Jetpack demonstration videos are a part of a government propaganda campaign that goes back to the Cold War and the struggle against global Communist takeover. They began development under a Project Paperclip team. The Lydecker brothers who did the special effects for the king of the rocket men and the adventures of captain marvel used their same technique to make the jetpack scene in Lost in Space (1965)
>>545821674
>>545821674Have this too
What's your point?
>>545822616yeah I'm pretty sure all the VTOL tech like that pulpit was the same shit. I remember seeing something about the Titanic submarine that was fishy but I don't remember what it was
>>545823160https://humanoidsarefake.wordpress.com/
>>545821674the problem with them usually is they have really short flight time / range but a few years ago a frenchy crossed the english channel (22 miles) in 22 mins.
>>545823342Yeah right
>>545823478https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoW-19mdy4g
Could you imagine climbing a cliff then the rock gives way nonooonNOOOOOO!! I sensor in your watch notices a free fall and Elon jets pop out the side of your back pack and it jets you back down to safety. But the democrats want you to die because they hate Trump.
>>545823270This is just schizo babble fueled by sycophantic AI. Take your shit website offline and touch grass retard.
>>545823270This is stupid. Do you think jet engines are fake?
>>545823558Tether removal https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PRfV5TvRjEA&pp=ygUKQ29wdGVyYmFjaw%3D%3D&ra=m>>545823593Wrong answer, faggot
>>545823713No, I think they’re real, and I think the mini jet engines that are used in model aircraft I real, and I think they hypothetically could support the weight of a human, I just think the rocketbelt was fake and the new jetpacks are fake. And humanoid robots
>>545822616Wish that was me
>>545823845Why? so jet engines are real and computers to control them are real but companies would just waste time making fake ones>As for humanoid robots they have existed since the 80s. I don't get it
>>545824480It's a lot easier to fake a jetpack or a robot using CGI/AI than to actually make one. Like the mechanical turk, people thought that was real for 80 years
>>545824480Does this look real to you?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhK28R9J-DQ
>>545824806cgi didn't really exist in the 80s and if you're one of the schizos that think it did then I have nothing to say to you >>545824854Can you articulate what exactly you have issue with? Also there's all those influencers with that little robot guy that runs around. A ton of people have seen them
>>545825902>they didn't have movie effects before the 90's
>>545825902Yeah, that’s the Unitree G1, those videos use AI/CGI, you can tell particularly with the iShowspeed one. They’re illegal to import now for a reason, I write about it in my blog, humanoidsarefake.wordpress.com. CGI technology has been more advanced than what the public’s known about ever since it was first developed. Boston Dynamics made videos that people questioned if they were cgi, but people literally couldn’t believe that cgi could be that good
>>545826343Yeah, you don’t even need cgi for stuff like this https://m.youtube.com/shorts/muPPy7O3AKo?ra=m
>>545826343show me a robot that is indistinguishable from a photo before the 90s>>545826591> CGI technology has been more advanced than what the public’s known about ever since it was first developed.you need to prove that. Do you think maybe you have no point of reference for a fluid moving robot so it looks strange to you? And again people have seen these things at trade show and outside>>545826677a guy on a wire is a far cry from secret alien cgi that you apparently believe in
Why do some people choose such retarded hills to die on?You can easily prove that you can generate enough life to propel a human.
