hire a woman to say in court that man did xman says x did not happencourt says "well, I guess that's 10 years in prison then LOL"who would you put in prison because you don't like them?
>>545950727this wouldnt work because you think the rules from a staged psyop apply to real courts.
>>545950771Right...
Imagine defending a rapist
>>545950727cope
>>545950727he looks like juden peterstein with a man bun
>>545950727>of yeah it was just one womanIt was many and russel was caught in many lies and contradictions
>>545950727I would say you but no jury would believe a woman would even talk to you.
>>545950727Did you ever consider actually looking into how criminal trials work, rather than just assuming its the stupidest way possible?
Men really cannot admit men are rapey
>>545950929proof? or did she say so?
>>545951145I talk to my girlfriends every day. They're the ones that gave me the idea.
>>545950727Are you claiming he was condemned without proofs?
I did a lot of crazy shit but keep a low profile ;3
>>545952853What proof was there?
>>545950929He was tried for three rapes and found guilty of one, four assaults and found guilty of three.
>>545953699A womans word and that's more than enough pal
>>545950727Jeets and muslims who rape children get less time than he did
>>545954228holy shit, imagine if the roles were reversed!
>who would you put in prison because you don't like them?Russell Brand
>>545954277>Imports more jeets and muslimsEnjoy your burned temple and shrines faggot
>>545950841Seems like reasonable evidence to put a man in prison for 30 years.
>>545950727Brand started out from a weak position because he admitted that sex took place. Once you do that, it's a matter of interpretation, which will almost never favor the man. He should have denied that any such incident took place at all. At that point, the prosecution has to prove that an incident occurred in the first place, which is difficult with older events.
>>545950841>>545950841so does she thing she was raped or not??Typical woman shit. This bitch is giving the lawyer what a typical cunt gives her husband.>so you're mad i didn't do the dishes?>not the word i would use>so you're not mad about me not doing the dishes?>noFucking cunts, i've seen (male) chimps more fit for civilization than these parrots
>>545950727If the dick’s a clit you must acquit!No chance Russel’s micropenis made it past that woman’s butt cheeks, and she’s claiming he tore her apart enough to bleed?She pooped the bed, got embarrassed, cried to her friends about a bad encounter, and slowly morphed her embarrassing shit story into rape through 20 years of retarded woman brain.
>>545950727The problem is that he actually confirmed that he had sex with the women. He dun goofed big time there because it went from her having to prove she ever interacted with him sexually, to him having to prove that it was consensual. His word against hers. And considering we all know what kind of guy he was/is, he stood no chance.
>>545954449This. None of these retards can process that, that retard self-condemned.
>>545954228He became christian, he should have converted to islam and they would have let him off I guess?
It’s a comically unjust circumstance, but russel brand was a retard tier leftist for the entire duration of his meaningful popularity. He only turned conservative after he spent 15-20 years promoting leftism internationally. He gleefully fed the machine that has now destroyed him, and his shift to the right over the last few years has meant nothing. Sad!
>>545950727There was more evidence than just her word but keep lying to yourself if it makes you feel better.
>>545956046like what?
>>545950727>be sex haver>have tons of hot casual sex with beautiful young women>the woman who licked your arsehole 3 minutes after meeting you takes a few shekels to say you raped her>go to jailGOOD.If I can't get hot young women to casually lick my arsehole then Russel shouldn't be allowed to do it either.
>>545950727And there are still people who try to get out of jury duty
