[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1790250768672861.mp4 (1.4 MB, 720x720)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB MP4
Serve. Protect. Spam the doorbell.
>>
>>545999767
What in the onions green...
>>
>>545999767
Post context nigger.
>>
>>545999767
he is at an apartment complex so you know the resident is black
>>
File: file.png (998 KB, 1053x1065)
998 KB PNG
>>545999767
>>
>>545999928
Maybe you should put a comma between context and nig. otherwise you're asking for nig content
>>
File: gem alarm.gif (3.63 MB, 400x396)
3.63 MB GIF
>>546000012
>>
>>545999767
Chitwood's top men
>>
>>545999993
You live with you mom

>>545999767
That's what IEDs are for
>>
>>545999928
Cops want some ladies ring doorbell footage so they harass the shit out of her at 3am and end up with multiple civil rights violations and a big fat lawsuit.
Some girlboss cop eventually shows up swinging her dick around completely oblivious to how many laws shes breaking and gets slapped with a lawsuit and fired.
Protip: they don't have an obligation to public safety and you don't have an obligation to aid their investigation.
>>
>>545999928
it looks like the officers want to talk with whoever is in the house
>>
>>546000730
Whys the front dude look like he only drinks IPAs and met his girlfriend (who weighs more than him) at a stomp clap show?
>>
>>546000717
based if true
>>
>>546000717
where was this
>>
>>546000839
Its absolutely true. Cops just enforce policy and no one can be forced to help them do their job.
>>
>>546000858
Right outside some lady's door
>>
>>546000858
>>546000839
On second examination this might be a different case. The one im thinking of has a time stamp of August 18 2026.
>>
>>546000818
its the beanie
>>
>>546000730
whered you come up with that conclusion
>>
>>546001095
usually when people want to meet with others at someone else's house they'd press the doorbell. in this case he presses the doorbell around 30 times, so he REALLY wants to talk with whoever is in the house.
>>
>>546001030
The collar and glasses too but honestly look at those week 50y boi shoulders. Absolutely disgraceful.
>>
>>546001224
Weak***
>>
>>545999767
What a faggot.
>>
>>545999767
New chuddie
>>
>>546000989 (you)
>>
>>546001499
Checkt
>>
>>546000717
Cops dont get fired just for annoying uncooperative women with their police requests at sleeping time. And it's nearly impossible to sue them successfully thanks to qualitative immunity
>>
get a warrant, chud
>>
>>545999767
New Chud just dropped
>>
>>546001599
Ok boomer
Your punisher stickers on your ram 6900 hiv+ edition are cringe as fuck. You also lost tranny.
>>
>>546001599
You're right, unfortunately. The case I was talking was Officer Umphlet in Greenville N.C. and she wasn't fired. Lol. Administrative leave. Shes a hardcore dyke. Crazy that any police department would want her on the force but then again no one but these types wants to be cops anymore.
>>
>>546001183
And after a certain point, it becomes harassment. Then after being told to leave it becomes trespassing.
You can absolutely call the cops on the cops, better to call the sheriffs though.
>>
>>546001599
Police lose qualified immunity when they violate rights.
Cant sue a cop for running over your foot during a pursuit or pushing you down because you're in their way.
You can absolutely sue a cop if you're arrested without cause, searched illegally, or otherwise breaking no law and are still harassed by police.
>>
>>546003212
that's actually completely false. Unless it's banned by the state / local govt, qualitative immunity is always at play if the officer is being sued for monetary damages over something they did while on duty
>>
>>546003566
No, its absolutely true. Federally. Qualified immunity only covers actions that do not directly violate constitutional rights.
>>
>>546005099
give a source because my searches say thats wrong
>>
>>545999767
Gem Alert
>>
>>545999767
No warrant no answer.
Deploy explosive doorbell cam
>>
Never open the door, ever, to anybody. Make sure to tell your friends to announce themselves before dropping by, by text message, whatsapp whatever, always.
>>
who the fuck answers their door in islamerica in 2026? moreover, if you're such a boomer that you open the door for ANYONE who you don't know, you're not doing it at 3:24am. i haven't opened my door for a stranger at any point in the last 10 years. i will literally turn my coach light off if i suspect you're selling something.
>>
>>546005951
That I am sure is tremendous advice where you live
>>
>>546005552
And yet YOU didn't feel the need to give me a resource that says that's wrong... Curious.
Is your resource brown in color and shaped like a little circle with ridges?
>>
File: 1000008268.jpg (81 KB, 720x562)
81 KB JPG
>>546005552
Anyway...You obviously didn't look, or you're a retard. Just search for
>How does a cop lose qualified immunity
You'll find the running theme in all the sources you'll be provided using that term boil down to, or flat out say
>When a cop violates someone's rights.
I hope you're not fat and ugly on top of being retarded, because if ya are....May as well ckeckout early.
>>
>>546007748
>>546007998
this thread deserves bumps
>>
File: 1000008258.jpg (756 KB, 1152x1712)
756 KB JPG
>>546008069
Be my guest. I'm not here to kill threads, I just don't want to be the cause of bullshit getting attention. Yet I love to shitpost and occasionally have intriguing conversations.
I don't pay taxes either... except sales, I won't become a thieving nigger to avoid not paying sales tax. Although I generally do get a ten percent discount most places, so it works out anyway.
>>
>>546000049
found the contextnigger
>>
>>546001599
The case he is talking about they requested the doorbell footage and the female homeowner declined to help- saying the camera doesnt work. So they entered her house with no warrant, arrested her and made her use her fingerprint to open her phone so that they could access the camera app on there.. all with no consent or warrant.
>>
>>545999767
So-called "government" employees have no duty to serve nor protect anyone. Ever. Under any circumstances.
>>
>>545999767
shoot these pigs through the fuckin door
>>
>>545999993
lmao faggot white people don't own houses

