To be considered founding stock, you have to be 100% descended from English settlers with roots in America going back to at least before the Revolution. Outside of maybe Virginia a century ago, nothing could be further from the truth for southerners.20% of you have nigger dna(niggers aren't founding stock). 3-4% of you have kike dna, and 10% of you have injun dna. That automatically knocks out at least 34% of you from being considered founding stock(or even white for that matter).The vast majority of whites in the south arrived after the Revolution, in the early 1800s. Most of them were irish and scots irish. The few Englishmen that did live in the south before the Revolution were overwelmingly loyalist, and provided the vast majority of loyalist troops to the British. The south contributed effectively nothing to the revolution, and all of the battles there were fought by Patriots from New England and the Mid Atlantic(Virginia would have been considered the Mid Atlantic at the time).This isn't even taking into account the fact that you're probably the most mutted group in the country, largely in part to two things. 1, the south was never as xenophobic or racist as New England, so various ethnic groups mutted together in the south because the south was more accepting of various backgrounds. 2, mass rape and intermingling during the civil war, which mutted you even further with german and nordic dna as most Union soldiers were German and Nordic. Yeah, despite dixiefag cope about unions being le mutts, the union army was almost entirely german and nordic, with relatively few irish.The south was also opposed to and eventually sabatoged Calvin Coolidge’s immigration reforms, which effectively allowed the majority Anglo North to be overrun with Italians, jews, irishmen, and slavs. They literally killed the last bastion of Founding Stock Americans.tl;dr why do southerners larp as founding stock despite being half nigger half german/irish civil war rape babies?
Thank god every day I can trace my direct line back to the 1600’s in old rappahannock county
>>545726142apparently a 'cowboy' was the name for loyalists during the revolution, kind of the opposite of how they are seen now. I guess you would call them Canadian these days.>During the American Revolutionary War, "cowboy" (or "cow-boy") was a term specifically applied to pro-British Loyalist marauders and guerrilla fighters who operated in the "Neutral Ground" of Westchester County, New York, and surrounding regions
>>545726776Key Facts About Revolutionary War Cowboys• Role and Operations: The cowboys were pro-British irregulars whose primary occupation was stealing cattle and livestock from local farms and driving them to sell to the British garrison stationed in New York City.• The "Neutral Ground": They operated in the unpatrolled buffer zone between British and Continental forces, engaging in plundering, ambushes, and espionage.• The Opposition (Skinners): They were countered by the "skinners," who were generally aligned with the Patriot (rebel) cause and tried to stop the cowboy cattle raids.• Notable Figures: Loyalist leaders such as Lt. Colonel James De Lancey (who raised "De Lancey's Cowboys") and guerrilla fighter Claudius Smith were associated with these groups.• Origin of the Term: Unlike the later 19th-century image of the Western cattle herder, the 18th-century "cow-boy" was viewed by Patriots as a criminal, cattle-rustling outlaw and terrorist, while Loyalists sometimes viewed them more favorably
We have "Eidgenossen", which are people that have swiss ancestry since at least 1291. Many might be swiss, few are Eidgenossen. Americans should come up with a similar concept. >inb4 indigenous peopleI'm talking about civilized societies.
>>545726762why didn't you're family protect America, anon?
>>545726923the translation of 'Eidgenossen' is 'Confederacy' like your country's full name is Swiss Confederacy (Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft). I think they already came up with something like that.
>>545726142Plenty of French and Scots there too in the beginning
>>545727309and the reason for this is a Swiss is German, French or Italian. it can be many things as one.
>>545726762how much nigger, amerinidan, and irish admixture has your family collected since then? you can answer in spanish if you want to.
>>545727309The confederate? Yeah that makes sense. Eidgenossen here are also seen as basically the nazi kkk. To be fair, they usually are traditional and racist because otherwise they wouldn't have cared to try and trace their ancestry back that far.
>>545726142the english descent colonists are the one who mass imported african slaves.. why would you take pride in that?
>>545726142Shut the fuck up.>Amerigo Vespucci If you're not Roman, you're barbarian.
>>545726142The earliest any of my family arrived was around 1899-1902 as far is I can tell. Most came sometime after. My dad, the youngest had brothers and sisters who were born in Ireland, and we still have extended family over there and in the UK. My mother is a grand daughter of an old Russian/German couple.There's likely a kike in my woodpile, rather than a nigger, though I've found no evidence of either.The fuck am I then, OP?
>>545727951A mutt
>>545726142>t. lets his women be priests
>>545728322>is half nigger
>>545726142Yup. That's me
