should iq tests be required in order to vote?
>>54578017218?No
>>545780172DNA tests should be
3
>>545780243>>54578025530 you niggers
>>54578017219
the answer is 19 also you people have to stop using the word "eugenics" when discussing the mitigation of pathologically unproductive elements of our society. also you cant do labor camps. you have to find a way to euthanize or kill them while appearing to be ethical and moral (the way to do this is to draft them and send them on suicide missions, heads arush with propaganda)
>>545780172Alaska had an IQ test this time didn't it?
>>545780172I think it's 15. If you look carefully the cat is wearing a whistle everywhere except the last row, it's a perception test + a math problem.
>>54578017220 and holy shit the retards in this thread
>>54578017230The shoes = 10The cat = 5The whistle = 4Using BODMAS10 + 5 x 4 =30
20 ezpz
>>545780296>>545780313>>545780352perceptual blindness
>>545780296>>545780313>>545780352It's a multiplication. Ffs /pol/is really stupid, no wonder you are miggers
>>545780487Oh shit wait disregard this I noticed something, that cat doesn’t have a whistle. The answer is 16 because it’s 5-3 so its 2x3 + 10 =16
Answer is 16 you fucking retards
>>545780487>10 + 5 x 4That is 60 tho
>>545780172look anons, I think this IQ puzzle be tricking us, especially with its low res. We have to remember to count the whistles carefully. we got shoes (a), cat (b), and whistle (c)and we know 3 a = 30a + (2 b + 2 c) = 20b + (5c) = 13 so we need to know, a + b + c.Right, anons. Let's solve this carefully, keeping an eye on those whistles.We have:\[3a=30\]Therefore:\[a=10\]Next:\[a+2b+2c=20\]Substitute \(a=10\):\[2b+2c=10\]Divide by 2:\[b+c=5\]Our third equation:\[b+5c=13\]Subtract \(b+c=5\):\[4c=8\]So:\[c=2\]And consequently:\[b=3\]Finally:\[a+b+c=10+3+2=\boxed{15}\]
>>545780550Yea true, didnt notice it ither. Also what the fuck is BODMAS?
>>545780172The problem with democracy isn't low intelligence of the voters but their lack of moral standards.Intelligent psychos make matters worse than stupid ones. Much worse.
This thread is cooked lmfao
>>545780487two whistles are 4, one whistle is just 2, it's 16
>545780243>545780255>545780290>545780352>545780467>545780494these people would be unable to vote>545780464this figured it out yet still got it wrong>545780550only this person would be allowed to vote
>>545780649Democracy is a lack of moral standards, what is moral about enslaving people who disagree with you for having less numbers
>>545780464Bong anon is correct!
>>545780643indian shit, whites use pemdas
>>545780649>Doesn’t even try to solve the equation. >t.pollackKek
are we being retarded on purpose
>>54578017210 + 5 + 4 except its only one whistle so + 2
>>545780623 it's 16, you dingus
>>545780687>Can‘t even tell >> from >
>>545780723I think I'm wrong, I didn't spot the multiplication on the last sum: the final sum is trainers (10) + cat (3) x by whistle (2) so 26, not 15.
>>545780798if you use to many > your post gets marked as spam
>>545780810multiplication happens before addition, it's 16
>>545780643If I remember from school its basically you first solve whatever is inside the bracket/parenthesis, then the exponents, then division, multiplication, addition, and lastly subtraction
>>545780787This is some common core bullshit.10+3x2=26every calculator will agree.
>>5457801722 shoes = 10cat (with whistle) = 52 whistles = 4whistle = 2cat without whistle = 3shoes + (cat without whistle x whistle) = 16need a pic of the cat's feet though to know if he's wearing shoes at any point in this.
>>545780787oh fuck yeah it's sixteen... I failed to notice that they changed the plus to a times in the last bit. I fail again. Fuck it. This time I really gonna do it.
>>545780731rofl, those "equations" are solvable in memory by properly developed 8 years olds. You thinking that it's some kind of a challenge tells a lot about YOU. I wouldn't have assumed idiots like you being around even.
>>545780810cat is a 5whistles are 4one whistle is 2shoe is 10
>>545780893(10 + 3) × 2 = 2610 + 3 x 2 = 16
>>545780649True, only morons are obsessed with intelligence
L.I.G.M.A.Shoes = 10Cat + wistle = 5One wistle = 2Shoes + cat + wistle = 15
>>545780550we dont know if the cat is wearing any shoes
>>545780893the smartest bong
>>545780906>cat without whistle = 3trick question within a trick question!
>>545780947I've been doing it wrong all my life. No wonder I only got a C on my GCSE.
>>545780893
>>545780172Not an IQ test, but an expansive political science exam where you have to explain all mechanisms of congress, how federal vs state law works, what the supreme court actually does and you have to name all sitting senators.This test must be successfully completed every 4 years or you lose your voting loicense.This would protect this country from demented boomers, low IQ immigrants and other retards and most likely all women.If you don't understand the system you should not have a say in how it's run.
>>545780960sorry anon... read the thread... you were too hasty and you done fucked it all up.