>>545827272*lift
>>545827055It’s high technology, of course the public is not going to be aware of its full development. First developed by darpa, a government military development agency. They worked with Boston dynamics, which started as a simulation company. But that’s not really super relevant to what I’m saying. The old rocketbelt demos were similar to David copperfield stage flying performances, with wires thin wires that don’t show up on the footage. Go watch Cris Angel or Dynamo or David Blaine levitate in front of people
>>545827272Yea dude, no shit, that’s not the question. The question is how a guy wearing skinny jeans doesn’t get burned by the exhaust of a miniature jet engine, how a woman’s pants aren’t ruffled by it, how people can maneuver in them while their arms are stiff. How come no other country developed a rocketbelt, how come only the US and China have jetpacks even though they only cost 100,000k to make and are simple enough for Chinese banana farmers to make
>>545827637because battery tech isn’t there yet and EM thrusters are still sci-fi meaning you need large quantities of fuel which in turn limits range, lift and speed.Because the jet is angled away from her pants, if they were ruffles she would get some very nasty burns.The ones on the arms just generate lift, you have another one generating thrust.The concept has been around for a long time, there are just no real world applications that can’t be done safer, cheaper and more effective by like a crane
>>545827975The same brothers who did the special effects for this movie, before jetpacks were inventedhttps://youtu.be/hmJLQbWtizgDid the special effects for this movie. This is supposedly a real jetpack. You really think so?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xNNmlv8Y3-c&pp=ygUbTG9zdCBpbiBzcGFjZSBqZXRwYWNrIHNjZW5l&ra=m
>>545821674>he doesn't knowPiston engines run on explosions.A proper air/gas ration will propel a piston further than gunpowder. Note that this is atmospheric air, not pure oxygen.You are retarded.
>>545828544What the hell are you talking about? Where in the fuck do you see a piston engine?
>>545828544Go on, genius, tell the schizo retard where the piston engine is. In your lawnmower?
>>545828544Paging Doctor Genius, your expertise is urgently required.
Damn. I didn't expect seething in response to an example requiring comprehension. You're not doing a very good job of pretending to not understand.
>>545830098Sybau or explain what you meant, because what you posted has nothing to do with what I’m saying and I don’t like being belittled by smug cattle
>>545830411An inability to fathom a device that does things indicates an issue with first principles.Hence, explosions. Either educate yourself, or be specific regarding your meaning.
>>545830525Holy shit that’s a stretch. I don’t have an inability to fathom. Next time read the thread before calling someone a retard
>>545830633You are welcome to check your OP for lack of clarity. Wouldn't want to be read as you have been.
>>545830742I think you just made an uncharitable reading and made assumptions about what I wrote, which is something you shouldn’t do if you’re gonna call someone names. No hard feelings though, it’s probably tough being smarter than everyone around you
Interesting. I did not know that.
>>545830883That subtle difference between "technological development is propaganda" and "technological development is also used as propaganda."Again. Check yourself. One of those reads as what you apparently meant. The other invites a different interpretation.
>>545830968Yippeehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP88rsuQ0K0&list=RDZP88rsuQ0K0&start_radio=1&pp=ygUcaSBkaWRuJ3Qga25vdyB0aGF0IHRoZSBib29rc6AHAdIHCQlYAqO1ajebQw%3D%3D&ra=m
>>545821674Those old jet packs were really hydrogen peroxide rocket packs, with literally only a few seconds worth of fuel.>>545822559This one is an actual mini jet engine, but it was way too expensive, noisy, and dangerous to be of any practical use.
>>545831009That’s weird I don’t remember typing either of those things you put in quotes. I’m saying that fake technological advances are used as propaganda, for entertainment, to make money, and to deceive adversaries. But keep fighting the guy in your head I guess. I’m sure you’ll win, you’re much smarter than him
>>545831177Yeah and they were actually just a spectacular western propaganda campaign, using thin wires to suspend and pull the pilots
>>545831295>freeclimbing enthusiast angry that safety equipment existsDaft fucking cunt. Do a fucking flip.
>>545831670Geez guys you’re so smart and your insults are so abstract that I’m having trouble comprehending them. I think I know what you mean though: I’m a free climbing enthusiast because I’m a free thinker, and these insults and this opposition is there to keep me grounded
>>545831670My guess is that you’re severely autistic
>>545821674>>545822559>>545823342Jet packs are fucking stupid. Literally just sci-fi bullshit. What are the applications for a jet pack? >You can fly!Yeah but you can do that with a helicopter, and at least that have military applications since you can strap missiles and machine guns to a chopper. Cant really to a jet pack since they need both hands, and rven if you can a single bullet will kill a jet pack trooper.
