Or is that just for the middle and lower class?
>>545845039Yes, they love serial killers and drug dealers with tattoos.
They're attracted to good-looking bad boys. That's why Richard Ramirez and Jeremy Meeks had groupies but chud criminals don't. Hybristophilia is a myth. All that's happening is that the criminal record isn't dampening the normal attraction signals. It's an "in spite of" instead of a "because of" thing.
>>545845039Most middle class women are repulsed by criminals.
>>545845039Most gang member are on the dl
>>545845039They love ungovernable, violent men
>>545845119>>545845171>>545845906This is so retarded lol. It's like saying men all want porn stars, or alt girls with septum piercings.
>>545845039>>545845119
>>545845039The romance is: They want someone extremely dangerous, but they wont harm them... but thats where things go wrong, because they do
>>545845906>>545847826>>545845039These types of women want these violent or otherwise criminally inclined men for multiple reasons - one is the protector figure, the white knight, the gladiator that can't be assed to hesitate or something.Another angle is they want to try their hand at taking these 'no-bullshit hardcore criminally inclined violent beastly' men, and 'taming' then, in the classic 'beauty and the BEAST' delusional fashion. (LMAO it almost never turns out that way, does it?) Its also why a select few women have taken to going for the literal BEARS, or other manner of beasts.Slut shaming needs to make a grand comeback.
>>545845039No that's totally untrue. White women will still happily fuck a nigger even if he's never been arrested (yet).
>WomenHerbs
>>545847618No sukdeep, men want debt-free virgins with no tattoos who have never fucker a nigger. Much much rarer.
>>545847618>It's like saying men all want porn stars, or alt girls with septum piercingsNo. Because the sexes are different.
>>545849389Are you like the Emperor of Men or something? Why are you speaking for other people?
>>545849496>No.How?>Because the sexes are different.I've never contradicted this. Is your reading comprehension that bad?
>>545849808>Emperor of Men No, I'm just the Senior Vice President of Misogyny. So what part of my statement do you think men disagree with? Let's find out just how out of touch you really are.
>>545845119Aren't you supposed to keep your serial killing a secret and look like a normal dude in your day to day life?How would they know? "Vibes"?
>>545845039Some do, most don't. Believe it or not most women want a good man, what they don't want is a complete pussy who can't take care of them if it came down to it.
>>545847618female out, I don't even need you to show the titsthe equivalent wouldn't be porn stars/ alt girls but women who are slutty in the bed. the anal whore, the one who loves to deepthroat until she's sore, the anal fister, the roughouse one>>545850455most do - it's just that for marriage/long tem they prefer meeker men. and you get illusion that "most don't" because they hamper their instincts.and yea ton of the "modest girls" just tried them badboys few times and nobody knows about because if you have some oil in the head you can easily meet and fuck stealthily. >>545845119never without a girl to beat up, eh
>>545850867>some oil in the headPoland what do you mean by this?
>>545845039Starting to doubt it. Especially now that cost of living and such is biting hard. In safe, good times they crave self-destructive damsel in distress drama. But that doesn't feed them when both prince charming and hot criminal are broke. They then target good looking enough Dad types; the one's that ensured they were fed, clothed, housed, hugged, and safe when little girls. Foids also crave the safety and security of siblings and larger family dynamics.Expect the push for inclusivity now is polygyny.
>>545850012>Let's find out just how out of touch you really are.Why would anyone care what you think is out of touch or not lol>>545850867>the equivalent wouldn't be porn stars/ alt girlsYes it would be.
>>545849844>How?Men can simply fuck, that is to say, orgasm and be entirely satisfied. Men just need a hole (see: prisons, landwhale sexual activity, any men who are brow-beaten by their women). Women crave a story and development, and they want men 'good at being men', but not necessarily 'good men' (moral men). Given a less than legal past, they have both a story and proof that a man has a propensity for violence or otherwise 'what it takes' to somehow enforce his will.Take pornography intended for males compared to that for females, for instance, 20 minute max or so videos on all sorts of topics imaginable, or better yet, just single images vs entire libraries of smut, fanfiction out the ears, even fantasizing about romantic movies>I've never contradicted thisyou did when you implied both sexes want the same thing and adhere to the same standardP.S. the 'attraction to criminals' part doesn't include ugly freaks and dysgenic nutcases (e.g. poopjeet scammers and child molesters)
>>545854127>you did when you implied both sexes want the same thing and adhere to the same standardNo, this is all just random shit you added to what I wrote. You're dogshit at communicating lol
>>545847618Stop being a sperg. Normal people understand how generalizations work in language and don't need everything qualified with "95% of women" or whatever. When we say that humans have 32 teeth and 2 feet, it's understood that not all humans have 32 teeth and 2 feet. We don't need the sperg hall monitor pointing out the exceptions.
>>545845119especially when their black. Hollywood needs to be nuked
>>545847618Great to know your opinion foid, is that why you can't go one minute without cramming all your holes full with nigger dick?
>>545854230 see >>545847618>this dichotomy is so SILLY and WRONG. Why would women want criminals? that's like saying men wanting quick action would look for easy womenRetarded ESL. Probably brown or yellow, to boot
>>545845039They are pieces of shit inside so they feel more comfortable with scumbags
