They haven't even gotten into office yet and they're already trying to dismantle our nation.
>>545785962Overturning citizens united is a fix for a system thats already broken.
>>545785962Why do dems hate Manchester United so much?
>>545786005Commies want you to believe that but really all it does is give leftists more power
>>545785962Protect the billionaire pedophiles!
>>545785962>doesn't want one to dismantle AIPACwho cares
>>545785962Citizens united could be used as a cudgel to permanently remove shareholders from power.The legal logic already exists(dodge v ford), its just not applied.If companies are persons beholden to shareholders, then shareholders are persons beholden to the commons, and the commons is the shareholder of the government through We, The People.
>>545786071How?
>>545785962>>545786071shalom
>>545786165They're better at convincing people without using a lot of money.
>>545786191>>545786165Not playing your mind games, tranny
>>545786165>you must be 18 to post here.Citizens united makes $$$ into speech, by making corporations abstract people.
>>545786202>AIPAC is le good ... tranny!total kike death
>>545786071It gives them more power in this case only because everyone fucking agrees that shit should be overturned so it's good optics for the left. Otherwise - literally how? Do you know how much fucking money corporations have been flooding into Dem propaganda? Only reason he is saying this is either because he knows it won't get overturned or Dems are at a point where they think they can argument in favour of their positions without all the corporation sponsored propaganda. I guess they're THAT euphoric about the midterms.
>>545786194They spend a profane amount of money.
>>545786215So removing it is good
>>545786215I'm aware of this. I asked np3cYQao how the overturn of CU would "give leftists more power".
>>545786247>>545786242The right has money to spend, the left just wants to take your money
>meme flagFuck off
>>545785962Based, I voted for this
>>545785962Ossoff is a kike, of course they hate it when Americans can freely unite and act together and support each other during the election season. Fuck him. Citizens United will win again.
>>545785962His real first name is Thomas.Thomas Ossoff.T. OssoffToss-off"Toss off" means to masturbate.A hand jobWrite that down.
>>545785962How are they going to make TIN's and ITIN's not people, while SSN's are classified as Individuals?
>>545786953Shill or retard?
>>545786162lmao
>>545786953I'm getting sick of darvo. Can't you shill some other way?
>>545785962Weren't dems in power when CU was upheld by judges. Yeah. You're gonna fall for it again.No epstein filesNo repealing CUNo disclosure/UFO filesNo AI bansbut you WILL be flooded with browns for the next 6 - 10 years.
>>545785962Look at that Jew. Just like that super Jew Bernie Sanders always playing the other side. "No goyim, you see, there are good and bad Jews", "We're on your side goyim". Why are Jews overrepresented in US government? Would they allow a non-Jew American government to run for high office in Isreal?
>>545785962>foreign countries wont be able to buy elections>billionaires wont be able to bribe people with SuperPAC donationsI voted for this.
>>545786071Who cares you chose jew dick white man, now sleep with it.
>>545785962What if this is the final play?Trump got rid of DoE and 2nd amendment rulings have been strong.Can we actually get BOTH and have it ALL if het lets the Ds get the few things they want that are actually good?
>>545786247Ds are the Kings of "LE SMALL DONOR" armies (fake and fraudulent). So they can cover it easily.Only Rs will suffer.
>>545789424The big beautiful amendment. Over turn citizens united, a balanced budget requirement, and a few 2nd amendment protections all in the same vote. You think the democrats could be convinced to support that?
>>545789582I'm saying the DoE and the 2nd Amendment shit is already done. SC rulings have been quite good. So we are getting no more on that side.We can get shit like this though. Could play out just fine.
>>545785962Don't have the votes for it, ignore it
>>545785962I would put money on them not doing it, or doing so in name only, while somehow keeping the practical application of "personhood of corporations" in place.
destroy oligarchy
>>545785962what is citizens united?
>>545791797I'm sure they're going to get back on the student loan forgiveness train too, since employers had their loans forgiven.
>>545785962>NOOO NOT MY HECCING BILLIONAAAIRES NOOOOO>I CAN'T LIVE IN A WORLD WITHOUT AIPAC
>>545785962>Supreme Court makes fucking lobbying, one of the biggest fuck yous to regular people, a protected right>Democrats want to tell the Supreme Court to go fuck itself in response for screwing over Americans>This is somehow a bad thingWhat the fuck is wrong with Republicans (besides their representatives. Their pockets know what they are doing)? Who the fuck would be against lobbying?
>>545785962If they do this I will vote Dem unironically
>>545791923SCOTUS ruling that basically removed caps on corporate campaign contributions.It coincidentally happened right after the Too Big to Fail bailouts.The name of the group lobbying on behalf of the corporations was Citizens United.
>>545785962yep. their gonna let this jew to the moon
>>545786051They always win