>>545780172>>545780623Technically math doesn't really work that way for the same reason that 11 + 12 isn't the same as 1 + 1 + 12. You shouldn't assume that 2 whistles next to each other is twice of 1 whistle alone for the same reason, although that is the intention for this puzzle. Similarly it wants you to assume that the whistle on an image or not on an image of the cat should be counted as simply another whistle but numerical representations don't operate that way for the same reason as mentioned above.
>>545780172math is hard derp
>>54578017236 and no I'm not looking at the picture again to see how many whistles are missing.
>>545781044we need to see the cat's feet to know for sure
>>54578017210 + 10 + 10 = 3010 + 5 + 5 = 205 + 4 + 4 = 13 = (3+2) + (2x2) + (2x2)sneakers = 10cat faggot = 3whistle = 2answer 10 + 3 * 2 = 10 + 6 = 16
>>545781009Why is Microsoft doing this to me?
>>545780893it depends on weak or strong order of operations setting in the calculator
>>54578017214 YOU RETARDED FUCKS
>>545780787Best answer I've seen so far.High-IQ people know not only how to derive a correct answer but also how to convey that answer in a simple, direct way. Look at all the spergy obfuscators itt.
>>545781117because their calculator app was coded by indians
>>545781044Damn it no what this guy said.
>>545781117change it to Scientific mode and try it, it gives 16
>>545780921Still no answer.
>>545781042I think the image is fine, it's just stupid that its messing with us with its low res... It's like a trick question. And yes, 11 is its own thing. It is not two ones put side by side. That's just one way of depicting 11. Another is to write the word eleven. Or we could write the word in Morse. but it will remain 11, a Platonic 11. So in are illustration, I think we can allow them to count the whistle worn round the neck of the cat as an instance of a whistle. But the low res is a bitch because we can't be sure the cat isn't wearing two whistles. However, I think you've got a point because in the final line, while that cat is not wearing a whistle, it is also not wearing a string around the whistle. What if we factor in the the string as (d)? Will it turn out that d = 0?
>>545781042Yeah the whistle is even mirrored too, it'd be like thinking 9 = 6 because they are the same symbol
>>545781243It's ok. I now accept I've been taught wrong. The answer is 16 and I'm slinking away. Peace.
Answer is 16 or 15 depending on if the cat with whistle is added or just multiplied to the cat (3 vs 2.5)
>>54578017216, unless I missed something
>>545780172Shoes = 10Cat character = 5Whistle = 410+5x810+40=50
>>545781332X2
actually anons, I've been looking at the original image again. I'm not even sure it is a cat. I think it's some other kind of creature just wearing a funny cat ears hat. I'm not sure how this changes things.
>>545780172>>54578024320iq tests should be required in order to live.
My sources in Pickaxe Mountain have confirmed that Iran is going to strike Tel Aviv tonight
why is /pol/ this stupid? you dummies could never solve integrations
No. Simply dragging your ass there to fill the form is some degree of intelligence. At least for those that find democracy adequate withstanding
>>545782096Actual gigamathematician speaking you never have to integrate anything
>>54578017210 + 5 x 4 = 30
>>54578017213
Brown board.
>>545781042This is why the original image is unsolvable. The correct answer is that there is not enough information to solve the image. That’s why it’s presented as an IQ test rather than a math problem. We cannot assume what one whistle is and we cannot assume what the muppet cat without a whistle is. If this were a GRE question, the correct answer would be “not enough information.”
>>54578024310+5=15 15x4=60
>>545780550>it’s 5-3Ah yes because of course 5+3+3=13retard
>>545780172Why? Intelligent people don’t vote
>>545780172I hate theseNot really iq test More like spot the minute differences test
>>54578017210+(5x4)=30 EasyEveryone else is a retarded nigger and I hate this useless forum.
>>545782697It’s 29.2 idiot, the necklace is 0.2
pemdasshoes are 10 each (10+10+10 = 30)furry thing is 5 each (10 + 5 + 5 = 20)whistles are 4 each (5 + 4 + 4 = 13)use PEMDAS for last one10 + 5 x 4 = 30 (Multiplication first, addition second, 5x4 = 20, 10+20 = 30)
>>545780172> Do you need IQ to votehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DspIbUciQyU>Slavoj Žižek - "Everybody in the World Except US Citizens Should Be Allowed to Vote"
/pol/ being a retards' board confirmed.Not all is lost for you guys though. You must remember that "stealing is bad". Memorize it. Then memorize it again. And then vote accordingly.You WILL get fucked in the ass ruthlessly if you enable the system where crookery is allowed. You simply don't have the brain capacity to survive in such chaotic environment. You _think_ that you are being smart; but you are being continuously outsmarted and exploited by bigger crooks than you.
