 | 51.7% | Clinton (D) vs Dole (R); Perot2000 | 54.2% | GW Bush (R) vs Gore (D) [Gore won popular]2004 | 60.1% | GW Bush (R) vs Kerry (D)2008 | 61.6% | Obama (D) vs McCain (R)2012 | 58.6% | Obama (D) vs Romney (R)2016 | 60.1% | Trump (R) vs Clinton (D) [Clinton won popular]2020 | 66.4% | Biden (D) vs Trump (R)2024 | 64.3% | Trump (R) vs Harris (D)Highest overall: 1876 (~82.6%). Highest modern: 2020 (66.4%).Source: UF Election Lab National VEP Turnout Rates (v1.4).
>>545704853because that remaining 51% would instantly vote for the "tear the one party mafia that is the US government to shreds" party if given the option. so they'll make sure that option NEVER presents itself.
>>545703441Elections are just an excuse the red-blue monoparty uses to hold power over you. Any actual alternative gets bribed, blackmailed, shut down or killed. I'm of the belief that Trump was an actual alternative back in 2016 and they got him around 2018
>>545707906i think it was right before covid that they compromised him and during biden's term that they corrupted him completely.