you live with your mom
>>
>>546010779
Lol, holy fuck she is gonna get PAID!
I audited my town last summer...On the one hand all the cops were cool and very respectful to me...on the other hand none of them gave me any reason to sue...
Less than 3% negroid population in my area is likely why.
I walked around with my AR slung taking photos and video of govt buildings while I was on public property. Got a few waves and only one cop actually approached me. All he did was tell me to be careful, he knew I was auditing without me telling him.
He didn't tell me in any sort of threatening way, just more as a reminder to not go larping as a Vietnam vet or something.
>>
File: 1636066457003.gif (1.85 MB, 380x201)
1.85 MB GIF
>>545999767
the only response these traitors deserve.
>b-but weez just doin our job-ACK
>>
File: pepe37.png (203 KB, 469x452)
203 KB PNG
>>546007998
>A police officer loses qualified immunity in a civil lawsuit when a court determines that the officer violated a constitutional right and that the right was "clearly established" at the time of the incident. If a plaintiff cannot prove both elements, the officer remains immune from personal financial liability.
Re-read that.
>when a court determines
not a jury, and:
>the right was "clearly established"

--So, functionally your statement:
>Police lose qualified immunity when they violate rights.
Is false. They only lose qualified immunity when ALL of three conditions are met:
1. the officer violated a constitutional right, AND
2. the right was "clearly established" at the time of the incident, AND
3. a court determines that 1 and 2 are true

However, it gets even worse:

How "Clearly Established" Law Is Proven
>Because courts give officers room to make reasonable mistakes, stripping away immunity usually requires meeting a strict legal standard:
Plaintiffs typically must point to a prior ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court or a controlling appellate court with nearly identical facts. That earlier case must have already declared the specific police behavior unconstitutional.

The "Catch-22" Effect
>Under Pearson v. Callahan, judges are allowed to skip the first question (whether the officer violated the Constitution) and immediately dismiss the case if no prior court case had identical facts. Critics argue this prevents new legal precedents from ever being set, locking future plaintiffs out of jury trials as well.

This a Court functionally need not even rule upon #1 if #2 involves any variation in facts from the 'prior court cases'. This variation in facts can be (and have been) as trivial as whether the officer first let a dog chew your leg into ground beef, how severely he broke your occipital bone with his baton, whether he tased you dry or from a distance, how many times he tased you, whether he "thought" you had drugs, or even the time of day.
>>
>>546013867
You must be fat and ugly too, leaving only your ego to rely on...Sad.
>>
>>546015233
>zero rebuttal
>zero concession
utterly worthless. don't troll outside of /b/
>>
>>546015233
why don't you bump threads
>>
>>545999767
>answer the door, chud, we need to talk about your online posts
>>
>>546010779
She can sue the police department itself, or sue the city. But the cop is protected by qualitative immunity and cant be sued for monetary compensation without passing through like 10 appellate courts (taking 10 years). You will have to post a source to convince me there was some exception to this rule for muh rights
>>
File: file.png (174 KB, 747x767)
174 KB PNG
>>546010779
>>546016545
actually I can just look it up myself by describing what you've told me.
He was not punished by the woman, only his police dept with the standard administrative leave stuff
>>
File: 1792368615363322.png (360 KB, 1024x576)
360 KB PNG
>>545999767
>Sar! Democrat won, turn in your guns and knifes
Why can't we enjoy shit?
>>
File: 1794337507415595.png (569 KB, 636x707)
569 KB PNG
>>546010994
>>
>>545999767
>doesnt end with him getting blasted through the door
C'mon I thought americans had balls?
>>
>>546015317
Your fat ugly lips keep flapping. But if you're mental gymnastics keep you from realizing what a complete fat retarded ugly loser you are so you don't KYS, I guess keep it up.. Although, I think the entire world would prefer you didn't.
>>
>>546018208
herbs. jews genocided palestinians.
>>
File: 1000008248.png (793 KB, 720x1612)
793 KB PNG
>>546015606
Same reason I don't pay taxes.
I'm in no danger from the IRS. I could file taxes and they would owe me money every year, but I don't want it, nor do I need it.
Besides, if my posts alone keep a thread from dying, it likely wasn't a very good thread. But hey, yours is doing alright, innit?
Keep up the good work buddy! <-----not sarcasm <----- neither was that<------ or that<-------this one ie a little.
>>
>>546018271
Okay?
>>
>>546018391
meds status?
>>
>>546018589
You should probably stretch before you reach so much kiddo. When was the last time you saw your toes?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.