Would you accept a digital ID/passport if it meant things were more efficient/convenient?>no multi-multi-multi-factor social security bullshit when applying for jobs>instantly know who's an illegal and who's a citizen>general bureaucratic hell greatly diminished in all avenues of lifeWhy or why not?
No. The government doesnt get to onions harder on me so it can do its juno easier when its going to fuck it up anyway. We have licenses, nost states dont check. We have borders, cops let illegals go. Fuck you and them data farmer
>>545841979No.
What exactly does a digital ID mean?
>>545842863every transaction you ever do will be monitored at all times and a dedicated instance of Claude Opus 6.9 will build an exact profile of your activities and decide if you're a terrorist "yet" but at least you didn't have to sign in to the Burger King app
Didnt ask. Dont care
>>545841979Only if Adolf Hitler Himself descended from the heavens to become leader of the Earth.
>>545845624Why did you choose such an innocuous and nondescript term like "digital ID" for that?
>>545841979i've not seen one hint in my entire life suggesting life will ever get better for whites in americanot a single oneyour life will continue to get worse and worse. poorer. more violent. more miserable.that is the only fact of life in america
>>545845802unpopular political ideas are packaged as euphemisms so that actors can deliberately disavow the controversial parts without ever having to address that they are necessarily part of the package to get the idea implemented"digital ID" at an absolute minimum is already in place in the United States, your driver's license is in a readily searchable photoiD database called "real ID" >The system used to share databases of identification documents between states and territories is the State-to-State (S2S) Verification Service, supported by the State Pointer Exchange Services (SPEXS) platform, developed by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) with federal funds.Therefore, advocates for "digital ID" are advocating the (illegal, privacy act violating) unsiloing of this information and the use of it in many public-private partnerships which inevitably leads to both parties storing information first for "regulatory purposes" and eventually for commercial and/or authoritarian useno one would support that, obviously, which is why the trick to to make the public not think to hard about how or why it's happening
Digital bill of rights needed first.
I'll accept millions of dead jews, regardless of efficiency
>>545846130But almost all of my purchases are made without any ID.And liquor stores don't actually report who their customers are to anyone, mostly they just look at the date of birth on an ID and forget about it.
>>545841979> Would you accept a digital ID/passport For you, yes absolutely.For free people like me, definitely not.
>>545841979No
None of you virgin chuds have ever been able to explain when asked why digital ID bad. All you ever do is sperg hysterically and shit your pants. So once again let's try, can someone explain a real reason to be against digital ID? Before answering, look up what it actually is since clearly none of you have the slightest clue.
>>545846350OP is advocating for those purchases to inevitably be made with IDfor example, here are "problems" "solved" by implementing a digital ID, particularly in the U.S.:>corrects sales tax attribution for remote purchases>catch people evading maximum substance purchasing limits or prohibitions due to criminal sentances (alcohol/gambling etc.)>better tracking heuristics = harder to do identity fraud/credit card theft>ensures compliance with state law(s) of citizen in question>verifies citizen statusfor the EU just swap "state" with "nation-state" and apply it across the whole union. As these very legitimate (but mostly gay) uses accumulate, the data doesn't just go away, now that a system exists it can be exploited publicly or clandestinely both by vendors and the governmentsimilar things have already happened to Americans with web traffic and mobile data, per what disclosures and leaks revealed in the 2010s, there's no reason to think this would be any different
>>545842106The only use it has is segregation. The government will use it to fuck white people. The people just want the freedom to be racist enough to be amongst their own kind.
>>545846861Okay but I think what you said earlier:>"digital ID" at an absolute minimum is already in place in the United Statesbased on your own definition:>every transaction you ever do will be monitored at all timesis false.
>>545841979>Would you accept a digital ID/passport if it meant things were more efficient/convenient?>get donut for injecting (((mystery juice)))
>>545841979>1pbtid data mining thread Get fucked
>>545841979>Would you accept a digital ID/passport if it meant things were more efficient/convenient?More than 80% of Greek population rejected the digital ID
no i fucking hate surveilance
>>545846777What does digital ID try to achieve? I specifically want those things not to be achieved. Is that enough?
