Is subsidising niggers the ultimate good?
>>545862629i dont like insurance companies or their practicesbut we already know what happens when some governing officialtries to fuck with insurance in a statethe insurers adjust their costs and insurancebecomes prohibitively expensivethen people cant afford itoh well get what you fucking deserve commie trash
>>545862629Subsidizing niggers is an ultimate BAD. The EU and the Vatican / Vatican jesuits are mass moving niggers to the USA, trying to niggerize USA in the next generation or 2.
>>545862629Boomers didn’t have credit scores when they bought their homes. Credit scores are kike inventions, and I have a 760 credit score - fuck em
>>545862629every black costs one million dollars in average lifetime contribution.I wonder if anything would change if people knew that.if they knew that every black costs one million dollars in average lifetime contribution
Like banning a credit search completely or just the use of credit scores? Credit scores are made up of all sorts of data, wouldn't they just use that (or as much of it as they're allowed)?
>>545862629Add "people with terrible credit" to the list.
>>545863364Yes, it just depends whether they can close all the loopholes for giving niggers credithttps://x.com/herandrews/status/2119426349764849933
>>545863467They'll probably just fine then if they can prove it's part of the decision making, which just means it'll effectively move underground and they'll come up with other bullshit reasons to decline
>>545862629>muh good credit muh creditwhite people are fucking pathetic
>>545862629Credit scores shouldn’t even be a thing
The problem is the state taxing you, once you get taxed it can go to whatever nigger bullshit they choose.Getting mad at the state giving shit to niggers is retarded, your money should only be used by you, or if you CHOOSE by someone else. Once you accept taxation you accept nigger subsidies
>>545862629The truly hilarious part is that by banning credit scores and geographic features in actuarial models, you are implicitly admitting that they are predictive. If they weren’t predictive there would be no need to ban them.
>>545863881Not necessarily. Corporations believe and use retarded false things all the time
>>545862629Nothing says golem like defending the jewish tradition of credit. Mine is literally N/A because I refuse to engage in that bullshit. Credit is for jew loving slaves.
>>545863640Everything about your existence is subsidised by White people, and White people are starting to wake up to that fact. That makes you nervous because you are acutely aware of how fragile that relationship actualy is.
>>545863640>ORAL
>>545862629This is an easy one. Insurance companies will pull out of the market and the remaining will price accordingly.
>>545862629no
>>545864010>Nothing says golem like defending the jewish tradition of credit.no its far more golem to ban it only so you can rob white people to pay niggers
>>545866977What is that bottom symbol?
