Like the poor cunt that was sent to prison for two years for a facebook post.Bongs are even more cucked than canadians.
>>546036860uk is more systematically cucked than canada but canada has way worse migration and demographics. uk population is also more aware of what's happening while canada is asleep and only pays attention to america. which one is more cucked is too close to call.
>>546037004We're 10 years behind the US in terms of cuckhood, Canada is only 5.
>>546036860
>>546036860Based on reporting I too thought there was no evidence, but there was a lot of it, and Russel himself acknowledged that everything in fact happened, just that it was all consensual. But his apologies and such made that rather clear it wasn't.In any case, I'd hang this fag kike judge and brand with the same wet knot.
>>546036860I sentence that gay wigged nonce to life in prison for raping, killing and eating children.
>>546037250> Asuming what a woman says is true no matter what> They get paid if they lie> Justice
>>546037585If I end up in litigation with a hole give me a black male judge/jury everytime.
>>546036860He's Jewish. In Britain if they decide to take you down you are fucked. The Times and Channel 4 were paying girls 10 to 15k each to push ahead with a prosecution of stuff that's 20 years old. Brand was a sex pest but if you know you have that history don't stay in the UK or a country where they can extradite you
>fornicators getting what they deserve
>>546036860Are Brits compiling a list of traitors a la Madame Defarge?
>>546036860Corroborated witness testimony is evidence. You anti vaxxers only expose how stupid you are with these posts. Maybe you should apply to visit your YouTube cult leader in prison.
>>546038688Have you gotten your boosters? There are new COVID strains this winter
>>546036860We're cucks for sending rich and famous people to jail? do they not jail celebrities in italy? it is a very corrupt country from what I've seen
>>546038688>Corroborated witness testimony is evidence3 women agree to lie and back up each others lies, this is now "evidence".
>>546037250What did Russ' rump taste like? My bet? Over ripe plums and aubergine with a slight zesty twang because he goes fortnights between baths.
>>546036860Bro, it’s not even just the judges.It’s any jury in the UK from a random population sample size is completely cucked.White jurors are more likely to convict white suspects than brown suspects for the same crime.Brown jurors are FAR more likely to convict white suspects that brown suspects for the same crime.The entire white UK population is indoctrinated to hate themselves.Regime change won’t fix that. They are seriously screwed
>>546036860Christian preacher:>"Fornicating is a sin! Don't do it"Satanic jewkike who dated a rothchild>"Aayyy haha lmaoo brooo u just mad, watch me get my ass licked and bang this groupie lelelel"20 years later>"NOOO PLS MR JUDGE!!! HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO ME!!!"
>>546038688Its funny all the MIGA americans on twatter yelling about lack of DNA and forensic evidence in this case. Apparently we never should have convicted anyone in the 700 years before we had that technology
>>546039038It's a shit country that is obsessed with calling everybody a nonce and wagging a finger with a false sense of superiority. For all the faults of America it wouldn't wash there, there would need to be video or DNA or something substantial and America is the only country in the world that makes a sincere effort at upholding free speech.
>>546038688>one witness testified how she complimented his shirt and he said, "she could have it", before he tried dragging her into some toilets. When she resisted, he realised he'd misread her signals, and immediately let her go>another witness who went home with him after only just meeting and had a night of debauchery she later regretted, received a text from him (because why wouldn't you exchange numbers with your rapist) that said "you’re dirty and I wanna push you further.”. She responded by saying, “I think you pushed me far enough, you treated me like an animal”, where Brand realised she wasn't interested in kinky talk or casual sex, replied a simply "sorry", and broke all contact.Why didn't they take the corroborated witness testimony of him respecting women's choices, and immediately leaving them alone when they're not interested?
>>546039101I hope you’re a woman and that’s why you hold this stance against men. At least it would make sense then.
>>546039392because it doesn't advance the case that anything a woman says = rape.
>>546036860Isn't Angloid low IQ justiice system based on the jury made of random plebs who "judge" based on whims and vibes whether someone is guilty or not?I would explain the Lindsay Clancy and Derek Chauvin cases as well.
>>546039392Why are you being such a misogynist? A police unit has been sent to your location.
