Don't people in national security have to sign some paper that they don't ascribe to extremist views or related to someone that is? Having a son who supports Marxism and terrorism is kind of a breach of that, isn't it? Should the trend of getting people fired for antis-social left-wing beliefs be encouraged in society?
>>546038568Communists are simply higher caste
>>546038568what is an extremist view?
>>546038657They are not fit to be high caste. Communists, and left-wingers in general are mostly unfit for "thinking" jobs and are best fit for manual labor.
>>546038568You don't understand how the state or state contracts work
>>546038568RIP to the BBC who will rape him in prison, he will catch aids fucking this antifa
>>546038734I would imagine the generic leftist goal of overthrowing the state to establish "dictatorship of proletariat" or whatever the fuck Stalin tried to do.
>>546038734Anything the kikes say.Oh this is another kike Twitter threadGood catch Jap
>>546038815But that's just your opinion. To communists their view is normal.
>>546038568Big defence contractors are as corrupt and kiked as they come. They don't even have decent black projects anymore. It's all been niggered and jewed to the core.
>>546038808I'm pretty sure with any national security job there is an NDA and some kind of "I promise not to be a spy" statement signed.
>>546038880But that's my point, Lockheed Martin should probably purge employees who have such beliefs or related to people that do.
>affluent leftistChampagne socialist! Grifter! Hypocrite!>non-affluent leftistSeething loser! Envious of your betters! Lazy parasite!
>>546039047Why? Because YOU personally think communism is extreme?Maybe communism is the very thing that will save America.
>>546038568Communism was created by capitalists thats pretty basic knowledge. Regulatory capture is a capitalist tool. Capital doesnt want a free market
>>546038777This is generally the problem with the modern world. People who have no business managing capital/other people/education do so to deleterious results.
>>546038568The dad could lose his security clearance because of his dumbass son.
>>546039167Affluent leftist are harmful to society, non-affluent ones less so. As you said, they are mostly just jealous dysgenic losers. State should make its primary goal to turn affluent leftists into harmless non-affluent leftists. Seize their assets and use them to fix the economic damage for left-wing policies.
>>546040199If one's being a "jealous dysgenic loser" is to be established on the basis of merely "disagreeing with me" rather than any kind of objective metric then I'll take the liberty of applying the same judgment to the people I don't like
>>546039194Because having a communist son makes him likely to do communist spy shit. This isn't me and anyone else with economic background viewing communism as retarded secular religion for jealous dysgenic rejects, its simply a conflict of interest thing that's bipartisan and apolitical.
>>546040572No, it makes him more likely to be sympathetic to "cause" of China, Iran, EU, Brazil or whichever other left-wing faction hostile to US he feels comradeship with, which makes his dad a security liability from Lockheed Martin standpoint. Again, China would be right to fire anybody who works in same position and is sympathetic to Trump/USA just form same logical perspective.
>>546039897Exactly. I'm more on a conservative but I do think we need some kind of societal hierarchy, and when we look at history people with right-wing beliefs are meant to rule the ones with left-wing beliefs, kinda like Patricians ruled over plebs in Rome.
>>546040924So the criterion for loserdom is not supporting the American right wing?
>>546042032> being left is one of criterions of loserdomYes.
>>546038966It’s a Type 3 Secrecy Agreement. Fun fact, Secrecy Agreements weren’t actually legally binding under the Espionage/National Security/Atomic Energy Act until the Reagan Era.
