If you want Christian-Zionist-neoconservatism etc, you go one way.If you want secular-third-world-socialism etc, you go the other. Split the the nuclear arsenal in half to produce a MAD stalemate and et voila! -problem solved.
Perpetual union. That question was resolved quite a long while ago.
>>545708998why not your mother with her ass cheeks?
yes, just like in divorce: both sides simply agree to split things fairly and that's that, except scaled up to hundreds of millions of people and nuclear weapons are involved. problem solved
>>545709447Works for Korea.
>>545709501you're right! china can have one side and israel can have the other.
>>545708998You can't leave the Union.
>>545708998It's geographically irreconcilable.There aren't "red states" and "blue states". It's a shorthand for state-wide elections, and the real partisan divide is between population densities. Blue cities are everywhere, and in every gap between them there are purple suburbs and red rural stretches.
>>545711377That's how most civil wars start.1861 with its clear boundaries (outside of Kansas) was unusualMost of the time it's like Spain in 1936, where everybody is mixed up together, and you first have to go though a process of sorting before clear front lines develop.
>>545708998>If you want Christian-Zionist-neoconservatism etc, you go one way.>If you want secular-third-world-socialism etc, you go the other.where do the white people and native indians who don't want to be ruled by jews live?
>>545711844native americans / american indians*(not indian americans)
>>545708998>Why doesn't the USA just split in halfno one will fight for it. the modern right are cowards, if you haven't been paying attention
>>545708998