> should we IQ before voting.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf_O53mZiko>"IQ Test | Why the Man Who Invented It Refused to Call It Intelligence | Zack Explains"children's IQ matters.adult's IQ is irrelevant: indoctrination matters far more- socialmedia-users and MSM users should be banned outright.- voters should be based on people who read and debate and study/educate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRTpOGP7kbc>"Service, Suffrage, and Starship Troopers | Feral Historian" (libertarian rightwing channel)IMO:#1 (Instead of Military Service) you should be be educated(PhD to vote.)#2 only the proles get 2A as safety valve.The tension should exist between people and govt. CONSTANTLY.
imagine thikning u are smart because u look at some funnie shoes and shit
>>54578017210 + 5 x 220
>>545780172Megafaggot you don’t even have voter ID, you already failed the IQ test.
>>545780172Oh my god how are so many in this thread getting it wrong? This is primary school shit.
>>545783081There's only 1 whistle on the last line, so that's x2 not x4
>>545780893Its 16 on a Ti-84 and if you're using anything else or method in this day and age you're an idiot. Always go with the majority consensual reality.
>>545780787>This
>>545780649It doesn't matter under the current reconstruction of democracy, you can be the most intelligent or moral but still know shit without an immediate, direct, one to one, experience with the people or matters you are called to decide for, democracy is supposed to be polycentric and decentralised exactly for this reason, so you only get to decide on the matters you are naturally the most qualified for. Otherwise you exceed its operational scale and forced to 'flatten' people and matters through filters for efficiency purposes, through procedures, legalisms, moralisms, charts, metrics, formulas, algorithms, and then confuse your subject with the little you have managed to measure.
>>545784723I don't believe in democracy myself. I am saying that it should work somewhat better (i.e. not be a complete failure) if above conditions are fulfilled. The solution is NOT some IQ tests in particular.
>>545785033It works ONLY through localized, experiential, practical knowledge that can only be acquired through hands-on experience over time, you can't learn much through observing your subject from a distance and filtering it through procedures, you are bound to erode and flatten people into somethign else for convenience and efficiency. Why have they classified us into consumers, producers, voters etc, is that all a person is? Would you reduce your mother, your friends or yourself to that? You just eroded social bonds and the nature of relationships, but also the nature of the human person.
>>545785033cont, well, /pol/ evidently couldn't vote if we had IQ tests BUT the society as a whole would not benefit from that as the anons would be just turned into slaves by "higher IQ" folks and that's it. And slavery is extremely inefficient in long run.
>>545780172
>>545785491What you are describing is not a political democracy anymore. It's normal small-scale consensus discovery.
>>545781111The cat doesn't have feet. It's just a head and part of the shoulders.
>>545785587It's political democracy and the product of an underlying ethos and tradition. >Greek communitarianism is a historical and political ethos and tradition, emphasising the self-reliant organization of society through local communities, assemblies, and collective decisions. It is a key element of Greek political thought, connecting ancient direct democracy with the self-government of modern times. It begins with the city-states and Athenian democracy with the participation of citizens in decision-making. Communities function as cells of survival, self-government, justice, and collective taxation. >In this context, an individual's character and goals are shaped by family, culture, and local groups. Every individual right is accompanied by a corresponding commitment to support the community. Communitarianism strongly embraces decentralization, viewing the centralized bureaucratic state with deep skepticism because it tends to turn citizens into passive and individualised consumers and producers, eroding local social bonds, the nature of relationships and of the human person, ultimately becoming a detriment to the cultivation of virtues and of human fulfillment. Instead, state power is limited to creating space, protecting, and empowering local communities.>This tradition often clashes with the centralized Western-style state.
>>545785587>>545785587To expand on it some more, there were two distinct forms of "science" and approaches to knowledge back then, episteme and mētis, the first is the decoupled and abstract scientific method approach, while the latter is the direct, hands-on experience approach. Or in simpler terms, it's the theoretical VS pragmatic knowledge. For example, a farmer knowing precisely when to plant seeds based on decades of local weather smells and soil feel is a pragmatic approach, a physicist using the laws of physics to calculate how an object moves through space is a theoretical approach. So when it comes to social systems, the pragmatic approach is always superior because humans are messy, unpredictable, and well... alive, you can't theorise that people will live exactly according to the abstract blueprint, you lack that ultra dense localised data to make the right calls. >In the 19th and 20th centuries, scientific forestry (episteme) was applied to European forests. Planners cleared away complex, messy ecosystems to plant neat, uniform rows of a single tree species for optimized harvesting. The local peasants warned against it, but were ignored. Within a generation, the lack of biodiversity ruined the soil, invited devastating insect blights, and caused whole forests to collapse. The "mess" the locals protected was actually a highly sophisticated, adaptive system.And this is the main shortcoming of ALL modern political systems, it's why everyone feels alienated or even worse, sees their own government as a hostile entity.
>>54578017216, retards.
>>545780172shoes 10head 1sifflet 210 + 1 x 2 = 12
>>54578017221 ?
>>54578017216 or 26 depending on order of operations.Shoes = 10Cat with whistle = 5Cat sans = 3Double Whistles = 4Whistle = 2(10 + 3) * 2 = 2610 + (3 * 2) = 16
>>545786618nvm im a retard, i've attributed two whistles to head instead of one.16
>>545780172I don't know. I don't make the laws so I have no business worrying about it.
>>545780172That's just elementary school level math, not IQ testing.
>>545785577o/
