Arches are for winners only.https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16270705/Trumps-250-ft-memorial-arch-Washington-federal-panel-votes-construction-hurdle.html
>>545717245Now where are the snipers supposed to go?
Lame duck faggot orange nigger
>>545717245shut the fuck up faggot
>>545717245that article doesn't say why the judge stopped it or what the lawsuits and complaints by the district of DC and vietnam vets are.
You arent allowed to do big projects like this unless you are a winner and have power. Trump is just some loser now, i reckon theyll come for the ballroom next.
>>545717245What if he wins at being the biggest loser?
>>545717440Probably that it looks like a McArch as usual, how do you Americans make everything look like a cheap shit imitation for 5 times the price l?
>>545717245>random judges can overrule the will of the elected Presidentweird democracy you mutts have
>>545717245The judge should go stop the construction, then.
Miggers will defend the arch.
>>545717245>No, the construction of monuments is not an explicitly outlined, constitutional responsibility of the U.S. federal government. The U.S. Constitution does not contain any direct language commanding or listing the creation of commemorative monuments, statues, or memorials as a core function of the state.so fucking sick of this materialistic cocksucking faggot
>>545717746>t. HOA simp
>>545717245You build such a thing after a great victory. What victory did the USA have to celebrate? Trump acts more and more like east Euro gypsies do with all that gold obsession and other Kitsch
>>545717245>>545717440I THINKK you need to get approval of the local council and/or mayor and shit. Doubt Trump bothered with that
A victory to celebrate.
>Tanya ChutkanYa that’s a real American name. Fuck this shitskin just override the ruling with an executive order and build it anyways. Not that he should be focused on this stupid vanity project right now but still.
from the judges decisionhttps://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72301112/111/lemmon-v-trump/>Three Vietnam War veterans and an architectural historian sued in February 2026 toprevent the construction of the arch. See Compl., Lemmon v. Trump, No. 26-cv-544 (D.D.C. Feb.19, 2026), ECF No. 1 (“Lemmon Compl.”) ¶¶ 7–10. They allege that Defendants—PresidentTrump, Domestic Policy Council Director Vince Haley, the Executive Office of the President ofthe United States, and the National Park Service (“NPS”)—do not have the necessarycongressional authorization to proceed with construction of the arch. Id. ¶¶ 53–57. Nonetheless,on October 21, 2026, Defendants filed notice that construction of the arch could begin as soon asNovember 5. ECF No. 63. >The Lemmon Plaintiffs bring two claims. Count One asserts that Defendants’ Archproposal was ultra vires—in excess of legal authority and without congressional approval—inviolation of 40 U.S.C. § 8106, the CWA, the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42U.S.C. § 4332(2)(C), and the National Historic Preservation Act (“NHPA”), 54 U.S.C. § 306108.Lemmon Compl. ¶¶ 52–59. Count Two, brought against President Trump, alleges that thePresident’s actions have violated the Take Care Clause of the Constitution, which “limits thePresident’s power and ensures that he will faithfully execute Congress’s laws.” Id. ¶¶ 60–64. so some boomer who wants to be buried in Arlington and a have a good ghost view of DC doesn't want the skyline of DC ruined is the emotional aspect of the case, but he says Congress needs to approve changes of DC, is the gist of it.
>>545718266a literal Lemmon Party to stop trumps goatse
>>545717584Something looking like a "McArch" is not a legal argument. Tackiness sucks but it's not illegal. If it were, all of the jewish architecture from the last seventy years would be illegal.