>>546039392>burglar doesn't break into every home he cases>browses for suitable targetWhat are you trying to say here? He's a loose cannon with limited appeal and a lower success rate than more handsome leftist males?
>>546039442This is the biggest problem with it, the accusations were from 1999 to 2009. It's too long ago and is downgraded in credibility due to time passed. But the UK legal system ignores that when it's decided we want to punish you because you fucked her in the arse which is a technicality of consent and MI5 wants you gone, so sorry old chap.
>>546036860> evidencehe admitted to storing the victim for consentual vagene penetration (but unwilling anal) under the name "T for Tart" on his phonewhat more evidence do you need?> tate brothers are shitting bricks
>>546038688It's funny how pol goes on and on about women's history but then a man gets held accountable for his history and it's "it's in the past! He's ready to settle down now! He's a new person!"
>>546038688>Corroborated witness testimony is evidence.>she said she said vs he saidit is evidence because they passed legislation it was evidence but for 400 years in england it wasn't considered evidence. in that johnny depp civil trial in the US there were hundred of times when a lawyer asked "what did you hear about X?" to a "witness" and it was objected to and objection sustained for hearsay because a person not there cannot comment on what they were told about something they didn't themselves witness.but that isn't the case in england where someone telling you something on the phone after the "fact" counts as evidence that the thing happened.logically there is no way this is defensible. the corroborating witness can definitely confirm they were told about something but there is no way for them to know if the the thing claimed is true or not.
There was evidence, he sent her messages explicitly admitting to what he did. An apology which is an admission of guilt does not exculpate you lol
>>546040179I don't care he fucked her in the arse. She agreed to sex and got an outcome she didn't like. If her arsehole was injured in 2009 start a case in 2009. Why did it start up again in 2020? Because the Times and Channel 4 started offering women money then to go after him.
>>546040462I think anally raping someone is bad so let's agree to disagree.
>>546040179AFAIK that specific text message exchange in question wasn't actually presented as evidence directlyinstead, she recounted that exchange during interview, and that was what was presented as evidence, with the papers mocking-up her account of the conversation to look like a modern messaging appI'd be interested if you could prove otherwise
>>546037114Ahead you mean. You can't say with a straight face burgerstan is more cucked than bongistan. Thats just straight up lying.
>>546040595I don't think it's rape if she agreed to sex. If he fucks her in the mouth which she didn't specifically agree to but it was implied by agreeing to sex and then she gets a mouth ulcer from it, I say tough luck and sending a text message to apologise for the ulcer is just courtesy. If you disagree don't wait for Channel 4 to offer you £13,000 first.
>>546040595the event took place in 2012, no?so it's under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which for an allegation of rape requires proof not only that complainant didn't consent, but also proof that the defendant did not reasonably believe that the complainant consented at the time of the incidentso if he had reason to believe that she was into it - given he was a sex and drug-addicted narcissist, and she'd already consented to have sex with him, and performed anilingus on him, and didn't firmly establish that anal sex was out of the question - then it's not a clear case of rape under the act, even if she didn't consent in her own headher consent is only half of it, the other being what he believed her consent to beso if he did not 'reasonably believe' that she did not consent, i.e. if a 'reasonable person' would not believe that she did not consent, then it simply does not qualify as rape under the Sexual Offences Act 2003on paper, that seems like a fair and measured lawand so it looks increasingly like a deliberate misapplication of the law to politically silence him
>>546040951The US has already passed the point of no return.
>>546036860How can anyone take some kike in a wig seriously? How do not ALL legal precedures end in contempt of court in Bongoland?
>>546036860Why do the still wear those faggy 1700s wigs?
>>546039974>Chad sees the error of his ways and changes for the better. Could still be getting combo blowjob/rimjobs in bathroom stalls from women he just met, actively chooses not to>roastie slams into the wall and gets ejected from chad's slam pig harem. Decides to "turn over a new leaf" and leave behind promiscuity now that she can't get it, unless she gets an invite to chad's auxiliary slam pig harem>tradcuck cannot tell the difference
>>546037331Based except I disavow the killing of human beings
>>546044595humiliation ritual imposed by the true owner of England
