Why would that nigger accept even a cent from them? 2000 bucks is nothing, he could just reject that to not ruin his career further. Hakeem got 1.5 mil
>>545850140that just a humilation rituation to swear allegiance to the migger cause
>>545850217kek'd but he is called RINO now isn't it? He voted all against tariffs
>>545850140Probably threatened to Ron Paul him.
>>545850140If I had to guess, (((they))) took him out to dinner at an expensive place and kept the receipt as a "AIPAC Work Dinner"
>>545850285To do what?
You know who didn't take a cent from aipic? Big yahu
>>545850616LMAO based bibiWhy would da jooz vote him out?
>>545850445To Ron Paul the Rand Paul
>>545850140I'm starting to get suspicious of thos track AIPAC shit, like one politician is listed as getting a literal 54$ dollar donation, like wtf? This is fucking nothing. Idk if some of these donations really signify any allegiance towards Israel. Like any random jew in AIPAC can decide to donate money to anyone, and plenty of politicians don't even handle the finances themselves. Some retard intern went sure whatever, any money is good and accepted the donation.
token, so that he can keep his jobonly other two U.S. Senators worth mentioning are Ron Johnson, and Eric Schmitt
>>545851225OpenSecrets is much better but it still lists Rand Paul 2k donation kek
How could he betray us like this
>>545851225>memeflag>AIPACAIPAC is *far* from the only D.C. foreign agent Zionist lobby in D.C.Dozens of them existAIPAC also last month *RENAMED* itself btwtaking its donations into the pac shadowsAlso on the trackaipac site, they favor Democrats now with the summary graphic:No longer do they just give an all-Red color square to Dems, they *grade* it based on 'are you doing well?'picrel (received much more money than OP pic)
>>545850267He's partially lolbertarian so being against tariffs is part of his base OS.
>>545851225>plenty of politicians don't even handle the finances themselves. Some retard intern went sure whatever, any money is good and accepted the donation.I guess this is the best explanation
>>545851367>GARCIA
>>545850386this
>The warning signs were there well before Election Day. An August Cato Institute/Morning Consult survey of more than 4,100 registered voters found that 75 percent said tariffs would matter in their midterm vote, and those voters preferred Democratic congressional candidates by 19 percentage points, 55 percent to 36 percent
>>545851654>Meanwhile, 74 percent said the president’s tariffs had raised prices at the checkout counter, including two-thirds of Republicans.
>(over and over and over x100) President Trump once called “tariff” the most beautiful word in the dictionary, but as the Journal’s Greg Ip recently observed, he “has somehow made it one of the most hated words in politics.”
>in a Cato survey this spring, 70 percent of voters said presidents should be required to get explicit congressional approval before imposing tariffs, including 56 percent of Republicans. >On Election Day, about 7 in 10 voters told the AP Voter Poll that Congress isn’t doing enough to check this deeply unpopular president.
>>545850140Romania can afford this
>>545852034Does Romania has its own PAC in the US?
>>545852092Nah we're bought off by jews also
>>545850140it should be clear by now that these graphics are often complete horseshit
