The plane was flying at mach 1 and all it did was create a small hole on the ground.9/11 planes were flying much slower, and somehow the damage was much larger.
>>545769222>a much larger plane that carries 10x more jet fuel caused more damage to a glass covered skyscraper, than a small ass plane did to solid concreteyes?
stop noticing, you anti semite
>>545769222Yeah and read this, 9-11 was a heisthttps://www.wanttoknow.info/topics/deep-history/black_eagle_trust_fund.html
They say anything about the bodies?
Damage's relationship to speed isn't linear. If the jet had been going fast enough it would have just no-clipped through the planet and not damaged anything.
>>545769222>mach 1it was doing max 600 mph and that's not mach 1.Stop lying.
>>545769222Jet fuel melts bitumen.
>>545769222It was almost out of fuel.
>>545769222Did they find the passports?
>>54576955230,000 feet / minute = 340 mph
>>545769546>it would have just no-clipped through the planet and not damaged anything.I have done this in Space Engineers. The problem is you get stuck from gravity in the center of the planet.
>>545769222>a learjet 60 with low fuel is the same as a fully fueled 757You have a room temperature IQ
>>545770120Oh, I forgot. The 9/11 planes also had indestructible passports, which caused a lot of the damage to the buildings.
>>545770227Even though they were going to the Bahamas and had their passports, they didn’t have the indestructible versions. It costs extra. Like guacamole.
>>545769222Fuck up retarded schizo incel
>>545769222Were 9/11 planes leerjet sized?
>>545769222Energy is mass times acceleration squared. In the calculation mass is worth more than speed. Bigger planes even moving much slower have more energy when striking something. Basics physics. Pol is always right.
>>545771996This, as well as the difference between hitting a building or several of inches of pavement and concrete over dirt.
>>545769222The proof 9/11 was an inside job were the visible explosions seen afterwards. You see this in every red flag event where a plausible suggestion is made to divert from the reality. You saw it with Charlie Kirk and the JFK assassination. If Trump wanted he could do the same with Iran and allow Israel to destroy a U.S. carrier so Iran can be blamed for it.
>>545769222jet fuel can not melt asphalt
>>545769222>a small private jet impacting the ground is the same thing as a commercial airliner impacting an office buildingDo you think they build office building into the sky by piling dirt up each floor?
Ground is softA plane flying that fast and impacting like a lawn dart buries itself deep. It's not a cartoon explosion.
>>545769222We don't say bad things about the Greatest Ally on this board buddy
>>545769222our government isn't competent enough to pull off 911
>>545769222brooo... thats crazy bro.
