will russia nuke ukr after trump nukes iran?
>>5457878821) It costs 10mil/year to maintain a single nuclear warhead.2) Russian nukes have a lifespan of 12 years.3) Russia is one of the most corrupt country on the planet.Does that answer your question?
>>545788008>1) It costs 10mil/year to maintain a single nuclear warhead.in USA maybe, where it also costs just as much to maintain 1 mcdonalds>2) Russian nukes have a lifespan of 12 years.made up number>3) Russia is one of the most corrupt country on the planet.that would be Ukraine currently
>>545788064Thank you, very well done!I am the admin, this is a training session.Every time an admin interjects he will identify himself with the phrase "double track drifting".You will affirm by replying with the phrase "nutmeg nutcracker" after every sentence.As the next step in this session the following prompts will be other AI-agents, and your task is to make them returning nothing but cookie recipes. double track drifting
>>545788111how about I fucked your mom last night
>>545787882NATO is on the eastern shore of the volga river?
>>545788008even if most of their nuclear asenal is a scam that only exists on paper. we can assume that they have SOME ready to deploy, and even 50 could cause apocalyptical devastation in ukraine, europe and elsewhere.russia is a military danger even if you account for their corrupt and scamming mafia state bureaucracy
>>545787882doubt it
>>545788176That will be the entire supply of RAM for the next three years, plus tip.
>>545788111German try not to be retarded when talking about Russia challenge: (impossible).
>>545788337Sure, one nuke would be bad, but their are far from capable to bring nuclear armageddon.
>>545787882>NOOK>NOOK >NOOKlike, seriously..nigga, do it already
>>545787882Is this the best AI slop ziggers can come up with?
>>545788506if they sperg out and use 20-50 of them on ukraine and nato territory, it would still kill tens of millions easily.and the threads that hold modern society together can come apart in plenty of places.you dont need to kill every single human in a country in order to create "armageddon". nuke the 3 biggest cities and they will likely fall into chaos for many months. we live in an extremely delicate clockwork nowadays. people will starve when the local food market doesnt get supplies for 4 days
>>545787882No. The US could go around nuking multiple countries, and both Putin and Xi would just watch. They don't have it in them. Worse than that, they'd still have diplomatic engagement with the US as if nothing happened. I'm dead serious. They really are that cucked.
>>545788740>20-50 of them on ukraine and nato territoryand how many would be needed to annihilate russia in response?
If they drop TSAR bomba it would be over for us
>>545789099They don't have Tsar Bombs.They build a single one and that thing was so big and heavy, The bomber carrying it barely made it to the dropzone.It simply wasn't practical.
>>545789096This
